Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be concerned about what Liz Kendall is up to with disability benefits?

1000 replies

Locutus2000 · 01/02/2025 13:54

The Times reporting just how enthusiastic Labour are about targeting the disabled.

I can only hope they are getting the worst ideas out there first, if not I dread to think what is coming in the upcoming review.

I was confident Labour would at worst be no worse than the Tories.

I was wrong.

Free archive link here.

Long-term sick will need to look for jobs in benefits overhaul

Claimants could face cuts of £5,000 a year as government prepares for rows with backbenchers and campaigners over bringing down £65bn sickness bill

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/long-term-sick-will-need-to-look-for-jobs-in-benefits-overhaul-kzxr3hjpw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 16:05

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 16:03

Agree with pension age increase correlation to increased benefit spending - what did they think would happen if older people are expected to work with declining quality and access to healthcare.

Older bodies can be worn out!

Exactly. By our early sixties most people are starting to end up with chronic illness/ joint issues etc which mean they can no longer continue to do their jobs so have to claim working age benefits.

Kendodd · 01/02/2025 16:05

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 15:47

It's not just the actual disability benefits ( up to potentially £175 a person per Week ) though. It's all the premiums etc that go with them too. I'll give you an example of an elderly couple I helped recently. They were both awarded higher rate Attendance Allowance. Now I know others on here will argue with me but I think AA is very easily awarded, there's no assessment etc. That gave this couple £215 a week extra. They then became eligible to claim Pension credit and with this ridiculous ongoing farce of being able to claim two severe disability premiums and two carers premiums for allegedly caring for each other, they were then also eligible for a load of Pension credit, all council tax paid, they would have got all rent paid had they paid rent. They ended up with over 1.6k extra in benefits per month. They themselves couldn't believe it. they thought they'd won the lottery. This was for ONE couple. Of course if they don't spend it they stop being eligible for the pension credit part as it's means tested so they just give it away instead. At least I guess that way some of it is going back into the economy.
My career in benefits is coming to an end soon as my project ends. and in some ways I'm relieved.
I think unless you are in the know about the amounts some actually receive. it is hard to understand why it's unsustainable.

Edited

I think sometimes this is part of the problem. I volunteer in a similar way and see people being awarded relatively high amounts in disability/sickness benefits. Great. Problem is, the people I've seen (young people) come from a poor area, their peers are working in hard, miserable minimum wage jobs and have significantly less spare money than they do. The benefits claimants are all ill with depression/anxiety etc have no incentive to get better as these minimum wage jobs are all that awaits them. I'd be depressed as well.

And it's not like when I was young, even with a minimum wage job you could buy your own home, have spare money to go out and be able to see benefits from your labour, not now, you can work all week and have absolutely nothing spare to show for it. We see the resentment all the time towards the working poor. Posters on MN slag them off and claim they aren't poor if their mums care worker dares to buy themselves a coffee from Costa once a week.

Msmoonpie · 01/02/2025 16:05

BananaNirvana · 01/02/2025 16:01

You can’t blame everything on Covid 🙄. That is not the issue for a lot of the people I work with. We need to move forward. It’s been 5 years.

I’m hardly blaming everything on it. But it’s likely to have had an impact.

JenniferBooth · 01/02/2025 16:05

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 16:03

Agree with pension age increase correlation to increased benefit spending - what did they think would happen if older people are expected to work with declining quality and access to healthcare.

Older bodies can be worn out!

From full time factory jobs that they worked in until two months before their 80th birthday (in DMs case)

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 16:06

Msmoonpie · 01/02/2025 16:04

I’m pleased for you that it didn’t have a detrimental impact on you and those around you.

But there are still people it did really impact.

How do you know it did not have a negative impact? Both myself and DP lots our jobs as a result and now earn less. It negatively impacted us. But I do not use it as an excuse to drop out of life.

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 16:06

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 15:44

The number of people on sickness and disability benefits has soared. It was never sustainable

How soon we forget Covid and its long term effects - oh wait it doesn't exist now it's not convenient for the government.

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 16:08

Kendodd · 01/02/2025 16:05

I think sometimes this is part of the problem. I volunteer in a similar way and see people being awarded relatively high amounts in disability/sickness benefits. Great. Problem is, the people I've seen (young people) come from a poor area, their peers are working in hard, miserable minimum wage jobs and have significantly less spare money than they do. The benefits claimants are all ill with depression/anxiety etc have no incentive to get better as these minimum wage jobs are all that awaits them. I'd be depressed as well.

And it's not like when I was young, even with a minimum wage job you could buy your own home, have spare money to go out and be able to see benefits from your labour, not now, you can work all week and have absolutely nothing spare to show for it. We see the resentment all the time towards the working poor. Posters on MN slag them off and claim they aren't poor if their mums care worker dares to buy themselves a coffee from Costa once a week.

Exactly. I read somewhere that GP's have a label for all these people living on sink estates with no prospects claiming long term disability benefits - they are known as SLS - shit life syndrome. So many people are victims of abuse and go on to have long term addictions and MH issues, no prospects, no real family support, living in shit housing. They stay long term on these benefits because the alternative is no better. It's a really sad state of affairs.

Msmoonpie · 01/02/2025 16:08

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 16:06

How do you know it did not have a negative impact? Both myself and DP lots our jobs as a result and now earn less. It negatively impacted us. But I do not use it as an excuse to drop out of life.

My mistake. Because you were so dismissive of its effects on others I thought you might not have experienced it.

Now I see you did and expect everyone who had negative impacts to be like you.

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 16:09

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 16:04

Yes you are over simplifying. A young person with no work history is going to earn minimum wage.
Lots of people with ADHD and mental health struggles work. ADHD is not a reason to not work.

There will be many people who can't because of this and co morbid health conditions. It's not a blanket ADHD = can't work. There will be a large proportion who are I imagine seriously impacted.

Remove the ADHD and focus on those crippled by depression and anxiety. A fit for purpose service will provide hope of improvement for many I'm sure. Not all I accept.

As it stands, I have seen too many people sent home from hospital the day after a suicide attempt. With adequate services, how many people could be helped.

It feels like smoke and mirrors again.

MereDintofPandiculation · 01/02/2025 16:10

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 15:47

It's not just the actual disability benefits ( up to potentially £175 a person per Week ) though. It's all the premiums etc that go with them too. I'll give you an example of an elderly couple I helped recently. They were both awarded higher rate Attendance Allowance. Now I know others on here will argue with me but I think AA is very easily awarded, there's no assessment etc. That gave this couple £215 a week extra. They then became eligible to claim Pension credit and with this ridiculous ongoing farce of being able to claim two severe disability premiums and two carers premiums for allegedly caring for each other, they were then also eligible for a load of Pension credit, all council tax paid, they would have got all rent paid had they paid rent. They ended up with over 1.6k extra in benefits per month. They themselves couldn't believe it. they thought they'd won the lottery. This was for ONE couple. Of course if they don't spend it they stop being eligible for the pension credit part as it's means tested so they just give it away instead. At least I guess that way some of it is going back into the economy.
My career in benefits is coming to an end soon as my project ends. and in some ways I'm relieved.
I think unless you are in the know about the amounts some actually receive. it is hard to understand why it's unsustainable.

Edited

Attendance Allowance doesn’t open the way to Pension Credit. If they were getting Pension Credit it was because their pre-AA income as a couple was less than £332 a week.

AA is not means tested, so it isn’t a “gateway benefit”.

Pension Credit however is means tested, and does act as a gateway to other benefits, since to receive it means you are on a very low income.

AA doesn’t have a face to face assessment, but to obtain it you need to demonstrate an inability to keep yourself clean, feed yourself, take medication. To get the higher amount, you need to show you cannot be left alone safely overnight. It doesn’t cover mobility, so you will be turned down if your application is based around being housebound and unable to shop for food.

Sunnnybunny72 · 01/02/2025 16:11

They need to means test attendance allowance. MIL has almost £1million in assets and receives around £400 AA on top every month.

EarlyM0rnibg · 01/02/2025 16:12

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 15:56

I believe it's mostly due to the increase in claims for ADHD, Autism etc and no-one has really explores why their has been such an increase unless just down to better and earlier diagnosis.

No it isn’t due to increase of claims for autism and adhd diagnosis as neither get you DLA or PIP and not having a diagnosis for either doesn’t stop you from getting PIP either. 4of us in my family have both autism and adhd. Only one has PIP.

Xenia · 01/02/2025 16:12

There are all sorts of different situations. We cannot afford what is currently in place. We probably need more sticks and fewer carrots.

PandoraSox · 01/02/2025 16:12

cheezncrackers · 01/02/2025 15:54

Sorry - that should say 'up by a third'. I misread the quote. It's still terrible and certainly suggests that a lot of people have realised the weaknesses in the screening process and are exploiting them. One of many reasons why this country is so skint!

Yeah, disabled people and immigrants are to blame for the UK's woes.

Rings a few bells, doesn't it?

To be concerned about what Liz Kendall is up to with disability benefits?
To be concerned about what Liz Kendall is up to with disability benefits?
Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 16:12

Sunnnybunny72 · 01/02/2025 16:11

They need to means test attendance allowance. MIL has almost £1million in assets and receives around £400 AA on top every month.

Crazy isn't it. I see this type of scenario on a regular basis

CarnivorousHipPain · 01/02/2025 16:13

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 16:09

There will be many people who can't because of this and co morbid health conditions. It's not a blanket ADHD = can't work. There will be a large proportion who are I imagine seriously impacted.

Remove the ADHD and focus on those crippled by depression and anxiety. A fit for purpose service will provide hope of improvement for many I'm sure. Not all I accept.

As it stands, I have seen too many people sent home from hospital the day after a suicide attempt. With adequate services, how many people could be helped.

It feels like smoke and mirrors again.

I agree with you. You can't make it very difficult to access the services that could ameliorate these conditions and then expect those with them to be well enough to work.

People also end up losing confidence when they spend a lot of time out of the workplace. That will happen to anyone, but we especially don't need that with young people who have never worked. It must feel so daunting when you've never had a job.

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 16:13

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 16:01

The problem with this is multifold.

Let's say you have a young man suffering significantly with ADHD ( yes the true prevalence of this very real condition is astronomical in my view now). So you have a young man with ADHD and associated mental health struggles. Let's say accessing an assessment for diagnosis then enables that man to try medication.

Let's say accessing mental health support in conjunction with ADHD medications transforms this young man's life enough to pursue some form of work.

The problem is, all of the above are virtually impossible to access. It's another form of collectively gaslighting people again and again.

So many people truly are stuck and need help that is inaccessible.

How about organisations are legislated to pay a decent wage above the current wage which means those who can work are going to fight for work. If that means I have to pay more for the tat from Amazon for example I'm ok with that.

Who can or will target those absolute grifters in the Royal Family and what they suck out of the public purse?

Am I oversimplifying this 🤦

Criminal justice system sees a large percentage of neurodivergent men. Better they are helped than ending up in prison. Cheaper for society in the long term.

OwlInTheOak · 01/02/2025 16:14

username299 · 01/02/2025 14:04

They have placed themselves in a bind by saying they won't raise taxes. From the article, it looks like they're targeting mental health. I heard they're putting the DWP into mental health wards to talk to the sick about getting jobs

I'm wondering how this works in reality.

Edited

In some ways that could be a positive step. Often if there's a severe enough illness to be in a mental health unit they will have lost or not had employment. Discharge support is very limited, and getting back into society and having some purpose, routine and socialisation through appropriate work can be hugely beneficial to mental health, but actually finding employment can be a huge step to manage alone.
However, it would have to be appropriately managed and given as support not pressure.

Sunnnybunny72 · 01/02/2025 16:14

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 15:52

@Miley1967 I have never known anyone getting higher rate AA who was not paying for carers. It means a high need.

My MIL doesn't. She puts it in the bank.

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 16:15

PandoraSox · 01/02/2025 16:12

Yeah, disabled people and immigrants are to blame for the UK's woes.

Rings a few bells, doesn't it?

I was having this exact convo today with a relative! I said wait for it, the disabled are next

Of all the expenses why do I feel like there are other sources of loss that are far more significant than these groups.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 01/02/2025 16:16

Kendodd · 01/02/2025 15:50

Have you looked at the civil service?

There's nothing in my area that I'm qualified for currently. I'm doing a degree in cyber with the Open University that will hopefully open some doors though 🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼

PandoraSox · 01/02/2025 16:18

Sunnnybunny72 · 01/02/2025 16:14

My MIL doesn't. She puts it in the bank.

That is a shame. If she can manage with out paid carers, she should be using it to treat herself.

Presumably when she does depart this earth, the beneficiaries of her estate will repay the amassed AA to DWP?

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 16:21

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 16:13

Criminal justice system sees a large percentage of neurodivergent men. Better they are helped than ending up in prison. Cheaper for society in the long term.

Absolutely spot on. But this is ignored and we still have swathes of people saying people want to make out they're ND for the fun of it. As we see on MN all the time.

As a parent of an ND child and now watching the struggles, plus all the threads on here, I see exactly how the above comes to fruition. If these people were able to be assessed ( you can't bloody get one) , get diagnosed and access help including even ADHD meds which may reduce self medication through alcohol and drugs, how many people would go down another road.

It's just gaslighting and sticking plasters on. And Daily Mail readers will froth at the mouth because they won't realise the true statistics we are highlighting as a huge factor.

TheNuthatch · 01/02/2025 16:21

@PandoraSox
Nobody on this thread is attacking genuinely ill and disabled people. There is no need to try and start a bun fight!

Flopsythebunny · 01/02/2025 16:23

Sunnnybunny72 · 01/02/2025 16:14

My MIL doesn't. She puts it in the bank.

In that case she doesn't need it. I it's supposed to pay for the extra care needs that they say they have when applying for aa

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.