Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Princess Di was killed

1000 replies

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 15:35

There OK I said it. You hoo, crazy conspiracy theorist over here…

Yes, I know they had an inquiry though anyone high up enough to kill a Royal could snowball an Inquiry or influence the outcome ? I think it’s naive to think the law is this perfect thing.

Ive always found it odd that she was labelled a “loose cannon” by the press and was campaigning against landmines. It was said that it caused a lot of noses out of joint in politics. I would have thought that weapons dealers and the industry would have taken a huge hit.

There aren’t many celebrities or organisations that could have taken on the weapons or arms industry as powerfully as Diana. It was until then an issue that nobody touched.

Since her death there’s still landmines and the issue has never really been addressed.

I wonder if she’d been alive today what she’d be doing. Not hard to imagine her visiting children impacted by war and maybe even Palestinian refugees, beaming images around the world to restore some sanity and humanity.

I dont think we realise the humanity, bravery and brilliance she had. Could have been going to glamorous events and being a Princess but instead she was carrying on even when powerful people were upset.

I wonder how powerful those people were or was it someone British. Men don’t take a liking to women with power and it amazes me more that she wasn’t killed deliberately in the context of this.

What are the chances she would die at such a young age and to not be wearing a seat belt seems bizarre to me. Just too many coincidences.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
SlipDigby · 28/01/2025 17:24

She was at best a divisive figure and arguably a walking punchline in the run up to the accident and absolutely on a downward spiral. Just go back and look at contemporary satire. I still remember Paul Merton muttering "overblown tart" every time her name was mentioned on Have I Got News For You.

I struggle to imagine any industry being particularly bothered about being criticised by her. It would be like Katie Price having a go at a company today. It was only through her death that her reputation had a complete 180.

Topseyt123 · 28/01/2025 17:24

how come she was switched off life support so swiftly - bang - pronounced dead,

She was never on life support. She died very quickly after the accident because of a catastrophic ruptured blood vessel in her chest. There was no life support machine to withdraw because there was no time to get her to and onto one in the first place.

People make this shit up!

lifeonmars100 · 28/01/2025 17:25

x2boys · 28/01/2025 15:56

She wasent really she was a very complex person who divided opnion
It was only after she died she became Saint Diana.

Edited

prior to her death the media coverage of her holiday with Dodi was invasive, critical and voyeuristic. Then came the accident and suddenly she was an angel in human form taken from us because we didn't deserve her.What happened to her and the others who died in the crash was horrific and tragic but the whole county went bonkers. It was a very strange time

CharityShopChic · 28/01/2025 17:25

SophiaSW1 · 28/01/2025 15:50

She got in a car driven by a drunk driver and wasn't wearing a seatbelt. I think it's way more likely that was the cause.

Well exactly. This is the problem with conspiracy theories, they fall apart pretty quickly and you would need thousands of people in on it, who never ever say anything to keep the secret. It's just not feasible.

What would she be doing if she were still alive - much the same as she did in her life. Lots of good charity stuff, but also being a difficult person, picking up and dropping friends, hanging out with Michelle Obama, falling out with family members and being the MIL from hell to her daughters in law, doting granny to the grandchildren. Probably onto husband No 3 or 4.

RudbekiasAreSun · 28/01/2025 17:27

I am Eastern European and it saddens me to read what she went through and has been so hated before her death

poppymango · 28/01/2025 17:28

Sorry if someone else on this thread has shared this video before me, but it absolutely has to be done.

OP, it's an insane theory that makes no logical sense whatsoever.

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 17:28

SlipDigby · 28/01/2025 17:24

She was at best a divisive figure and arguably a walking punchline in the run up to the accident and absolutely on a downward spiral. Just go back and look at contemporary satire. I still remember Paul Merton muttering "overblown tart" every time her name was mentioned on Have I Got News For You.

I struggle to imagine any industry being particularly bothered about being criticised by her. It would be like Katie Price having a go at a company today. It was only through her death that her reputation had a complete 180.

Oh come on ! Princess Diana was permanent on front covers even in Australia. She was the the world’s most photographed woman & married to the heir of the British throne.

OP posts:
OSU · 28/01/2025 17:29

Ref your point on landmines, not a reason to assassinate her: disarmament.unoda.org/anti-personnel-landmines-convention/#:~:text=The%201997%20Convention%20on%20the,Anti%2DPersonnel%20Mine%20Ban%20Treaty.

Those that do still use them are non state actors and those not signed up. The UK signed the treaty in 97 which I know looks hmm given they did it a month after she died but the work was in motion well before.

Also yes to the Mitchell and Webb clip!!

LizzieW1969 · 28/01/2025 17:29

2dogsandabudgie · 28/01/2025 17:01

Yes, and they were supposed to dine elsewhere that night but because of the paparazzi decided to dine at the Ritz. Two other cars were used as decoys and left the hotel at the front whilst Dodi and Diana were leaving via the back. When the paparazzi realised this it led to the high speed chase.

The pregnancy rumour was started by Dodi's father. I think I read in an interview with one of the Al-Fayeds staff that Mr. Al-Fayed had asked him to lie and say that Diana was pregnant. Al-Fayed also started the murder rumours.

She wasn’t pregnant. She’d been on holiday with a close friend the week before and she apparently had her period. So that’s rubbish.

She wasn’t even that attached to Dodi. She was using him to make the surgeon she was in love with jealous, I’ve read.

hihelenhi · 28/01/2025 17:31

JudgeJ · 28/01/2025 17:14

Had Philip arranged it then it wouldn't have been done abroad under foreign jurisdiction, it made no sense. The simplest explanations are usually the best, drunk driver and a rackety boyfriend.

Indeed, there is no logical reason to think she was killed deliberately. Esp at the behest of Prince Philip!

FAR better and more decisive methods would have been used if that was the case (see the Mitchell & Webb vid as above). And her death almost caused the collapse of the monarchy initially, so would be a massive own goal really. Her relationship with Dodi really wasn't as claimed. She was panicky, yes, which you can understand. But very silly mistakes were made, esp by the Al Fayed lot, regarding her safety.

To those saying "this is like MLK, RFK and JFK", it really isn't. Because we KNOW all of those were literally assassinated. That there were plans and everything. We know all of those men were genuinely politically important and changing things massively (Diana wasn't remotely in the same way. She was tabloid fodder and immensely troublesome, but they would have known following their own protocols the tabloid interest would burn out and die down in the end). There was a video in JFK's case, there were witnesses, there were discrepancies and oddnesses, there are far more questions to ask. Lee Harvey Oswald, his background with Russia, and the Jack Ruby thing. Even MLK's family don't think James Earl Ray was the real culprit. So the likelihood of cover ups or "murk" here is far more salient than bloody Diana. I felt sorry for her (and Charles in a way, though he'd treated her very badly). it was an ever escalating mess, and a horrible shock when she died, but that's what happens sometimes in life and messy situations, I'm afraid. Emotions are high, corners are cut, accidents happen, people get hurt.

Political assassinations are something else entirely

MissRoseDurward · 28/01/2025 17:32

this was the opinion of some chauvinist communist men, that the Royal Family could not bear the fact that she went with a muslim and killed her

She had been in a serious relationship with a Muslim for two years before she got together wth Dodi.

Before she died, the papers were full of rumours that Diana was pregnant.

And Diana herself denied it, as I recall.

SerendipityJane · 28/01/2025 17:32

To those saying "this is like MLK, RFK and JFK", it really isn't. Because we know both of those were literally assassinated. That there were plans and everything. We know all of those men were genuinely politically important and changing things massively

And RFKs assassin is still alive and well and living in jail somewhere.

MeAndMyCatCharlotte · 28/01/2025 17:32

RudbekiasAreSun · 28/01/2025 17:27

I am Eastern European and it saddens me to read what she went through and has been so hated before her death

She wasn't. I am reading some of these comments and I thinking very hard about that time because it really was not how I remember it. She was not suddenly liked because she died. I think for the most part, people were just reading the papers and thinking good for her for enjoying some freedom. The world was shocked when she was killed because she was so, so famous still and so well thought of. Controversial, yes - but still very famous and still receiving tons of press coverage.

AquaPeer · 28/01/2025 17:33

I don’t understand why people think the royal family have the sort of power it would take to get someone killed. Who do they think the royal family instruct to commit mass murder? Mi6? The army? As if these services murder princesses because the royal family aren’t keen on then 😭

that don’t have this sort of power in the uk

even if they did- you think Tony Blair would’ve agreed to it? Murder of an innocent woman because she was on the cover of hello too much?

MarkingBad · 28/01/2025 17:34

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 17:28

Oh come on ! Princess Diana was permanent on front covers even in Australia. She was the the world’s most photographed woman & married to the heir of the British throne.

Edited

She was but a lot of the time the stories told were not all that positive about her, many took on a sneery tone.

Just because someone is in the news a lot doesn't mean they were universally loved.

Gardendiary · 28/01/2025 17:34

TheyAreNotAngelsTheyDontCareAtAll · 28/01/2025 16:15

Are you old enough to remember her?
It was an accident, not murder

Whether the op was or not - There were immediate questions about whether it was an accident, this isn’t a recent conspiracy, people were asking the same questions at the time. It did seem like a strange set of circumstances whether by design or coincidence.

JandamiHash · 28/01/2025 17:35

Has anyone posted this yet? Think it sums up the theory really well

LetThereBeLove · 28/01/2025 17:35

Kindly OP, get a life!

LizzieW1969 · 28/01/2025 17:35

I think I would consider there to be a chance that the accident was staged if it had taken place in the UK. But she was in France, and there would have had to be collusion with the French authorities, which makes it thoroughly unbelievable.

MeAndMyCatCharlotte · 28/01/2025 17:36

MarkingBad · 28/01/2025 17:34

She was but a lot of the time the stories told were not all that positive about her, many took on a sneery tone.

Just because someone is in the news a lot doesn't mean they were universally loved.

'It would be like Katie Price having a go at a company today.' That is a million miles away from the truth.

IcedPurple · 28/01/2025 17:36

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 17:28

Oh come on ! Princess Diana was permanent on front covers even in Australia. She was the the world’s most photographed woman & married to the heir of the British throne.

Edited

She was on front covers because she was the tall, pretty, recently divorced Princess of Wales, cavorting around the Riviera with a playboy who was engaged to someone else.

That doesn't mean she was always admired or respected.

BoreOfWhabylon · 28/01/2025 17:36

LittleLegoTree · 28/01/2025 16:59

OP, you say 'I’m miserable and bored in my life right now is how.'.

I suggest that it will be more rewarding for you to take that energy and effort and do something useful with it in the real world - follow the example of your beloved Queen of (People's) Hearts and go and do some charity work, volunteer at a wildlife sanctuary, go and shop for old people or help out at a hospice or something.

Conspiracy theories like this will always have currency because people like to believe that there's some higher power in control somewhere, because it makes them feel safe. The truth is that there isn't, and we are all plainly where we are. Nobody could have made such an elaborate murder plan and executed it on an evening when the original events planned had been changed at the last minute, and then somehow all the dozens of people involved kept quiet for nearly 30 years. It just isn't feasible. Use your head and move away from YouTube.

Perfectly put

JandamiHash · 28/01/2025 17:37

Look the woman was a serial attention seeker who took a totally unnecessary journey knowing how many photographers were outside, got in a car without putting on a seatbelt, having ditched her very high end palace security who’d have advised her differently, and didn’t wear a seatbelt and the driver was drunk.

It’s really not a terribly big coincidence that it all ended in disaster

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 17:37

OSU · 28/01/2025 17:29

Ref your point on landmines, not a reason to assassinate her: disarmament.unoda.org/anti-personnel-landmines-convention/#:~:text=The%201997%20Convention%20on%20the,Anti%2DPersonnel%20Mine%20Ban%20Treaty.

Those that do still use them are non state actors and those not signed up. The UK signed the treaty in 97 which I know looks hmm given they did it a month after she died but the work was in motion well before.

Also yes to the Mitchell and Webb clip!!

I don’t think it was about a treaty. I think it was that she had a place at the table and power & was able to steer the media wherever she wanted. Her media power was able to swiftly outrank what politics usually controlled. Maybe it was about the bigger picture. All of a sudden she wasn’t a Princess but a woman with a hugely influential voice and one that prioritised humanitarian efforts, not politics….

Articoe mentioning the concern of conservatives,

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a12021518/princess-diana-landmines/

That is why I felt drawn to this human tragedy," Diana said during a speech in June of 1997 about her trip. "How can countries which manufacture and trade in these weapons square their conscience with such human devastation?"

Screen shot of article section about government concern of Di weighing in,

To think Princess Di was killed
OP posts:
Nanny0gg · 28/01/2025 17:37

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 17:22

No I just happened to be reading about the vast amount of Ogliarchs that have died in the last few years. There’s a whole list of them and gosh there are a lot of suicides if rich Russians. I guess that’s what got me thinking about this.

They were all defenestrated for very different reasons

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.