My twins were born by semi elective c section 7 years ago. Twin 2 was breech so I was booked in for a c section 2 days later but they couldn’t hear a heart beat for him after I had my 2nd steroid injection (the standard I think if a baby is being born early - I was 36+5 which I know is good for twins). They tried to send me home but I felt something wasn’t right so I called a different hospital and asked if they would see me but they insisted I went back in and tell the midwife there that I wasn’t happy to just go home (I remember them being a bit shocked that I wasn’t staying to be monitored anyway) I was sent to theatre to have the c section early as it really wasn’t going to make much difference when I was so close to term and the babies were a good size on all scans.
Twin 1 was fine. Twin 2 was not breathing and had to be resuscitated with no cause as far as I am aware) Obviously it was a horrendous time for us, not helped by the fact that he was in NICU for a week and I had to push twin 1 from the maternity ward to the NICU and not once did a doctor come to see me where I was with twin 1 and let me know how twin 2 was! I just had to ask the nurses on duty when I went around there after pushing a heavy weight and being stitched up I was never told what time they did their rounds etc so I missed them lots of times and sometimes I was questioned why I was leaving the ward with twin 2 and it was upsetting having to explain that we were going to NICU to see her brother.
Twin 1 now has a diagnosis of autism. Of course this could be a number of causes but part of me can’t help but think that him not breathing for more than a minute could have caused this. When I read his notes from the hospital (only quite recently as I find it very distressing) it states that the doctor was advised by the midwife to use a smaller oxygen mask but (in the 1st person) they didn’t think it was large enough so switched back to a larger one. To be honest it doesn’t sit right, who is in charge in this situation? Surely to write that means it was an issue and it shouldn’t have been? I can’t help
but feel like they maybe didn’t get it right.
Am I unreasonable to ask them to explain why it wasn’t clear who was in charge and for a doctor to make the best decision they could without being swayed by someone else?
Of course it’s a very sensitive subject so I understand that perhaps I am not viewing this as an outsider would so will happily accept kind responses that disagree.