Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Leaving a council tenancy to move back in with mum need some reassurance

254 replies

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 09:43

For context I am 28 and single. I was given a council tenancy on a one bedroomed flat three years ago. Since then my circumstances have changed and I now earn 38k a year and I am in a position where I could buy a 2/3 bedroomed house soon. I have a 5% deposit saved but I need 10% really otherwise I am going to get stung my interest rates. I could save this in a year moving back in with my mum. I need to bite the bullet and do it however I know I would never get given another council tenancy again and I feel a bit scared of letting it go. Am I mad to consider giving up a secure tenancy to move back in with my mum?

OP posts:
Newgreensofa · 26/01/2025 12:30

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 12:06

In an ideal world, yes.

But you have to work with the system you have. OP is incredibly lucky and has a home for life - giving that up because it's "morally right" to go back and live with her mum at 28 makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I very much doubt all the "move back home" posters would happily give up their own, secure properties to go and live in their mum's spare room either Hmm

Yes I agree with you and I think some are being unkind to the OP because her plan IS to move on from her secure tenancy into ownership - her question is when not should she.

verycloakanddaggers · 26/01/2025 12:31

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 10:17

I moved around a lot as a child around privately rented and we never had a 'family home' as such and I think this is why now I have an irrational need for stability and to 'own' a home

You have stability NOW. Don't throw it away.

The sensible thing to do would be to stay put and save up slowly.

Moving in with your mum makes you extremely vulnerable.

I agree with everyone else - do not give up your council tenancy. That would be such a foolish thing to do.

AgingWellThankYou · 26/01/2025 12:35

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 09:57

I could probably save 500 a month living here but 1000 a month at mums

So, if you think it can take you a year to save at your mum’s, you can stay in your stable situation and reach the same target in two?

In that case, stay! You are still working towards your goal in a reasonable timeframe, you maintain your independence and it is much lower risk.

Don’t gamble to speed it up by a year. Unforeseen things can happen that require money (I had to go private for emergency surgery, an unexpected large bill) and you are stuck faaar longer than expected.

Spidey66 · 26/01/2025 12:36

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 26/01/2025 12:30

I don't get all the people saying stay put for this reason and also Id prefer a shot at owning my own house. Equity is another way of saving for old age. There's a limited supply of every form of social welfare and there are always new people in need, if someone no longer needs that support it should go to someone who actually does. It's an interesting comparison to many of the threads about UC or disabled people who can't work, where it's all get a job, get off benefits, why should the state pay for you. Here we have someone being told the state should go on supporting them when they no longer need that support. I'm curious why the difference when they're all tax payer funded forms of welfare. Why is it ok to occupy a council house and take money from other tax payers when you don't actually need to. Why are people in council houses seen as deserving of life time tenancies past the point when they no longer need that support.

How is she taking money from taxpayers? Council or HA properties are NFP. They are charging an affordable rent that simply pays the cost of the property. The OP is paying that rent herself. The rents are not subsidised by the tax payers. She's not planning to stay there for ever, merely until she has saved the deposit to buy. I did exactly the same when I was her age!

ThatGladTiger · 26/01/2025 12:36

Really surprised by some of these comments.

House prices only seem to go one way, if you can save more by being at your mums you will get a place sooner. Imagine seeing the houses you want go further and further out your reach as you are only saving half the amount!

As someone who owns their own house, it’s a no brainer. I moved back in with my parents to save as did many of my friends.

How much extra do you need? How long will it take to save it. Go for it, it will be easier at your mums when you remember why you are doing it.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 26/01/2025 12:40

Leave the council flat you don’t need it let it go to someone who’s desperate for a home. Start looking right now for a property by Christmas you could be in your own home.

ScaredOfDinosaurs · 26/01/2025 12:45

Can't you buy your current place with right to buy and then flip it for profit?

MonkeyToHeaven · 26/01/2025 12:47

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 26/01/2025 12:30

I don't get all the people saying stay put for this reason and also Id prefer a shot at owning my own house. Equity is another way of saving for old age. There's a limited supply of every form of social welfare and there are always new people in need, if someone no longer needs that support it should go to someone who actually does. It's an interesting comparison to many of the threads about UC or disabled people who can't work, where it's all get a job, get off benefits, why should the state pay for you. Here we have someone being told the state should go on supporting them when they no longer need that support. I'm curious why the difference when they're all tax payer funded forms of welfare. Why is it ok to occupy a council house and take money from other tax payers when you don't actually need to. Why are people in council houses seen as deserving of life time tenancies past the point when they no longer need that support.

Because a council house isn't funded by tax payers, the rent from them pays off the loan used to build them and then the profit goes to the council.

Would you rather they rented privately and that rent money went into private hands, because that's one of the reasons councils have lost out on revenue.

In 2018 Housing someone in the private rented sector cost an average of £110 per week in housing benefit compared with £89 in social housing, an extra 23 per cent. Far fewer people would be reliant on housing benefit if they were able to access council housing in the first place, and the government’s housing benefit bill would also come right down.

Q

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 12:48

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 26/01/2025 12:30

I don't get all the people saying stay put for this reason and also Id prefer a shot at owning my own house. Equity is another way of saving for old age. There's a limited supply of every form of social welfare and there are always new people in need, if someone no longer needs that support it should go to someone who actually does. It's an interesting comparison to many of the threads about UC or disabled people who can't work, where it's all get a job, get off benefits, why should the state pay for you. Here we have someone being told the state should go on supporting them when they no longer need that support. I'm curious why the difference when they're all tax payer funded forms of welfare. Why is it ok to occupy a council house and take money from other tax payers when you don't actually need to. Why are people in council houses seen as deserving of life time tenancies past the point when they no longer need that support.

You have no idea how council housing works.

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 12:50

ThatGladTiger · 26/01/2025 12:36

Really surprised by some of these comments.

House prices only seem to go one way, if you can save more by being at your mums you will get a place sooner. Imagine seeing the houses you want go further and further out your reach as you are only saving half the amount!

As someone who owns their own house, it’s a no brainer. I moved back in with my parents to save as did many of my friends.

How much extra do you need? How long will it take to save it. Go for it, it will be easier at your mums when you remember why you are doing it.

But did you give up a secure, lifetime tenancy to move back with your parents?

Unicorntearsofgin · 26/01/2025 12:53

It depends. Would you enjoy living with your mum for a year? If you think it would work and you’d be happy and able to save more it’s a great idea but if you think it would be stifling or difficult then just spend a little longer saving in your current place.

MonkeyToHeaven · 26/01/2025 12:55

ScaredOfDinosaurs · 26/01/2025 12:45

Can't you buy your current place with right to buy and then flip it for profit?

Leaving the council with 75% of the proceeds and only allowed to spend 40% on building another? I can't think why we have an affordable housing crisis, must be all those immigrants.

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 12:58

There would be no point in buying on the right to buy as the discount has been dropped by so much that it wouldn't make sense and would trap me for 5 years for very little gain. I do like the area that I'm in and to be honest, I would struggle to buy a house in the area that I currently live! For context I was on the housing list for 5 years before being offered this flat.

OP posts:
saraclara · 26/01/2025 13:01

My brother gave up his HA home for similar 'it seemed a good idea at the time' reasons, also persuaded by our mum. That was a couple of decades ago and he still regrets it every day.

Don't even think of giving up your flat until you've actually exchanged contracts on a home of your own.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 26/01/2025 13:05

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 12:50

But did you give up a secure, lifetime tenancy to move back with your parents?

At least a lifetime tenancy it means you’re paying for it when you’ve retired. Buy your own property and be paid up in 20 years leave your retirement to enjoy your whole pension.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 26/01/2025 13:07

ScaredOfDinosaurs · 26/01/2025 12:45

Can't you buy your current place with right to buy and then flip it for profit?

This is why we’ve got a housing crisis. Council double paying for their properties.

TiramisuThief · 26/01/2025 13:08

Can we just make one thing clear - social housing/ council housing IS NOT PAID FOR BY TAXPAYERS!

It's not a benefit, it's not welfare, it's not coming out of anyone's pocket.

Most people in social housing work and pay tax just like everyone else.

Long term, councils make a profit from their housing. It's a net benefit to the tax payer, not a drain.

OP doesn't owe anyone a flat. If she wants to stay there, she should.

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 13:16

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 26/01/2025 13:05

At least a lifetime tenancy it means you’re paying for it when you’ve retired. Buy your own property and be paid up in 20 years leave your retirement to enjoy your whole pension.

But OP is planning on buying her own home.

But giving up a secure home in the meantime makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Would you really tell your kids "give up a home for life to come back and live with me"?

It makes absolutely zero sense long-term.

SassK · 26/01/2025 13:28

AgingWellThankYou · 26/01/2025 12:35

So, if you think it can take you a year to save at your mum’s, you can stay in your stable situation and reach the same target in two?

In that case, stay! You are still working towards your goal in a reasonable timeframe, you maintain your independence and it is much lower risk.

Don’t gamble to speed it up by a year. Unforeseen things can happen that require money (I had to go private for emergency surgery, an unexpected large bill) and you are stuck faaar longer than expected.

Edited

It's not a gamble though. Most 20 somethings, who are saving for a house, are staying with their parents - so it's just the norm! The OP's situation is the outlier, because most young people recognise that renting whilst saving for a mortgage makes no sense. Doing what you suggest will lose @prestatynprlck£6000 over that extra year!

What the OP is suggesting is entirely sensible. Living your life anticipating and fretting over every possible pitfall (in a 'what if' rather than 'what is' manner) isn't sensible.

DeepFatFried · 26/01/2025 13:32

Is your Mum in rented? Secure tenancy?

What if she gets evicted? (if private rental). Is she allowed to have an additional adult living there

Is your current savings and salary enough to buy 1 bed flat? As a plan B ?

biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 13:37

SassK · 26/01/2025 13:28

It's not a gamble though. Most 20 somethings, who are saving for a house, are staying with their parents - so it's just the norm! The OP's situation is the outlier, because most young people recognise that renting whilst saving for a mortgage makes no sense. Doing what you suggest will lose @prestatynprlck£6000 over that extra year!

What the OP is suggesting is entirely sensible. Living your life anticipating and fretting over every possible pitfall (in a 'what if' rather than 'what is' manner) isn't sensible.

But OP has a massive advantage over people who are living with their parents - she has a home for life already! Why would she give that up just because other people aren't as lucky as she is?

It's also not about "fretting over every possible pitfall" - it's about common sense. Giving up a permanent home to live back with mum just makes absolutely no sense whatsoever Confused

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 13:40

Mum is in a three bed housing association that she finally got when I was 17 😂

OP posts:
biscuitsandbooks · 26/01/2025 13:43

prestatynprlck · 26/01/2025 13:40

Mum is in a three bed housing association that she finally got when I was 17 😂

Don't give up your home, OP. You'd be bonkers to give up a secure tenancy you waited five years for just go back and live with mum.

photolimbo · 26/01/2025 13:44

Don't do it. You will lose any independence and what happens if you do meet someone? I would stay put!

BabyFever246 · 26/01/2025 13:45

People saying 'give it to those who need it'. She says save £500 a month in council house, £1000 a month at mums. So I assume rent is around £500/£600? Rent in my city privately for a room in shared house is £600 a month, a flat over £1000.

If OP stays in her council house a couple more years, saves well and buys a house for a mortgage of £500/£600 a month she is out of needing housing.

If she leaves, moves in with her mum, something goes tits up, ends up trying to privately rent. Rent is more than she can afford, it eats through her savings until she ends up back needing housing with nothing.

People need to leave the social housing with the financial stability to not end up back there.

Swipe left for the next trending thread