Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dispatches- Britain’s Benefit scandal

1000 replies

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 13:04

Anybody watched this? It’s made me so angry. Some highlights include a company that can’t recruit an apprentice on 26k because sickness benefits would amount to 24k so it wouldn’t be worth it. 500,000, 25-34 years old on long term sick, a woman who has never had a FT job and claims 35k in benefits, this lady would like to work but says will never achieve the same income if she worked.

This country is bankrupt, public services crumbling! What is going on? Why isn’t there an overhaul!

OP posts:
Anonym00se · 12/01/2025 14:26

BOREDOMBOREDOM · 12/01/2025 14:15

I think the person on 35k of benefits while unemployed is bullshit tbh. I had relatively high private rent and one child still got around 15k. (I am not unemployed or on benefits anymore before someone starts) Granted someone with another child would get a little more.

It's been capped at 2 kids since 2017 so maybe she has 10 kids born before then? Luckily for the taxpayer they will be adults soon sooo kinda irrelevant

Absolutely correct. People read this about one person claiming £35K and assume that everyone is claiming that much, and anyone on UC is rolling in cash. There will be a small proportion of claimants who are entitled to a larger amount because:

a) They live in London or a high rent area.
b) They have children in childcare while they work
c) They and/or their children have a disability.

Everyone else gets buttons. A single person where I live would get £8,800 pa including housing benefit.

WeylandYutani · 12/01/2025 14:27

catzrulz · 12/01/2025 14:24

Absolutely, I have a relative who has full PIP etc as she has anxiety and can't go to work.
She manages to go out every day and buys "stuff" her house is full of things she will never use.
She has new clothes all the time as do her kids, she smokes and buys 20 cigarettes a day.
She admits she'll never work and enjoys her life.
I see people working so hard on minimum wages who have nowhere near the lifestyle she has, and she's not alone.

PIP is not an out of work benefit. Many people claim PIP and still work. For some, getting PIP enables them to work.

And do you know how much full PIP is? And I doubt someone with anxiety is on the highest rate for the mobility element.

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/01/2025 14:27

ghostyslovesheets · 12/01/2025 14:23

‘Sickness benefit’? ESA is just over £90 a week - same as JSA - £4,706 a year - not £36k

rent and housing benefit is the big one!

but I think what you mean are disability related benefits- which are a totally different thing.

I’m assuming that the figure mentioned might actually be the benefits cap. Which most people won’t be getting anywhere near.

Gwenhwyfar · 12/01/2025 14:28

iamnotalemon · 12/01/2025 14:21

@dingledangledoos

Sorry, I wasn't thinking of asylum seekers - no they should not starve.

I meant generally people moving to the uk with a view of claiming benefits and not working.

Someone on here was posting recently asking if they would be better off moving to the uk than where they currently live because they could claim more benefits. That seems wrong.

Well if they leave their job in the other country, they wouldn't be eligible for months anyway.

bestcatlife · 12/01/2025 14:28

Not everyone has parents they can live with while they save for a house..

JohnofWessex · 12/01/2025 14:28

To paraphrase Jesus, Lord Denning and others, who then is they benefits scrounger?

Over a third of Universal Credit claimants are 'in work'

If you look at whats happened since about 1970

  1. The percentage of GDP going to wages has dropped, and
  2. The distribution of earnings has become increasingly unequal, and
  3. the increase in housing costs
  4. High Childcare Costs

What we then end up with is the benefits system as '...a system of universal pauperage' first talked about with the Speenhamland System.

I suggest that in many cases its the employer not the claimant

If we had a Government committed to increasing wages and reducing housing - and childcare costs then we might reduce the benefit bill.

NoOneKnowsWhoYouAre · 12/01/2025 14:28

Locutus2000 · 12/01/2025 14:09

Forcing people to do menial work for bare subsistence is uncomfortably close to forced labour.

It's hardly subsistence is it? £35k a year for a single parent, with a few kids is not subsistence 🙄 it's work for above minimum wage.

Locutus2000 · 12/01/2025 14:28

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/01/2025 14:27

I’m assuming that the figure mentioned might actually be the benefits cap. Which most people won’t be getting anywhere near.

The only way anyone is getting the huge sums mentioned will have disabilities involved and be exempt from the benefit cap.

The issue seems to be more about 'are those people faking?' and we've been there before.

JHound · 12/01/2025 14:29

iamnotalemon · 12/01/2025 14:25

@JHound

Who “immediately receives benefits” on arriving in “England”. Do you mean those seeking asylum who are not allowed to work?*

No I didn't mean asylum seekers. I just clarified that in my other post.*

Incidentally you are not fully accurate on living overseas and receiving benefits. When we were still in the EU I studied in French and received support from the French government for housings costs the same as any other French student would.
*
I have lived in two countries (not in Europe) and there is no support for non nationals. I was just talking about my experience. England is far too soft.*

I also had access to the Australian Medicare system under the reciprocal benefits scheme so once again another country I went to an “received benefits immediately.”

WeylandYutani · 12/01/2025 14:29

HaddyAbrams · 12/01/2025 14:24

Just going to point out that the only way an unemployed person is getting £35k in benefits is if they, or someone on their household, is disabled, either claiming PIP or LCWRA.
Everyone else is subject to the benefit cap, roughly £25k in London. Less in other areas.

Only if they have housing costs too.. You can be on PIP and ESA/LCWRA only (no housing element) and it wont be anywhere near £35k.

Edit - someone living alone, that is.

iamnotalemon · 12/01/2025 14:29

@dingledangledoos

Thanks for clarifying.

dizzydizzydizzy · 12/01/2025 14:29

I just don't get it. I have a chronic and disabling health condition which prevents me from working full time or doing anything stressful. I applied for PIP (a benefit for the long term sick and disabled and didn't get it).

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 12/01/2025 14:30

JohnofWessex · 12/01/2025 14:28

To paraphrase Jesus, Lord Denning and others, who then is they benefits scrounger?

Over a third of Universal Credit claimants are 'in work'

If you look at whats happened since about 1970

  1. The percentage of GDP going to wages has dropped, and
  2. The distribution of earnings has become increasingly unequal, and
  3. the increase in housing costs
  4. High Childcare Costs

What we then end up with is the benefits system as '...a system of universal pauperage' first talked about with the Speenhamland System.

I suggest that in many cases its the employer not the claimant

If we had a Government committed to increasing wages and reducing housing - and childcare costs then we might reduce the benefit bill.

Plus mass immigration since 1970. That has pushed up rents and pushed down wages.

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 14:30

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 14:14

This woman freely admitted she probably could work, but she had a 7 year old son and all her benefits would stop if she started working and the money earned would not equate to what she gets now.

Has she actually checked that I wonder?

Universal Credit has been a gamechanger in that respect.

Gwenhwyfar · 12/01/2025 14:30

NoOneKnowsWhoYouAre · 12/01/2025 14:28

It's hardly subsistence is it? £35k a year for a single parent, with a few kids is not subsistence 🙄 it's work for above minimum wage.

No, the workfare programme was for unemployment benefit. Whether you got housing benefit or any other benefit was a separate matter. As others have pointed out, not many people get £35k on benefits.

Wonderfulstuff · 12/01/2025 14:31

Wages in this country are too low and taxes, especially at the higher end, are too punitive i.e. for those that earn just over £100k. It hardly creates an environment that encourages productivity at any level.

Sadly there will always be those that seek to exploit the benefit system, which is absolutely needed in any decent society, and they will know have to navigate every twist and turn for maximum whilst others have no idea how to even start.

iamnotalemon · 12/01/2025 14:31

@JHound Medicare is slightly different though surely? That's healthcare.

If you were in Australia and couldn't work, you wouldn't be earning unemployment or sickness benefits?

JHound · 12/01/2025 14:31

iamnotalemon · 12/01/2025 14:25

@JHound

Who “immediately receives benefits” on arriving in “England”. Do you mean those seeking asylum who are not allowed to work?*

No I didn't mean asylum seekers. I just clarified that in my other post.*

Incidentally you are not fully accurate on living overseas and receiving benefits. When we were still in the EU I studied in French and received support from the French government for housings costs the same as any other French student would.
*
I have lived in two countries (not in Europe) and there is no support for non nationals. I was just talking about my experience. England is far too soft.*

You haven’t clarified.

Who is able to claim benefits immediately on arrival in the UK?

BOREDOMBOREDOM · 12/01/2025 14:31

Anonym00se · 12/01/2025 14:26

Absolutely correct. People read this about one person claiming £35K and assume that everyone is claiming that much, and anyone on UC is rolling in cash. There will be a small proportion of claimants who are entitled to a larger amount because:

a) They live in London or a high rent area.
b) They have children in childcare while they work
c) They and/or their children have a disability.

Everyone else gets buttons. A single person where I live would get £8,800 pa including housing benefit.

Agreed 35k is insane I just don't believe it tbh. I don't buy that it's all for high rent either because mine was private and quite high still only 15k a year and that's for everything not just the rent. Plus there is a cap on how much rent they'll actually pay.

I can only assume they have loads of kids born before 2017. Even having a disabled child I don't think would make it to 35k.

You could be right about childcare but then people can't get mad about lazy bums

dollybirdydidmedirty · 12/01/2025 14:31

@dizzydizzydizzy and that's what irritates me, people that are genuinely sick should definitely get the help they need but unfortunately some can work the system which means people like yourself suffer! It's infuriating

NeverDropYourMooncup · 12/01/2025 14:32

TomorrowTodayYesterday · 12/01/2025 13:47

You have your pride, your self respect and every day you are making a contribution to society. I get that respect doesn't pay your bills but at least you can sleep well at night knowing you're a decent upstanding human being.

The advantage for me now - thirty years later, as the actual process of getting to a role above the 'well, you'll be topped up by benefits, won't you, or we can just get somebody who will be...so you aren't going to get a payrise/training/decent working conditions/employment rights' position is utterly shit - is that I can sleep at night not wondering whether I'll be able to make the rent, take the cheaper direct debit gas tariff, buy a winter coat and most of all, know that on the 26th of the month, my salary will definitely be in the bank instead of never knowing until the day whether there will be a payment or if somebody somewhere has forgotten to approve it/tick a box or will be claiming I was sent a letter I never received.

That's why I sleep at night - knowing it's going to be there and I won't be left penniless with hundreds of pounds of bills to pay on nothing.

LittleRedRidingHoody · 12/01/2025 14:33

dizzydizzydizzy · 12/01/2025 14:29

I just don't get it. I have a chronic and disabling health condition which prevents me from working full time or doing anything stressful. I applied for PIP (a benefit for the long term sick and disabled and didn't get it).

PIP is ridiculously hard to get and seems to be luck of the draw. DM is terminally ill, can barely move, and has constant costs that are relating to her being able to live in some form of hygienic comfort. She's been denied so many times I've stopped trying.

username299 · 12/01/2025 14:33

NoOneKnowsWhoYouAre · 12/01/2025 14:28

It's hardly subsistence is it? £35k a year for a single parent, with a few kids is not subsistence 🙄 it's work for above minimum wage.

There's a benefit cap unless you're in a household with disabilities. If that person is in full time work, who is caring for their child full time?

Frowningprovidence · 12/01/2025 14:33

dollybirdydidmedirty · 12/01/2025 14:25

Also, and I say this with genuine curiosity... why are some family's able to claim money for child that have SEN but they attend mainstream school and hang out with friends etc after school? What is the need for families to have this money? I get it if they require extra electricity as they are hooked up to a respirator 24/7 but genuinely I don't understand the need for mothers to receive this money when their child is able bodied and doesn't attend any specific appointments? I mean I don't begrudge it if it's needed but I don't understand it? I see this quite a lot at my DS school and I am baffled.

Because they meet the criteria for DLA and those criteria don't include type of school attended or ability to have friendships.

It looks at things like mobility, specific daily living tasks like washing, eating, dressing, toileting, night care.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.