Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dispatches- Britain’s Benefit scandal

1000 replies

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 13:04

Anybody watched this? It’s made me so angry. Some highlights include a company that can’t recruit an apprentice on 26k because sickness benefits would amount to 24k so it wouldn’t be worth it. 500,000, 25-34 years old on long term sick, a woman who has never had a FT job and claims 35k in benefits, this lady would like to work but says will never achieve the same income if she worked.

This country is bankrupt, public services crumbling! What is going on? Why isn’t there an overhaul!

OP posts:
HelloWorldItsNiceToMeetYou · 12/01/2025 17:06

Katypp · 12/01/2025 16:48

I don't think I have seen anyone saying that seriously ill peopll should not get benefits. It's disingenuous to suggest this.

However many people are saying that those who are genuine are a minority as though this is an indisputable fact, which is ingenuous.
There will categorically be a few who take this piss.
We are all closer to someone on benefits than the billionaire wankers peddling this nonsense in an attempt to divide the ordinary folk.

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 17:06

Julen7 · 12/01/2025 17:04

Presumably not everyone on LCWRA has something incurable that will never improve?

No but if they've lost a leg it's not growing back.

TheMoment · 12/01/2025 17:06

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 17:01

OK but that wasn't how your post read.

I agree with you it wasn’t.

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 17:07

hamcakesforlunch · 12/01/2025 14:19

For many years I was an manager working in logistics in one of the most deprived towns in the Uk. We paid a fair bit over the minimum wage and had enhancements for certain shifts. We also offered paid training to allow people to do the job. It was however almost impossible to recruit people. Those we did recruit were often from out of town. We even worked with the job centre and set up interview days, yet people that attended went out of their way to ensure they weren't picked or would tell you quite openly that what we were offering wasn't appealing as they would lose their benefits and didn't want to have to work shifts or work weekends. Attendance was also a problem as those with children and partner at home could afford to take days off here and there (ssp from day 4) and still be no worse off due to universal credit. Post furlough we also lost staff to jobs paying less as universal credit would top them up to where they were working in a higher paid role. Those on child related benefits would refuse to do overtime as they didn't need to work any more. The poor, generally middle aged members of staff with no dependents, were on the other hand usually desperate for all hours they could get. One single mother (by choice - conceived via ivf) who I employed was clear that she wasn't going to work more than the 16 hours stipulated as she didn't need to and she wasn't going to have anyone else raising her child. It's no wonder that people get frustrated, I know I certainly did, slogging my guts out day after day and going back to work when my kids were 6 months as we didn't earn enough for me to stay home any longer.

This is exactly it.

OP posts:
Jabtastic · 12/01/2025 17:07

TheMoment · 12/01/2025 16:53

people with such conditions did and still do get lifetime awards to my knowledge (and rightly so). I am shocked if there are claimants where this is not the case.

No my award was 4 years. I have to go through the whole thing again in 2 years. It was so degrading all of it. A complete stranger asking me about my bladder and bowels in spite of a raft of medical evidence. Ironically I was almost penalised because of my stoicism because I wouldn't describe myself as depressed. Thankfully the assessor nudged me at points to stop me shooting myself in the foot. I also went straight onto the highest level of everything first time but why on earth do I need to repeat it?

Essentially the process is designed to disempower disabled people because anything we do to help ourselves becomes a reason to lose PIP. So if I use PIP to fund specialist neurophysio to improve my mobility I no longer qualify. If I no longer qualify I can't afford the physio so I deteriorate. So, I have to start the process again.

Livelovebehappy · 12/01/2025 17:07

SevenMoon · 12/01/2025 17:00

Exactly. Benefits don't give people enough money to run as car, severely limiting their job opportunities, and you STILL think they're given too much! Public transport is pretty limited outside of cities too so it is very short sighted.

Many people who work cannot afford a car. To run a car, you’ve to take account of lease cost - for a basic car this can be £200 per month, insurance can be at least £300 a year, and petrol/Mot/tax could add another £200 a month, and these figures are at the lower end. For someone on minimum wage, this would be a large chunk of their take home pay. But you think benefits should be increased to accommodate these costs? Really? Buses and trains run pretty much out of most towns and cities, so can’t be used as an excuse not to use them. Only if you live rurally might it be an issue.

StScholastica · 12/01/2025 17:07

I read that 50% of nurses who graduated in the UK last year failed to find employment (largely due to the amount of international nurses taken on). This is terribly sad as these youngsters have worked so hard to gain their qualifications and have had to pay for the privilege.

Re finding a job in retail, I know that it's not that easy at all. A 19 year old neighbour had 3 interviews for a position at Asda, including one that was a group interview with 18 other applicants (for one post).

Doodleflips · 12/01/2025 17:08

YABU.
I am on benefits and I’m stuck.
i want to go to uni and get qualified and get off benefits, but I can’t afford to and UC doesn’t support it.
if I want more I’m worse off, and so are my kids.
It’s a shit life, of stress and fear, the UC system is based on shame, and it’s difficult to get out of it.

Boomer55 · 12/01/2025 17:08

TheMoment · 12/01/2025 16:53

people with such conditions did and still do get lifetime awards to my knowledge (and rightly so). I am shocked if there are claimants where this is not the case.

Yes, I do, But only after a wealth of info, consultants reports and scans - simply because I’m on the old DLA.😉

SnarkSideOfLife · 12/01/2025 17:08

ChristmasGrinch24 · 12/01/2025 13:34

£35k will mostly be for their rent. Private landlords taking the piss chucking up the rents.

A friend of mine is a landlord with multiple properties. She rents one of her most expensive ones for £1500 a month to a non working couple who are both on sickness benefits. They have a teen dd who goes to a mainstream secondary school full time but has some additional needs. So there are some benefits for the dd.

The mother gets carers allowance for looking after the dad and the dad gets carers allowance for looking after the mother 🤷‍♀️. Surely if you are so ill you need a carer you can’t also be a carer. It’s stuff like this which is taking the piss.

Also my friend has smaller three bed houses she rents out for £700 a month. But this couple are obviously comfortable enough to not have to take a smaller house. They don’t even need a three bed house, never mind a massive Victorian semi!

I just think it’s a shame that there’s people like this and then there are other people on benefits who are really struggling to get by and using food banks. It’s like some people don’t get enough and some people get too much? It needs to be fairer in order to avoid the people really at the bottom struggling so much.

Christmasandallthetrimmings · 12/01/2025 17:08

I also wanted to add that it's not a race to the bottom. Before I had my daughter I still struggled to find somewhere to live affordably on minimum wage, and it was impossible to complete my degree as student maintenance etc wasn't enough to live in and I couldn't juggle all the extra shifts I had to do to pay my rent and study and attend lectures. I ended up sofa surfing as it just became painful and wanted to save every penny. I don't think anyone is better off than anyone, unless you truly have a very well paid job.

GivingitToGod · 12/01/2025 17:09

Tapofthemorning · 12/01/2025 16:55

Well like you said yourself, not all disabilities are visible. Sorry I don't look sick enough for you.

You are missing the point.I know people with a physical diagnosis claiming PIP and other persons with same diagnosis not claiming.
Unfortunately, those who are perceived to be abusing the system spoil it for those who are in genuine need. And in some situations (not all), ability to work/number of hours to be worked is attributable to the individual

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 12/01/2025 17:10

ChristmasGrinch24 · 12/01/2025 13:34

£35k will mostly be for their rent. Private landlords taking the piss chucking up the rents.

Yeh, get a buy to let mortgage and give it a go then.

Christmasandallthetrimmings · 12/01/2025 17:10

SnarkSideOfLife · 12/01/2025 17:08

A friend of mine is a landlord with multiple properties. She rents one of her most expensive ones for £1500 a month to a non working couple who are both on sickness benefits. They have a teen dd who goes to a mainstream secondary school full time but has some additional needs. So there are some benefits for the dd.

The mother gets carers allowance for looking after the dad and the dad gets carers allowance for looking after the mother 🤷‍♀️. Surely if you are so ill you need a carer you can’t also be a carer. It’s stuff like this which is taking the piss.

Also my friend has smaller three bed houses she rents out for £700 a month. But this couple are obviously comfortable enough to not have to take a smaller house. They don’t even need a three bed house, never mind a massive Victorian semi!

I just think it’s a shame that there’s people like this and then there are other people on benefits who are really struggling to get by and using food banks. It’s like some people don’t get enough and some people get too much? It needs to be fairer in order to avoid the people really at the bottom struggling so much.

They will be paying bedroom tax for the extra bedroom, so they would still only get the rent allowance for a two bed paid by benefits.

StScholastica · 12/01/2025 17:10

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 16:56

It really isn’t that easy. I know someone who’s diligently been applying for jobs and been turned down for at least 50 because they’re “overqualified”. Obviously you don’t need a degree to stack shelves but apparently it’s actually detrimental to have one.

I've absolutely seen recruiters cast aside people for being over qualified, they give the reason as "well they won't stay, they'll be looking for something better ASAP".

Bodeganights · 12/01/2025 17:11

JHound · 12/01/2025 13:50

a woman who has never had a FT job and claims 35k in benefits, this lady would like to work but says will never achieve the same income if she worked.

I bang this drum but this is about moral character more than anything else. My single parent mother never claimed out of work benefits although it would have been better for her with young kid but she believes strongly in working for a living. Whereas my best friend’s mom (school age friend) has six kids and never worked a day in her life, feeling entitled to have the taxpayer pay for her life.

I remember doing multiple shitty low paid jobs while applying for graduate positions to have money coming in but other people I knew instead claimed unemployment while searching for a job they felt worthy off.

Some people will develop skills to get jobs they will pay the kind of salary they want. Others will sit on their arse and expect others to pay for them.

Work needs to pay more and equally the benefits system needs to be restructured to deter laziness and entitlement.

Benefits is low, mostly, one way of getting people off benefits is to make work pay.
If a cleaner (often thought of as the lowest job anyone can do) was paid more than basic benefits, enough to run a single home and a reasonable holiday every year, there would be zero incentive to be on benefits. But as it stands cleaners get min wage and often poxy hours to boot. So you can be a cleaner, still have to claim some benefits, and also jump through benefits hoops on top of shitty hours and a back breaking job or stay at home and get the same money. If I was a cleaner and didnt have back to back jobs lined up, I too would look at benefits.

TheMoment · 12/01/2025 17:11

Boomer55 · 12/01/2025 17:08

Yes, I do, But only after a wealth of info, consultants reports and scans - simply because I’m on the old DLA.😉

Yes that must be it as I know people who rightly have got lifetime awards and are never reassessed- must be the legacy DLA benefit before PIP as you say, although seems ridiculous to not still have lifetime awards for some cases.

Jabtastic · 12/01/2025 17:13

TheMoment · 12/01/2025 17:11

Yes that must be it as I know people who rightly have got lifetime awards and are never reassessed- must be the legacy DLA benefit before PIP as you say, although seems ridiculous to not still have lifetime awards for some cases.

Yes not only did I have the misfortune to become disabled but I had the misfortune to do it under the PIP regime! And ironically I actually had MS pre PIP change but the absolute mess in the NHS delayed my diagnosis by over a decade.

SnarkSideOfLife · 12/01/2025 17:14

Christmasandallthetrimmings · 12/01/2025 17:10

They will be paying bedroom tax for the extra bedroom, so they would still only get the rent allowance for a two bed paid by benefits.

Fair enough, but they could also be renting a much cheaper (but still nice) three bedroom house. If I was privately renting as someone with a decent enough job I’d struggle to justify/afford paying £1500 rent when there is cheaper available. Both in perfectly nice areas.

DaphneduM · 12/01/2025 17:14

LittleRedRidingHoody · 12/01/2025 15:58

Good luck (and I mean it) 😅

DM is terminally ill, struggles to move without help, I pay out of pocket for laundry (incontinent), caring help, a mobility scooter, a wheelchair, the extra clothes etc associated because somehow she's still not eligible for PIP! 😬

There are special rules for people that are terminally ill. Get your GP to fill out the necessary forms. Google it - there's plenty of advice online. Your dear Mum should definitely be getting financial support - I remember when my very wealthy brother was terminally ill and he qualified.

Livelovebehappy · 12/01/2025 17:14

Willyoujustbequiet · 12/01/2025 17:01

That's just not true in many cases.

My friend became disabled overnight and was expected to live on the bare minimum of less than £400 per month until she had a disability assessment. This took well over a year and she ultimately lost her home.

But that’s not relevant here. It was the system which let your friend down - very slow, which unfortunately is the case for most public services. She did eventually get what she was entitled to. It wasn’t that the amount was too low initially, as obviously people have to be assessed prior to relevant funds being allocated to them.

Arran2024 · 12/01/2025 17:15

GivingitToGod · 12/01/2025 17:09

You are missing the point.I know people with a physical diagnosis claiming PIP and other persons with same diagnosis not claiming.
Unfortunately, those who are perceived to be abusing the system spoil it for those who are in genuine need. And in some situations (not all), ability to work/number of hours to be worked is attributable to the individual

It's not about the diagnosis. It's about how your life is affected in certain areas. The diagnosis is evidence to back up what you say, but you don't get PIP for having x diagnosis.

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/01/2025 17:15

Katypp · 12/01/2025 16:40

But the theoretical worker would have to pay his/her rent out of the same amount? It doesn't matter how it's cut, £35k is £35k.

Yes, but if rents fall or are capped as in some other countries the theoretical worker gets more money in their purse to spend on what they want. The benefit claimant gets less money, therefore saving on the welfare bill.
As it is, the HB element barely covers rent, and in many cases doesn’t cover the rent and lots of places are unfit for living which is driving up spending on healthcare.

We can sit and argue about it all day but the truth is that if rent goes up benefits go up, if they go down benefits go down and the person that ends up with that money is the landlord.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 12/01/2025 17:15

JHound · 12/01/2025 13:44

Sickness needs to be separate from this. If people are genuinely sick and cannot work they absolutely should be supported through the benefits system.

As for the other work shirkers…there should be a max time limit for claiming benefits then they get cut off.

Used to know somebody who couldn't work because of illness but could manage to stand and move about in the middle of a sports field 3 nights a week for 'expnses' [hour and a half at a time] and could referee cricket at weekends.
The whole family, loads of kids, none of them worked.
There are, of course, genuine people who cannot work.

BeachRide · 12/01/2025 17:15

QueenOfHiraeth · 12/01/2025 16:49

I'm also from an area where some of us (friends and family) grew up and went to work where others went to claim benefits. As we approach retirement, those of us who worked have better lives overall than those who didn't - most of us own our homes, have pension provision above the state pension and our children are mostly making their way more successfully. The state is making a rod for all of our backs as the more people are given, the more they need in the long term.

Outside of those people from my childhood the one incident that really showed a flaw in the system was someone I knew whose husband was a very wealthy business owner, they lived in a large 6 bedroom detached house on a private road, very nice cars, holidays, etc and had 3 children in private school. One child developed T1 diabetes and mother then claimed a benefit that was not means-tested and, apparently, they were entitled to as the child needed help and supervision to manage their condition. The fact that mother did not work (never had through choice and no need) and the child was actually having county level trials for a sport they played was irrelevant

David Cameron claimed DLA for his disabled son 🤷‍♂️

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread