Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder how people will find jobs in their late 60s?

176 replies

Notcontent · 20/12/2024 08:05

i was just thinking about pension ages, prompted by the Waspi thread and also fact that I spend a lot of time worrying about my own retirement.

i know the pension age has to rise but at the same time I think it will create even more inequality. There will be people with private pensions who can retire at 55 and then those who can’t - and are likely to struggle to stay employed until they can get the state pension - which is likely to be 70 soon.

i my professional job there is an expectation that people retire at around 55. There are no people in their 60s. When I look at people employed in retail, etc I also only see people in their early 60s maximum.

how is someone aged 65 supposed to find a new job?

if anything, I feel like there is more ageism now than ever before. Particularly in relation to older women.

OP posts:
WillowTit · 22/12/2024 07:51

why does that affect those in their 60s?

Bluebellsnbowbells · 22/12/2024 08:07

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 07:01

i dont understand the argument against workers retiring before 68 and being supported by younger people?
in what way are they being supported?
are people assuming that under 68 people are living on benefits?

Well the state pension is exactly that - a benefit.

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 08:09

come off it, people claim a state pension,
it is not counted as a benefit
but it still has not answered my question

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 22/12/2024 08:20

Many of us will end up under employed and unable to make those last important years contributions to our work place pensions.
My workplace pension is a reasonable one and I’m lucky to have it however I am on a low salary so I predict it will tip me over some kind of threshold and people who haven’t saved for a pension will end up better off than me. I was also diagnosed with early onset arthritis in my thirties and will very likely need a double hip replacement. The wait for this is likely to damage my employment prospects too.

Gettingbysomehow · 22/12/2024 08:24

I work in the NHS I'm allowed to work until 75 if I am well enough and we are always short staffed. I'm a podiatrist and I plan to retire at 67 and do a couple of days on the bank a week.
There are loads of other jobs in admin and various other departments. All on the NHS website.

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 08:25

Gettingbysomehow · 22/12/2024 08:24

I work in the NHS I'm allowed to work until 75 if I am well enough and we are always short staffed. I'm a podiatrist and I plan to retire at 67 and do a couple of days on the bank a week.
There are loads of other jobs in admin and various other departments. All on the NHS website.

are you not allowed after 75?
i worked with a health care assistant in the nhs who was 80

Gettingbysomehow · 22/12/2024 08:26

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 22/12/2024 08:20

Many of us will end up under employed and unable to make those last important years contributions to our work place pensions.
My workplace pension is a reasonable one and I’m lucky to have it however I am on a low salary so I predict it will tip me over some kind of threshold and people who haven’t saved for a pension will end up better off than me. I was also diagnosed with early onset arthritis in my thirties and will very likely need a double hip replacement. The wait for this is likely to damage my employment prospects too.

Thanks to generous NHS sick pay I've had 9 months off in total for my hip replacements. Full pay and a couple of months half pay which is more like 3/4 pay once they add on stat sick pay too.

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 22/12/2024 08:29

@Gettingbysomehow its not the time off for the ops themselves that worries me it’s the period on then waiting list where I will likely be dismissed from my job as it is an outdoors active role and I wouldn’t be able to carry it out.

1apenny2apenny · 22/12/2024 08:49

I think the government half hoped people in the late 50's + would fill all the jobs - the low paid jobs. However they underestimated people, many would rather cut back and cope after all we are the generation who didn't have all this extra 'stuff' so can do frugle.

I also think that unless you are particularly skilled you end up only having min wage jobs as options with employers getting all the benefits of your experience and you getting very few benefits as imo working conditions are worse now than they've ever been. If you get state pension (imo not a benefit, I've paid in, A LOT) then you'll be taxed in your nmw job. Factor in the costs if travelling to and from work, the shitty way people treat many employees and it starts to look very unattractive.

It's interesting that someone down thread mentioned about over 50's being off on 'sick'. It's endemic in this country and too easy, those magic words 'mental health' and there's no need to work. I expect the 18-26 and 55+ are the biggest group in this category, after all they keep being told they must have 'mental health'.

Lastly we need to stop comparing the UK to the likes of NZ with its very low population <6m with very low/no immigrants. It's a completely different ball game.

PissedOffNeighbour22 · 22/12/2024 09:11

@Ginmonkeyagain firefighters don't retire at 55. It's currently 60 but will most likely rise again before my DP gets to retire. His back and hips cause him trouble already so no chance of him being able to still lift people twice his weight at that age.

DP's mum is still working full time in her 70s in a school but is still fairly fit and healthy. I work in the CS and have witnessed multiple people over 60 being hounded out.

PissedOffNeighbour22 · 22/12/2024 09:19

@1apenny2apenny totally agree with this. My dad always intended to get a part time job once he retired but decided against it as there isn't much benefit to doing so once you factor in tax and travel costs. His job begged him to go back part time but he said no.

My mum (long divorced from my dad) on the other hand is one of the others you mentioned - those that are claiming they are too ill to work. She's worked a handful of years in her life, claimed to be too ill to work (I doubt this) and is now claiming a full pension despite paying sod all in during her lifetime. She lived off her husband until he died a few years ago when she went onto benefits and PIP for a couple of years before 'retirement'.

ismu · 22/12/2024 09:55

I've taken my teaching pension after 30 years of service. That's also 30 years of paying a third of my salary into a scheme which is now paying back what I saved. I can reasonably expect to live off this for another 30 years. Consultancy, supply or other work don't make sense as tax hammers the pension income.
I'd literally need to go back to work full time to a senior position before I was better off.
Lots of people are in this position- and most of them have retired because teaching is such an incredibly toxic workplace for older women ( NOT because of the children!!)

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 10:04

@ismu is that because younger staff are eyeing up the more senior roles that are taken by the older staff?

Meadowfinch · 22/12/2024 10:06

westisbest1982 · 20/12/2024 11:16

Ageism has always been there but what I worry about more is the increasing automation in workplaces, therefore squeezing out humans. Ten years ago or more it was easy to get a job in a supermarket, now not so much.

Admin roles aren’t as plentiful as they once were either, partly because of A.I. I think we should all be concerned about the adverse impact with A.I on jobs in general, particularly in an increasingly individualistic society.

@westisbest1982 I wouldn't worry too much.

In 1981 when I left school we were all told that automation. (the incoming Pc/IT revolution) would take all our jobs and we'd all have to cut back to three days a week. They actually did a major project on how to keep people busy 😂😂

I'm still working flat out 43 years later.

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 10:30

i dont type letters anymore, i dont often print and post, i process them
my banding could well be reduced to this automaton

Gettingbysomehow · 22/12/2024 10:42

WillowTit · 22/12/2024 08:25

are you not allowed after 75?
i worked with a health care assistant in the nhs who was 80

It isn't advised. My manager said 75.

Gettingbysomehow · 22/12/2024 10:45

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 22/12/2024 08:29

@Gettingbysomehow its not the time off for the ops themselves that worries me it’s the period on then waiting list where I will likely be dismissed from my job as it is an outdoors active role and I wouldn’t be able to carry it out.

Here we can go private paid for by NHS and the waiting list is 4 weeks.

MidnightMeltdown · 22/12/2024 10:53

I can’t imagine this will be possible for people who are currently in their 30’s early 40’s. Without a massive cash injection most people will still be paying mortgages or aren’t well paid enough or have generous pensions schemes to be able to retire.

@User37482

I dunno, Millennials are expected to be the richest generation in history once the money starts trickling down from Baby Boomers. Of course some will get nothing, but I don't think that will be the majority by any means.

MidnightMeltdown · 22/12/2024 11:05

Startinganew32 · 20/12/2024 08:44

What job do you work where everyone retires at 55? Is it police or forces? Because in most other jobs, especially office based roles, people carry on working, often full time. Where I work, at a university, there are plenty of professors in their 70s. It’s only on Mumsnet that I see lots of youngish people claiming that they won’t be able to work past 60 because their body will disintegrate.

How does that work then? You start proper work at 24 or so (presuming you went to uni, which is increasingly the case, and then having a few years out). Then you retire at 55, so about 30 years of full working life. Then you die at 85, so 30 years of retirement. So for two thirds of your life you’re economically inactive and you expect that to be okay financially.

Yes but most university professors that I've known have remained fairly fit and healthy. I mostly work from home and make an effort to exercise and stay within the healthy weight range, but when I occasionally go into the office I am shocked at how many of my colleagues are hugely overweight, including fairly young people in their 30s.

They look worryingly unhealthy, especially for their age, so perhaps that's why they feel like their bodies will disintegrate!! Sounds awful, but it wouldn't surprise me if many of them don't make it much beyond 55.

ismu · 22/12/2024 14:09

@WillowTit no- more like most older staff have the knowledge and experience to challenge careerist managerial bullshit from 25 year old head teachers that doesn't help children.

StormingNorman · 22/12/2024 14:11

The news that we are healthy to work until older age hasn’t reached employers recruiting for staff yet. It still seems almost impossible to get a good move after your late 50s.

w0nderwall · 22/12/2024 14:14

I’d have thought it’s not the working after 50/60 - it’s the getting hired. The state pension age is now later so I guess we’ll need to adapt.

TheignT · 22/12/2024 14:20

Winterwonderland24 · 20/12/2024 08:40

If you try to move into ‘shop work’ having retired from a professional job you’ve got no chance. I have applied to all the major stores and they are not interested.

In my profession people retire early and a few years ago everyone over 50 was made redundant in a major reorganisation. Only a couple of people found permanent work after that.

At my local supermarket, well one of them, there is a retired college lecturer working part time. His old students always call him Prof and he seems happy and very sociable. Maybe different stores have different policies or might vary with local recruiting so if you are in an area with high unemployment it might be harder.

TheignT · 22/12/2024 14:50

ForGreyKoala · 20/12/2024 21:47

I think the retirement age should have been phased in yearly.. not just one big jump.

I'm not in the UK, but that's how they deal with increased superannuation age here. It hasn't changed in years, but occasionally a government will discuss it, and it's always as a gradual change, so those who were due to claim superannuation in the following year or so can still do so, and others would have plenty of advance warning and time to adjust.

Edited

It was gradual here, announced in 1995 and started in 2010 with the change spread over the next few years. It didn't go from 60 to 66 overnight.

Mrsbloggz · 22/12/2024 14:52

Is it partly because older people are often more canny and employers would prefer younger people who are easier to mold and manipulate?