I live in a very diverse area. One of our services that used to be Council funded is now run by volunteers. I think they have done a great job of providing the core service and they also run additional events. I believe they receive grants for this so although volunteers aren’t paid, the service is at least part-funded by the taxpayer. The issue is that the volunteers are almost all from the same demographic. Great that they are involved, but I’m concerned from my experience that the organisers aren’t making an effort to recruit volunteers that represent the diversity of our community.
I have a long-term (physical) health condition and am of a different age bracket to most of the volunteers. I was open when I applied to volunteer that my physical health means I can’t do long shifts. However, I’m passionate about the service and have relevant skills and experience. They trained me up on the basis I would volunteer to help with the core service and some additional events. However, when it came to it, there weren’t willing to be flexible at all with the shifts or put in place any other adjustments e.g. rest break so that I could volunteer in the core service.
It seems to me that it’s important to have a diversity of volunteers and that by excluding people the offering won’t necessarily reflect what different groups in the community need. I imagine others will also have been put off by this inflexibility.
YABU -it’s voluntary service so suck it up
YANBU-there should be flexibility and inclusivity, especially if the service is taxpayer funded
Interested to gauge views!