I used to manage the software allowing people to work from home, this was only for certain days, usually a Friday.
We monitored mouse movement and login data and sleep mode and initially did not share this with the business or let people know we were doing this.
We found that mouse movement and sleep mode monitoring demonstrated 5 times more activity for people in the office than those at home, we had a few people who never logged in from home.
When we advertised the fact that we were doing this and passed the data to the business it changed to about half as much activity at home as opposed to 20%.
We had open table discussions and it was hilarious seeing people who had never logged in or had minimal activity saying how more productive they were at home, data does not lie my view is that unless people have something that is completely measurable WFH means working less and is better for the employee not the business or the customer.
if everyone was more productive at home then this would mean more work was being done and less people would be needed and mass unemployment would take place and this the reason cited p, has this happened ? Of course not.
My view is many people tell porkys about how they work at home for fear of having this benefit taken away. So don’t kid yourself or think you are hoodwinking others, again unless it’s completely measurable people who work from home do less than they would in the office.