I 100% believe in obeying parking restrictions and generally agree that we give too much public space to cars. However I have been long-term unwell and sometimes driving is the only way I get to do things.
NB this is for a council-enforced penalty. The rules and processes for penalties for parking on private land are different and probably irrelevant here.
This was for a relative's birthday lunch. See diagram. The light grey shows the footpath with the side-path pointing up in the image being the path to the restaurant. I arrived from the left, and passed the first bay which was clearly marked with lots of paint on the road as "LOADING ONLY" but further on there was another bay with no such markings, 2 cars already parked in it, and a parking pay-machine (purple rectangle) nearby. Blue cars are other cars, I am the red car. I parked and sent my teenager to go and get the parking location number for RingGo off the machine.
I log into Ringo and pay for 2 hours parking and we walk to the restaurant and have a lovely lunch.
On returning to the car there is a penalty notice, saying I had parked in a Loading Only area. On searching the area I find a tiny "loading only" notice on a pole where the small brown circle is in my diagram. I had not seen that when I parked because the view of it was blocked by the 2 cars already parked there. There was no "loading only" paint on the road where I had parked.
On the one hand it's a fair cop, I should have checked for signage that this was a legitimate parking space, I took the existence of the parking machine to mean it was OK and I can see in retrospect that this was inadequate.
On the other hand the massive amount of attention drawn to the fact that the other bay was loading only makes this feel unfair because it doesn't feel like an unreasonable assumption that the unpainted area had a different status than the painted area.
AIBU to appeal and has anyone had any success with an appeal like this due to inadequate signage?