Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation £1000 per employee

542 replies

flashbac · 01/11/2024 06:41

The NI changes are going to cost my organisation on average £1000 per employee, The lowering of the threshold alone is going to cost around £600 extra per employee.

We are heavily regulated with fixed income. We're a not for profit. Our customers expectations are increasing. We are now most likely going to have to somehow reduce our headcount now, and payrises for April are going to be off the table.

Just shaking my head really. Our employees don't deserve this. Hard to see how this isn't a tax on jobs.

The lowering of the threshold also means employers have to pay for more workers, because part time salaries are now dragged into it.

A lot of people reading this won't care. All I can say is this NI increase will also affect you. just think about Local authorities, childcare providers and other services. Do you think it won't affect your Councils services/tax bills, to give one example?

(I'm not a Tory bot btw, before anyone starts accusing me of being one. I voted Remain, don't support the Tories at all, can't stand Boris and his cronies.)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:26

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:24

Your response below to redundancies and lower pay was that you were ok with it, but how do they help growth?

If I had the answer to all these problems, I'd be applying to be Chancellor myself. The economy is basically a circle that can't be squared.

Bromptotoo · 01/11/2024 11:26

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

I think they backed themselves into a corner.

With hindsight opposition to Hunt's last cut for employees as wholly without principle and a commitment to reverse it would have been better.

But it would have been a stick for the Tories to beat them with...

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:26

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/11/2024 11:22

Indeed…it’s an unashamed increase in tax on employment, impacting low margin organisations with large numbers of employees the most.

Agreed

USA and Germany are trying to re-industrialise, meanwhile we're putting the nail in the coffin and getting rid of non-doms, and foreign property investors too.

So I guess our economy is going to be based on selling each other houses.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:27

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:26

Agreed

USA and Germany are trying to re-industrialise, meanwhile we're putting the nail in the coffin and getting rid of non-doms, and foreign property investors too.

So I guess our economy is going to be based on selling each other houses.

Quite. It's actually pathetic.

Twistybranch · 01/11/2024 11:28

I honestly wouldn’t worry.

Theres going to be a u-turns galore on this budget. She’s already spooked the markets. Moody’s are issuing warnings. Charities are panicking…..it’s a complete shit show.

At least we know they will take a hammering at the next local elections and will be out at the next GE. So just a case of getting through the next few years.

Hopefully then they will recognise that a centrist approach is the only way that Labour can work.

devilsadvocate77 · 01/11/2024 11:29

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 10:53

I'm struggling to understand why people don't think it should come from tech companies making huge profits. They are effectively the ones replacing people's jobs in order to make these profits and take the money that used to be taxed from those jobs out of the system, so why aren't they the ones being made to put it back into the system.

Doesn't seem like Labour have any interest in working people when they're just going to continue to allow this to happen.

Edited

Yes, happy for tech companies or multinational/global firms but it is really not hitting those, though, are they.
Again, we are taxed something like 10% less individually than other European nations.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:30

AnonymousBleep · 01/11/2024 11:26

If I had the answer to all these problems, I'd be applying to be Chancellor myself. The economy is basically a circle that can't be squared.

I'm afraid not thinking redundancies and lower pay will help growth is a basic requirement for the Chancellor, and even if mners can't see it Reeves should be able to.

Even if some think favourably enough of Labour that they overlook those things happening (even to them) it really will be problematic for growth and all the pledges that rest on it. Including defence spending

Ilovemycatalot · 01/11/2024 11:30

The problem is everyone wants improved services but no one wants to pay for it.
I would of been happy with a direct tax on everyone with the money going direct to the NHS with those earning more taxed more.

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:32

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:25

UK manufacturing and farming.

Why on earth would they want to impact two things that provide a certain level of security?

Mumsnetters are constantly going on about how brilliant Germany is and manufacturing and farming are two highly protected industries there.

It was the same when they chose not to renew our Nuclear power station capability because it was "cheaper" to import electricity than build our own replacement infrastructure.

Same with the loss of the manufacturing industries in the 70s and 80s. Again "cheaper" to outsource our manufacturing to the emerging cheap workforces of the Eastern countries.

No one is in it for the long term anymore. By the time the inevitable shit hits the fan, i.e. Ukraine, Covid, Suez, etc., the politicians making short term decisions years ago are long retired and enjoying their gold plated pensions, consultancy fees, etc., so they can just shrug it off.

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:35

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:27

Quite. It's actually pathetic.

Our economy has been based on buying/selling houses and the service economy of coffees and spa days for 2 or 3 decades now. All on the flawed assumption we can easily and cheaply import what we need, whether food, goods or power. Now we can all see the folly of that short-sightedness but still the politicians can't change their flawed mindset and just carry on making the same mistakes.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:35

Twistybranch · 01/11/2024 11:28

I honestly wouldn’t worry.

Theres going to be a u-turns galore on this budget. She’s already spooked the markets. Moody’s are issuing warnings. Charities are panicking…..it’s a complete shit show.

At least we know they will take a hammering at the next local elections and will be out at the next GE. So just a case of getting through the next few years.

Hopefully then they will recognise that a centrist approach is the only way that Labour can work.

Edited

Moody’s are issuing warnings

Wonder what Labour will do next

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:36

devilsadvocate77 · 01/11/2024 11:29

Yes, happy for tech companies or multinational/global firms but it is really not hitting those, though, are they.
Again, we are taxed something like 10% less individually than other European nations.

Yep, tech companies have the broad shoulders, but they're not really impacted this much by this. Just don't understand why they didn't go for Corporation tax.

IdaGlossop · 01/11/2024 11:36

CoralReader · 01/11/2024 07:35

Now is a good time to start supporting the tories then

On what basis? It is a party battered at the polls in July and with, as yet, no leader and no policies.

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:37

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:35

Our economy has been based on buying/selling houses and the service economy of coffees and spa days for 2 or 3 decades now. All on the flawed assumption we can easily and cheaply import what we need, whether food, goods or power. Now we can all see the folly of that short-sightedness but still the politicians can't change their flawed mindset and just carry on making the same mistakes.

Agreed. We actually had some promise for maker industry resurgence in the late 2010s with lots of young people starting to create small manufacturing businesses but it got crippled by the high cost of housing post Covid.

Toastandbutterand · 01/11/2024 11:40

I think it's worth noting that of all the different finance institutions assessments of this budget, the worst assessment, the very worst one said:

It's nearly as bad as the conservatives would have been.

mrshoho · 01/11/2024 11:44

Toastandbutterand · 01/11/2024 11:40

I think it's worth noting that of all the different finance institutions assessments of this budget, the worst assessment, the very worst one said:

It's nearly as bad as the conservatives would have been.

Good point. And I keep reminding myself of the fact that the Conservatives were only offering more of the same at the last GE. I lalso agree that reducing NI at the time they did it was irresponsible.

EasternStandard · 01/11/2024 11:46

mrshoho · 01/11/2024 11:44

Good point. And I keep reminding myself of the fact that the Conservatives were only offering more of the same at the last GE. I lalso agree that reducing NI at the time they did it was irresponsible.

Labour and the other parties voted against Sunak's increase in NI at the time anyway.

mimbleandlittlemy · 01/11/2024 11:52

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 01/11/2024 08:17

Will the extra billions given to the NHS cover their increased NI liabilities? I doubt it will.

The NHS and public sector are exempt from the NI increases, @ByQuaintAzureWasp, but stupidly GPs, care homes and hospices won't be.

FelixtheAardvark · 01/11/2024 11:53

We've had 14 years of supposedly "pro-business" governments and look at the mess we are in.

In the circumstances it is a remarkably good budget.

yeaitsmeagain · 01/11/2024 11:54

flashbac · 01/11/2024 08:39

Did you not read the information about the reduced thresholds? It's not just a percentage increase. More is being paid due to threshold lowering.

Yes but the Employers' Allowance is doubling.

Your math isn't mathing, unless your employees really are on 180k each.

Brananan · 01/11/2024 11:56

Ilovemycatalot · 01/11/2024 11:30

The problem is everyone wants improved services but no one wants to pay for it.
I would of been happy with a direct tax on everyone with the money going direct to the NHS with those earning more taxed more.

People who have private health and use private schools are proven to be happy to pay for improved services.

friendlycat · 01/11/2024 11:57

taxguru · 01/11/2024 11:35

Our economy has been based on buying/selling houses and the service economy of coffees and spa days for 2 or 3 decades now. All on the flawed assumption we can easily and cheaply import what we need, whether food, goods or power. Now we can all see the folly of that short-sightedness but still the politicians can't change their flawed mindset and just carry on making the same mistakes.

This in spades.

It's refreshing reading your posts as you clearly understand the dynamics of economics and business.

I also think there are too many who really do not understand, or refuse to admit, the catastrophic nature of what Brexit did to this country.

Relearningbehaviour · 01/11/2024 12:02

Yanbu. We are already discussing folding our companies. Or we need to get rid of staff. We can't afford the extra costs any more.
So in doing this people are going to be losing jobs.

Yes money needs to come from somewhere. But this wasn't the way. Tax profits, sure. Don't tax us for basically employing people.

A lot of unemployment coming our way again!

friendlycat · 01/11/2024 12:04

I also think they may well have to reconsider what they have imposed on farmers and u turn on this. Pretty much like George Osbourne's pasty tax.

We need farmers producing food and livestock for this country. We don't produce enough as it is and rely heavily on importing.

If farmers can't pass down their farms through the next generation without these huge taxes that have just been applied, they will have to sell. Less farming just means less produce = more imports.

taxguru · 01/11/2024 12:13

TheTidyBear · 01/11/2024 11:36

Yep, tech companies have the broad shoulders, but they're not really impacted this much by this. Just don't understand why they didn't go for Corporation tax.

Corporation has has already been increased from 19% to 25%. That's already quite a hike!!