Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To want a budget which puts young people and families first

385 replies

HFJ · 28/10/2024 19:59

In advance of an upcoming budget that will likely hammer working people (again, despite the rhetoric), I’m consoling myself by imagining my own budget. You’ll notice a theme. This is because I believe young people and families are the future, deserve to have hope, aspirations and goals. Please feel free to contribute.

  1. The first 5 years of young people’s full time earnings to be tax and NI free. This would enable all to save for a house deposit, rather than only the few who inherit. Imagine the incentive to work hard!
  2. No increases to any tax that primarily affects working age people, including fuel tax (because working people need fuel to go to work)
  3. No stamp duty for young people and those with children under 18. This enables them a fairer chance of buying property rather than have to compete unfairly with cash buyers
  4. Complete removal of the pension tax free cash allowance. This is because 100s of 1000s are poised to take their 25% lump sum and plough this into the property market (tbf I think the gov has got wind of this, hence the landlord tax changes)
  5. instead of massive increases to NHS budget (which does not really benefit the young or families), a £10 charge to see the doctor, so people start to take ownership for their health
  6. Removal of the free prescription for over 60s. Instead, use this money to bring back the school nurse and perhaps even school dentist visits

Any other ideas?

OP posts:
notbelieved · 29/10/2024 16:50

taxguru · 29/10/2024 16:28

The statistics showed that the older groups voted for Brexit and the younger groups voted for Remain.

But I didn’t vote for that. So stop blaming older people. End of. Plenty of younger people voted for Brexit. Maybe have a go at them?

Nogaxeh · 29/10/2024 16:50

People wouldn't need to save up so much money for a deposit if house prices weren't insane. Build millions of homes.

People buying a house would have less to worry about from cash buyers if the housing market wasn't such a seller's market due to under supply. Build millions of homes.

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 16:52

But I didn’t vote for that. So stop blaming older people. End of. Plenty of younger people voted for Brexit. Maybe have a go at them?

That posters was talking statistically though…

Soukmyfalafel · 29/10/2024 17:10

I think if you solve housing issues for families and young people then the rest follows. The first place this country fell flat on its face was when homes became investments rather than somewhere to live. The best start in life is a secure home and a means to move around the country without having to think too much about whether you can afford to live there.

Both Labour and Tories fucked this up and were too thick to realise this, but Tories probably a bit more.

notbelieved · 29/10/2024 17:10

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 16:52

But I didn’t vote for that. So stop blaming older people. End of. Plenty of younger people voted for Brexit. Maybe have a go at them?

That posters was talking statistically though…

Sure. statistically a huge percentage of people aged 50 or over didn’t vote for Brexit. Statistically a significant portion of young people voted for Brexit.

It’s easy to turn around. Lots of older people also have young adult children and are well aware of the issues facing young people and their families. Those same young people who seem unable to recognise the hardships we went through (there were many, not necessarily the same as now) but expect the over 50s to give up their homes, any financial security they may have been able to achieve and forgo any kind of healthcare so we drop dead ASAP.

Katypp · 29/10/2024 17:28

I think the generation raising children now seem to think they have a monopoly on hardship and no other generation has ever had issues but them.
Every generation has problems. I am 57 and houses were cheaper and easier to mortgage in the 80s when I bought, but interest rate rises were horrific.
My parents bought a post-war semi on one wage but struggled at times as you had to live within your means with no easy credit to fall back on.
To the OP - you will be 50+ in no time at all. I think you will see things differently then

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 17:36

Those same young people who seem unable to recognise the hardships we went through (there were many, not necessarily the same as now) but expect the over 50s to give up their homes, any financial security they may have been able to achieve and forgo any kind of healthcare so we drop dead ASAP.

How many young people statistically think that? 😆

saltinesandcoffeecups · 29/10/2024 18:04

taxguru · 29/10/2024 15:21

The fact that public services are generally poor with purchasing decisions doesn't make the idea wrong. Perhaps they need to engage better procurement practices, and actually aim for value for money and competitive pricing, rather than being conned by suppliers who rely on their lack of experience and poor knowledge of purchasing procedures. It's amazing how much better deals that private firms manage to get despite far lower purchasing power. Same with the NHS, not just schools. They're far too easily manipulated and conned into accepting expensive contracts and deliberately false price lists etc.

Can’t they do that now with the money they currently get?

daliesque · 29/10/2024 18:28

SweetcornSoup · 29/10/2024 16:05

I think you should come back when you're over fifty and reread what you have written, see if you've changed your stance

Edited

Especially as those of us over 50 grew up in Thatchers Britain. That was fun for young people.

daliesque · 29/10/2024 18:32

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 16:42

People who didn’t vote can’t be included in vote statistics. In the Brexit vote, older people were more likely to vote Brexit.

Edited

No but if some of the mostly younger people who couldn't be arsed to vote got off their backsides and did so, then we could have had a different outcome.

taxguru · 29/10/2024 18:36

Nogaxeh · 29/10/2024 16:50

People wouldn't need to save up so much money for a deposit if house prices weren't insane. Build millions of homes.

People buying a house would have less to worry about from cash buyers if the housing market wasn't such a seller's market due to under supply. Build millions of homes.

We can't "build millions of homes". There isn't the infrastructure, there aren't the tradesmen. It's too simplistic.

Far better would be to bring existing homes back into residential use by targeting empty properties, attacking second home, holiday home and holiday let owners, attacking foreign investors who have homes that have been empty since the day they were built, incentivising conversion of derelict retail and industrial properties, do something about all the empty floors above High Street shops, etc etc. Existing properties already have the infrastructure so it should be a quick and easy process to bring them back into use - just needs the political will.

taxguru · 29/10/2024 18:38

saltinesandcoffeecups · 29/10/2024 18:04

Can’t they do that now with the money they currently get?

You'd think so, but they seem incapable of even realising that there's a problem, let alone finding a solution. They're too busy congratulating themselves for getting 10% of list price of, say, the stationery catalogue, when everyone else gets 50% off!

Nogaxeh · 29/10/2024 18:44

taxguru · 29/10/2024 18:36

We can't "build millions of homes". There isn't the infrastructure, there aren't the tradesmen. It's too simplistic.

Far better would be to bring existing homes back into residential use by targeting empty properties, attacking second home, holiday home and holiday let owners, attacking foreign investors who have homes that have been empty since the day they were built, incentivising conversion of derelict retail and industrial properties, do something about all the empty floors above High Street shops, etc etc. Existing properties already have the infrastructure so it should be a quick and easy process to bring them back into use - just needs the political will.

Build the infrastructure, train the tradesmen. Britain built millions of houses in the past it can do so again.

It will take a while, but it took decades to get into this mess. You wouldn't expect to be able to fix it with one budget.

Wingedharpy · 29/10/2024 18:58

taxguru · 29/10/2024 15:26

Exactly, why "should" it improve? There are no signs and no reasons for any sudden improvement in the nation's finances. All signs are showing a one way direction of travel. It's not just the UK, it's the entire developed Western World. There's a shift of World wealth away from the West to the East and Middle East. The best that Western economies and governments can do is some kind of managed decline to try to avoid huge economic crashes. All empires have suffered this - Russian, Egyptian, Roman, Greek, etc - all had their periods of being major "super-powers" and all ended up collapsing. Britain and the rest of Europe, North America, Australia, etc WILL go the same way. We've "peaked" and there's only one direction of travel now.

Scarily, I think you are right @taxguru .
I'm so glad I'm old.

Naunet · 29/10/2024 19:09

GoldCat255 · 29/10/2024 15:23

YANBU by any stretch of the imagination. The younger generations are now having to deal with an unprecedented recession caused by the major fuck-up that Brexit has been. They did not vote for this shit and now they are paying the consequences. So yes OP, I am with you. They need to be prioritised.

The same as every single generation before them has had to deal with choices previous generations made?! I’m so sick of this victim narrative. Yes, some things are harder for young people than previous generations, and some things are a hell of a lot easier. The fact is younger generations today are more pampered, have more luxury and more opportunities than any generation before them.

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 20:10

The fact is younger generations today are more pampered, have more luxury and more opportunities than any generation before them.

What opportunities? To get on the housing ladder? To build equity if one is on the housing ladder? To have access to a great pension scheme? Salaries that grow in line with inflation or at least don’t stagnant? Or do you mean opportunities like watching lots of different TV streaming services?

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 20:14

No but if some of the mostly younger people who couldn't be arsed to vote got off their backsides and did so, then we could have had a different outcome

@daliesque why do you think most didn’t vote & the outcome would have been different?

YellowAsteroid · 29/10/2024 20:14

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 16:31

interest rates started to rise and only stopped at 15%

interest rates of 15% are similar to interest rates of 5% in terms of impact on household finances. This is because house prices are higher than in the past.

Salaries are higher than the past.

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 20:24

Salaries are higher than the past.

Why wouldn’t they be? Have they kept up with inflation though?

Plus house prices vs salary ratio is also higher. 5% of a big mortgage is not that different to 15% of a smaller amount.

Mlanket · 29/10/2024 20:24

I’ll answer that for you

“Real wages grew by an average of 33% each decade from 1970 to 2007; but they are now back at the level they were at in 2005, according to data from the Office for National Statistics, ONS (Times, 2023).
Indeed, the Resolution Foundation calculates that after 15 years of stagnation, average earnings are £230 below the trend before the global financial crisis of 2007-09 (BBC, 2023).”

Woman looking at items in a supermarket

Stalling wage growth since 2008 costs £11,000 a year, says think tank

A think tank examined what wages might be if the growth seen before the 2008 crash had not fallen away.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64970708

JudgeJ · 29/10/2024 20:30

IVFmumoftwo · 29/10/2024 11:51

Not sure about that. If it pays an electric bill or food shopping for the family isn't it not benefiting the children?

Yes of course those things benefit the children but it would be very naive to think that no-one ever wastes their benefits on things which do not benefit their children.

redtrain123 · 29/10/2024 21:26

I was a teen during the early nineties recession. People went into negative equality with their houses. There was mass redundancies - three million unemployed. Graduate and sSchool leaver jobs disappeared overnight. It was a scary time and times were tough.

Life hasn’t always been easy.

runningpram · 29/10/2024 21:51

Angrymum22 · 28/10/2024 23:33

No need for pensions so effectively eliminate the state pension scheme.
However most people over 50 are earning well and more likely to be paying higher rates of tax. So what you save in pensions you lose on tax.
You are obviously under 30 since you consider 50 an age where life is no longer worth living.
You would also remove most peoples childcare.
Sorry didn’t quote the post that suggested euthanising the over 50s.

Edited

Err that was a joke…

runningpram · 29/10/2024 21:58

I am probably quite a lot closer to 50 than the op and I absolutely agree with the basic principle. Pandering to largely older Brexity, Tory-types ( and that is a demographic fact) has led this country to the brink. It’s time to prioritise other demographics - that doesn’t mean shafting older people but it does making them less front and centre in policy making - so re-designing triple lock, removing the no NI exemption for pensioners etc.
By older people I mean c67 plus - not people of working age.

Houseplanter · 29/10/2024 22:11

How many young people are doing 5 long shifts a week, plus an overtime shift at the weekend, with the other adult working unsociable hours around their DH because there's no childcare available... free or otherwise.

Just to pay the mortgage and utilities.

Because that's what we did in the 80s and 90s.