Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not allowing heavily pregnant woman to use a loo

665 replies

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 10:38

I’m imminently due my third baby and have a massive bump. Popped to the local coop post school run and as I was checking out was desperate for the loo. My pelvic floor is pretty shot from previous 2 kids, the baby had dropped during the school run walk so I was feeling like I could not wait. The store was empty bar a couple of pensioners. I asked if I could use the staff loo as desperate, there are no other loos nearby and I was unlikely to make it the half a mile home in time. The member of staff said no against policy and I soiled myself before I even made it the front door of the shop. Completely humiliating and had to walk home like that and could have been avoided if a little kindness shown.

AIBU to expect some flexibility in branch policy to accommodate for those in need? It hardly fits with the coop key value of caring for others.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Cattenberg · 08/10/2024 17:41

PonkyPonky · 08/10/2024 15:25

This just highlights the desperate need for more public toilets. Even one loo in every town centre would make a massive difference. I’m not incontinent but since having children I have to plan not to have anything to drink if I’m going anywhere without a loo! Women are disproportionately affected by the lack of public toilets so nobody in charge really cares

I recently rode on an vintage tourist tram, and the driver gave us a commentary on the sights. When we stopped at an old rural station, the tram driver pointed out a small wrought iron structure which turned out to be a Victorian urinal. He explained that there were no toilet facilities for women as Victorian women apparently didn’t need such things!

I’m not sure what the rationale was there. Were women expected to hold it, to give the illusion of having no bodily functions? Were they supposed to stay at home, except for a short daily stroll, perhaps? Or did some Victorian men honestly believe that women were mechanised dollies?

RedHelenB · 08/10/2024 17:41

Was very grateful coming out of covid era that a young man allowed me to use Asda loo when i was desperate. But if he'd said no I'd have understood Our local co op would let us, but then they know all the customers

Nightsleeper129 · 08/10/2024 17:41

NeedToChangeName · 08/10/2024 10:42

I sympathise, must have been awful, but I wouldn't criticise the shop for this

We should have more public toilets

This

Nightsleeper129 · 08/10/2024 17:44

Cattenberg · 08/10/2024 17:41

I recently rode on an vintage tourist tram, and the driver gave us a commentary on the sights. When we stopped at an old rural station, the tram driver pointed out a small wrought iron structure which turned out to be a Victorian urinal. He explained that there were no toilet facilities for women as Victorian women apparently didn’t need such things!

I’m not sure what the rationale was there. Were women expected to hold it, to give the illusion of having no bodily functions? Were they supposed to stay at home, except for a short daily stroll, perhaps? Or did some Victorian men honestly believe that women were mechanised dollies?

https://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/History-of-Womens-Public-Toilets-in-Britain/

The History of Women's Public Toilets in Britain - Historic UK

In Victorian Britain, most public toilets were designed for men and there were very few women's toilets available. Therefore women could never travel far, only to family and friends. This restriction of women's movements is often referred to as the ‘ur...

https://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/History-of-Womens-Public-Toilets-in-Britain

grannypants22 · 08/10/2024 17:45

Some cunty comments of the highest order on this thread.
Yes insurance, bla bla bla. There is a reasonable explanation for it but to stick the boot into the op when she's had such a horrible experience is vile.
Having had urgency issues in the past I know only too well the sheer panic of needing the loo and not being able to access one and knowing that if you don't find somewhere quick you're going to be in a horrible, humiliating situation.
Some of you have clearly had a huge empathy bypass.

eggandonion · 08/10/2024 17:46

In almost 30 years of working in retail...not food or clothing...I have never been told that under no circumstances should a customer be allowed a trip to the toilet for insurance reasons.
I can send people to the pub opposite. Or if a child or pregnant woman looks desperate I can use my discretion.
It happens very seldom, and mostly it is a toddler doing the dance they do.
I live in a small town and know all the toilets and bushes, as a pp said...I have 3 kids. Lidl staff are very helpful, which is counter intuitive. Our local community centre has a lot of 'for customer use only ' signs despite being beside a playground.
I'm actually pretty horrified at a lot of negativity towards op.

Areolaborealis · 08/10/2024 18:01

If it makes you feel any better I once flooded the floor while standing at Sainsbury's checkout. Turns out it was a UTI with the only symptom being sudden and complete loss of bladder control.

I now shop at Asda.

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:02

grannypants22 · 08/10/2024 17:45

Some cunty comments of the highest order on this thread.
Yes insurance, bla bla bla. There is a reasonable explanation for it but to stick the boot into the op when she's had such a horrible experience is vile.
Having had urgency issues in the past I know only too well the sheer panic of needing the loo and not being able to access one and knowing that if you don't find somewhere quick you're going to be in a horrible, humiliating situation.
Some of you have clearly had a huge empathy bypass.

There is no insurance issue. Just a lot of jobsworths on this thread

bringmorewashing · 08/10/2024 18:04

How horrible for you OP, and I can't believe the nasty and condescending comments on here. Maybe it wasn't practically possible to let you use the loo for whatever reason, but hiding behind "policy" was very cold of them. What about basic human decency?

KnottedTwine · 08/10/2024 18:06

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:02

There is no insurance issue. Just a lot of jobsworths on this thread

But that is literally the meaning of "jobsworth". It's more than my job's worth. So if I let you do X, I will lose my job, and therefore my job is worth more to me than doing that thing is to you.

cryinglaughing · 08/10/2024 18:07

YABU

herecomesautumn · 08/10/2024 18:09

What a lot of fuss

I have a very dodgy bladder and have taken to wearing tena pads when I'm out

Couldn't you do this OP?

Staff toilets are for staff.

ilovesooty · 08/10/2024 18:12

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:02

There is no insurance issue. Just a lot of jobsworths on this thread

"Jobsworths" to point out that employees don't create the policies but might lose their jobs if they breach the policy?

eggandonion · 08/10/2024 18:14

Perhaps this was the first time op had been in such dire need..and didn't realise that wearing pretty incontinence pants would be a good move?

Needmorelego · 08/10/2024 18:15

@wombat15 you seem obsessed with the insurance thing.
Why?

betterangels · 08/10/2024 18:22

nappyvalley1992 · 08/10/2024 16:45

"When I worked retail, I wasn't not allowed to "bend the rules", ever. I would have lost my job if found out. Sorry, but that's not a chance I was going to take, nor is it something I would expect from a shop staff as a customer"

To be honest I would be happy losing that job on principle if they had that attitude.

Says someone unlikely to be living payday to payday.

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:24

KnottedTwine · 08/10/2024 18:06

But that is literally the meaning of "jobsworth". It's more than my job's worth. So if I let you do X, I will lose my job, and therefore my job is worth more to me than doing that thing is to you.

A jobsworth is someone who says that it is more than their job's worth in order to be uncooperative, or obstructive or unhelp. It characterises one who upholds petty rules even at the expense of effectiveness or efficiency. The Oxford dictionary defines is as "A person in authority (esp. a minor official) who insists on adhering to rules and regulations or bureaucratic procedures even at the expense of common sense.

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:25

Needmorelego · 08/10/2024 18:15

@wombat15 you seem obsessed with the insurance thing.
Why?

Because every other post incorrectly gives it as a reason.

Fluufer · 08/10/2024 18:26

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:25

Because every other post incorrectly gives it as a reason.

How do you know it's incorrect? Are you co-ops underwriter?

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:33

Fluufer · 08/10/2024 18:26

How do you know it's incorrect? Are you co-ops underwriter?

Nobody has provided any evidence that it would not be covered by insurance and it would make no sense. Why would a shop risk not being covered?

As plenty of people have pointed out shops do let the public use the toilets if they have a medical need or other specified reasons. That includes the Co-op.

NeedToChangeName · 08/10/2024 18:39

TartanPJs · 08/10/2024 12:46

This thread has just reminded me how glad I am that I don't live in the UK any more.

It's a bit of a tangent, but last night I was talking to a client who is a primary school teacher, and previously worked in London. I was asking her about the differences. She said the relationships between staff and children are just much warmer here. If a kid is upset she can give them a cuddle. And I'm very glad to live somewhere where regulations don't stop my child's teacher being able to comfort them when they need it. But of course in Britain everyone would be yelling 'safeguarding!'

Edited

Everybody wouldn't yell "safeguarding!" I have fond memories of sitting on my teacher's knee to read in primary school, or Santa's knee in a shopping centre, and I'm rather sorry we live in a world where that's frowned upon now

buffyajp · 08/10/2024 18:42

grannypants22 · 08/10/2024 17:45

Some cunty comments of the highest order on this thread.
Yes insurance, bla bla bla. There is a reasonable explanation for it but to stick the boot into the op when she's had such a horrible experience is vile.
Having had urgency issues in the past I know only too well the sheer panic of needing the loo and not being able to access one and knowing that if you don't find somewhere quick you're going to be in a horrible, humiliating situation.
Some of you have clearly had a huge empathy bypass.

The only cunty comment as you so charmingly put it is from you. God forbid anyone on here can have an opinion that you don’t agree with. I’ve had four kids and have a weak bladder myself but I wouldn’t expect a staff member to risk their job for me. That’s not acceptable. That’s why at the end of my pregnancies I wore maternity pads in case of leaks. I’m getting fed up of seeing comments having a go at posters just because they don’t automatically agree with the op, even if they are pregnant.

Needmorelego · 08/10/2024 18:47

@wombat15 I can't be bothered to read back 21 pages but I think the first mention of insurance was "it's probably because of insurance". I don't think people were stating it as fact - just giving a maybe.

since1986 · 08/10/2024 18:49

pelvicfloorisnomore · 08/10/2024 10:47

How could I plan better?

I live in a small town. I went to the loo immediately before the school run. I don’t have access to a car during the week as my husband uses it to commute to work so my only means od transport is to walk the kids to school and was just picking up some milk before returning home. There are no public loos. The staff in that coop see me several mornings a week picking up staples. I don’t normally need the loo on the school run but the baby dropped.

Get a home delivery from another supermarket. If you're shopping daily at the coop you can deffo afford that. You'd probably be able to even afford a 2nd car if you shopped somewhere else 🤣

wombat15 · 08/10/2024 18:59

Needmorelego · 08/10/2024 18:47

@wombat15 I can't be bothered to read back 21 pages but I think the first mention of insurance was "it's probably because of insurance". I don't think people were stating it as fact - just giving a maybe.

Lots of posters have stated it as fact.

Swipe left for the next trending thread