Please help settle an argument for us, I realise how trivial it sounds, but the principle is really bugging me!
DC (5) sat down after school and asked if she could watch telly. DH said yes, but must be CBeebies, not Disney. DC miffed as wants to watch Disney. So I say well why can't she watch Disney?
Genuine question - they watch all sorts of stuff on the kids profile Disney and it's never an issue. We all literally watched a Disney film together as a family on Sunday.
DH instead of explaining, gets pissed off with me for undermining his parenting and says the reason doesn't matter, I should agree with him and enforce it, not question it in front of her.
My view is, wtaf - I didn't say she could watch it, I simply asked the reason he said no. He is adamant I should not question him in front of her as it's undermining his parenting and she'll think she can do whatever she wants. I 100% disagree and do not want to raise a child that blindly follows rules without question if it's genuinely unclear why that rule is there. Doesn't mean we should not follow a rule, but understanding why helps with compliance, surely! (Obviously if it's a valid reason).
Anyway, argument ensued and DH is fuming with me and now doesn't want to speak to me. Managed to get out of him that it's just "crap" and not educational. Generally we back each other up and enforce things we have agreed on but it seems this is purely his opinion on this particular day. My opinion would be that she's had a full day at school and it's fine to watch some mindless telly to wind down, and had we talked about this beforehand I'd have disagreed with him banning it purely because he felt like it today.
So did I undermine him or is my view also valid?