Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Maternity pay has gone too far

367 replies

EasterIssland · 29/09/2024 19:28

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c781m9v4255o

apologies if there is another thread about it.
havent seen one.

im lucky enough to have a good salary that would allow me saving beforehand . Statutory maternity pay would mean around 20-30% of my salary. Is this too far? It’s one of the many reasons why we decided to only have one. I felt really vulnerable when I was on maternity leave and didn’t feel I kept having spare cash every month. I do understand what she means tho , the sooner we’re back the less we get from the government and more taxes we pay. Coming from a woman hurts even more not being recognised the sacrifices we do whilst we are on maternity leave

Kemi Badenoch speaking at a Conservative Party leadership campaign

Maternity pay has gone too far, says Kemi Badenoch

The Tory leadership candidate says the government should be reducing regulatory burdens for businesses.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c781m9v4255o

OP posts:
PlayDadiFreyr · 30/09/2024 13:33

What bothers me most about this is the innate cognitive refusal to see babies not as people.

We are all born. Even if you are tiny and don't have a vote, the UK government is responsible for you just like any other citizen.

Calling a human being a "lifestyle choice" is ridiculous.

BarbaraHoward · 30/09/2024 13:38

Porridgeislife · 30/09/2024 13:32

@BarbaraHoward

I’m not entirely sure why we’re arguing as I originally made the point that nursery doesn’t have to mean the end of the breastfeeding relationship and made it clear I went back at 7 months. You made the point that not all babies take a bottle. I said mine didn’t, and bottle refusal didn’t mean the end of breastfeeding for us.

You’ve now turned this into a going back before 6 months issue which isn’t my situation, so I'm not sure what your point is now. I’m sorry for anyone who does have to go back before six months.

Edited

Apologies, I thought you were one of those arguing that six months maternity was sufficient. I may have misunderstood.

Firsttimetrier · 30/09/2024 14:04

The best thing Labour can do at this point is increase statutory maternity pay.

It’s currently 44% of national minimum wage.. Why? It needs to be increased to be in line with minimum wage to start with as it just proves you can’t live properly off the current amount.

MakeMeATea · 30/09/2024 14:21

We only had one despite earning average UK salaries as cannot afford the cost of childcare for 2 plus the rising cost of paying a mortgage, council tax and even food shopping.
I look around me, my working sil only has one, lots of smaller families barely making replacement rate.
Meanwhile my mum had 3, her mum had 3, fil side had 7 😱ok maybe that is extreme.
Meanwhile uncontrolled immigration and those who aren't working are having loads of kids.. sahm mums (lucky).
So working couples are being penilised and aren't having that many kids anymore.. Just the wealthy and those who don't work..there's no incentive for those on a middling salary to have children.
Can't wait to see what this country will be looking like in 20 plus years.

Gogogo12345 · 30/09/2024 14:46

MakeMeATea · 30/09/2024 14:21

We only had one despite earning average UK salaries as cannot afford the cost of childcare for 2 plus the rising cost of paying a mortgage, council tax and even food shopping.
I look around me, my working sil only has one, lots of smaller families barely making replacement rate.
Meanwhile my mum had 3, her mum had 3, fil side had 7 😱ok maybe that is extreme.
Meanwhile uncontrolled immigration and those who aren't working are having loads of kids.. sahm mums (lucky).
So working couples are being penilised and aren't having that many kids anymore.. Just the wealthy and those who don't work..there's no incentive for those on a middling salary to have children.
Can't wait to see what this country will be looking like in 20 plus years.

See I had 3 but spaced them out so wasn't paying 2 lots of full time childcare in one go.

Yamantau · 30/09/2024 14:50

IVFmumoftwo · 30/09/2024 05:17

You are.

I was only asking how it helps which I presume is different than advocating

IVFmumoftwo · 30/09/2024 14:54

MakeMeATea · 30/09/2024 14:21

We only had one despite earning average UK salaries as cannot afford the cost of childcare for 2 plus the rising cost of paying a mortgage, council tax and even food shopping.
I look around me, my working sil only has one, lots of smaller families barely making replacement rate.
Meanwhile my mum had 3, her mum had 3, fil side had 7 😱ok maybe that is extreme.
Meanwhile uncontrolled immigration and those who aren't working are having loads of kids.. sahm mums (lucky).
So working couples are being penilised and aren't having that many kids anymore.. Just the wealthy and those who don't work..there's no incentive for those on a middling salary to have children.
Can't wait to see what this country will be looking like in 20 plus years.

Those not working might be having lots of kids (where?) but they are affected by benefit caps and two child limits.

Codlingmoths · 30/09/2024 14:56

I think this comment is quite upsetting bullshit. I think 9 months is a good length of time - 6 month olds are still babies and it is really hard to get affordable care at the ratios they need and really challenging to let them go. 9 month olds are starting to move more and should be eating so breastfeeding mums can feel more comfortable leaving them and they should finally be getting some sleep which you can’t guarantee at 6 months. It’s a huge difference. I went back at 10 months with both of my first 2.

rainingsnoring · 30/09/2024 15:22

rainingsnoring · 30/09/2024 12:23

Can you please link to the video clip that supports your opinion @LongtailedTitmouse.

I guess you couldn't find it then @LongtailedTitmouse. Meanwhile, on the video that is available on Badenoch's own twitter account, she says that maternity pay is excessive.
She was also 'misrepresented' on The Telegraph website this morning too, poor thing.

ilovesooty · 30/09/2024 15:33

Miriam Cates on Radio 5 this morning kindly explained that Badenoch didn't mean what she seemed to have said. Apparently we should accept with grace that people often say things they didn't mean in live interviews. So that's OK then. 🙄

Completelyjo · 30/09/2024 15:44

ilovesooty · 30/09/2024 15:33

Miriam Cates on Radio 5 this morning kindly explained that Badenoch didn't mean what she seemed to have said. Apparently we should accept with grace that people often say things they didn't mean in live interviews. So that's OK then. 🙄

I often come out with really controversial small state conservative views when asked a live question. We must have the same issue!

ilovesooty · 30/09/2024 15:54

Completelyjo · 30/09/2024 15:44

I often come out with really controversial small state conservative views when asked a live question. We must have the same issue!

🤣

PigletJohn · 30/09/2024 16:17

@MakeMeATea

You say you live in a country with uncontrolled immigration?

I don't.

Which country do you live in?

TriesNotToBeCynical · 30/09/2024 16:22

I do however live in a country whose government regularly lies to its citizens for populist reasons about allowing large numbers of immigrants for necessary economic reasons; then whips up hatred about a few thousand refugees to divert the population from the need for legal immigration. But it is pretty well, if not absolutely, controlled.

Walkaround · 30/09/2024 17:31

Her opinions are reminiscent of Monty Python… What has regulation ever done for us? 🤣

PigeonLady · 30/09/2024 17:34

Completelyjo · 30/09/2024 11:41

Agree. A number of posters have been quick to claim she is being misrepresented, still yet to see a compelling argument for that? She quite clearly suggested 9 months statutory maternity pay was too much regulation on businesses and heavily implied this, along with other statutory entitlements are the reason businesses fail. And also pushed for “more personal responsibility” and specifically mentioned a time when no statutory leave was available as though it was some sort of positive.
At a bare minimum she seems to be suggesting small business should be able to opt out of the ‘red tape’ of a minimum maternity leave and term.

Still waiting on the compelling argument as to why this isn’t at all what she meant and why hat she meant instead…

I don’t even get this argument.

I have a small business. The government pays 110% of the SMP cost so it’s not a cost.

There is an issue of cover yes. But that doesn’t cause a company to go under.

HilVicMin · 30/09/2024 17:39

100% correct. - your post that is, not the comments made by Toxic Kemikal Badenough!

Juleslovesmaths · 30/09/2024 17:49

EasterIssland · 29/09/2024 19:28

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c781m9v4255o

apologies if there is another thread about it.
havent seen one.

im lucky enough to have a good salary that would allow me saving beforehand . Statutory maternity pay would mean around 20-30% of my salary. Is this too far? It’s one of the many reasons why we decided to only have one. I felt really vulnerable when I was on maternity leave and didn’t feel I kept having spare cash every month. I do understand what she means tho , the sooner we’re back the less we get from the government and more taxes we pay. Coming from a woman hurts even more not being recognised the sacrifices we do whilst we are on maternity leave

My son and his wife live in Finland - they are entitled to 16 months of state paid maternity or paternity ( not at the same time) which is based on their usual income - so his wife had 12 month off and he’s now off for four months so she can go back to work - once their baby starts nursery it is a max of 200 euros a month for full time - they pay less as they have an older one as well - this is means tested - the country values families highly and this is paid for by taxation - my son moaned on first moving there about the higher tax rates paid but he moans no longer — our system is very poor - we need an increased birth rate or our older population will be completely screwed in 10 years time but government is too short sighted to see it.

Goldenbear · 30/09/2024 17:51

Walkaround · 30/09/2024 17:31

Her opinions are reminiscent of Monty Python… What has regulation ever done for us? 🤣

😆

schmeler · 30/09/2024 18:22

Robin223 · 30/09/2024 07:18

Did you not see where I said that he worked away? My dad was incredible. It doesn’t change the fact that he was a pilot. Pilots work away.

So he could drop days and work part time....he doesn't have to work full time in that role. He could do part time pilot and part time elsewhere....

If he didn't help his wife in crisis or wasn't there for you...not sure he was.

anon666 · 30/09/2024 18:27

She's just trying to appeal to the hard right. Of all the nonsense, this is the worst. We as a society can afford to have mum's and dad's provide care to their own children for a year after birth, while they are at their most vulnerable. Childcare is more expensive and difficult at that age anyway.

DiduAye · 30/09/2024 18:28

Badenochs opinions on many things are VILE

Grammarnut · 30/09/2024 18:28

Robin223 · 29/09/2024 19:38

Have you exclusively breastfed?

I thought why that might matter. I exclusively breastfed and my DS and DD were neither of them weaned at six months. Typical career woman's attitude to motherhood, with Conservative small-statism with knobs on as the icing.

Walkaround · 30/09/2024 18:30

Grammarnut · 30/09/2024 18:28

I thought why that might matter. I exclusively breastfed and my DS and DD were neither of them weaned at six months. Typical career woman's attitude to motherhood, with Conservative small-statism with knobs on as the icing.

Emphasis on the knobs. 🤣 Plenty of them in the Tory party.

Grammarnut · 30/09/2024 18:34

Codlingmoths · 30/09/2024 14:56

I think this comment is quite upsetting bullshit. I think 9 months is a good length of time - 6 month olds are still babies and it is really hard to get affordable care at the ratios they need and really challenging to let them go. 9 month olds are starting to move more and should be eating so breastfeeding mums can feel more comfortable leaving them and they should finally be getting some sleep which you can’t guarantee at 6 months. It’s a huge difference. I went back at 10 months with both of my first 2.

Other European countries have much better maternity (and paternity) leave. Many have more support to allow women to stay at home with small children as well. Badenoch is out of order - small-statism and less regulation means fewer workers' rights, less health and safety and no statutory safeguards for minimum wages. Badenoch isn't going to experience any of the downsides of deregulation but the rest of us will. She was stupid to reveal her views, but now we know!

Swipe left for the next trending thread