To clarify.
The surgery receptionist gave me blood results over the phone, mentioning the 3 levels, LH, FSH, and testosterone. I requested a follow up appointment to discuss these in detail.
We then had a follow up appointment with the GP, who said her markers for PCOS were in range, the LH and FSH. Testosterone was not mentioned to us as a marker, or relevant at all in fact, to a possible PCOS diagnosis. The only bloods mentioned at that appointment were the LH and the FSH. I asked what the next steps would be, this is when she mentioned weight initially, which by then was considered normal, and she said that we could maybe could refer for ultrasound. I said ok do that, if it going to help figure what is happening. So she did, 6 months ago. We didnt have any GP appointments in the mean time as we were waiting for the ultrasound.
6 months later she has had the ultrasound which shows normal ovaries. I called for the results yesterday morning. The GP has said "no further investigations, just lose weight, periods will kick in and become regular"
At no point, in the 6 months, has the GP mentioned the testosterone being a marker, or indicator, or part of the criteria for diagnosing PCOS. So yes, yesterday when i posted i initially felt fobbed off and didnt know how to advocate for my daughter. This thread, the replies, and advice, and links shared, informed me that that blood test was relevant, and infact, a diagnostic result.
The GP never said weight loss can correct testosterone. The GP never spoke about this result. This is why i called the practice and spoke the to the manager, as i feel the GP misled me regarding my childs health, as when she spoke about PCOS investigation's, she only mentioned the 2 blood tests and ultrasound. She bypassed, completely, a result that 6 months ago, would have led to a PCOS diagnosis, as, 6 months ago, she had the high testosterone, and no periods, which i now understand is enough to diagnose the condition.
So no. Im no longer "taking her advice". As the information she has given me ive now found out was lacking very relevant information. And she very clearly does not know more than others, since others on this thread have linked to NICE guidelines, which state very clearly, her advice and response was wrong.