Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Concerned that Labour govt might fleece me in upcoming budget?

496 replies

RightOh9oo · 21/09/2024 18:12

Aibu to be concerned that Labour government might fleece myself/family in the next budget?

If they remove the right to UK pension for all, by making it means tested....I think I'll stop working this year. I'm early 50s, does anyone else feel like this?

I'm going without so much to save in my private pension, so no holidays to speak of.

Does anyone know what is in store in the upcoming budget?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Phen0menon · 21/09/2024 21:32

Any means testing of state pension will phase out very slowly.

Your current batch of 40 year olds have often already got 20 years of contributions. Very difficult to say "oh you've paid in but you won't get anything at all."

I do think its more likely the date you get it will be delayed.

PandoraSox · 21/09/2024 21:33

EasternStandard · 21/09/2024 21:28

You are not in the working people definition so presumably in the 'pain' part of the recent press conference. What this means I guess you'll find out when Reeves clarifies what was sold in as painful some while back

From your post I take it you think you'll not be taxed more and the higher tax burden is for other people to pay?

No. As I said, if I have to pay more tax on my savings, fine. If I have to pay more income tax, fine. If my estate is taxed more when I snuff it, also fine.

Eta: when I started working back in the stone age, basic rate income tax was 33%. So to me a couple of % on the current rate of 20% doesn't seem outrageous.

Phen0menon · 21/09/2024 21:35

I suspect the areas which will be targeted:

Iht - agricultural property relief. This is so abused its laughable. High earning city folk with random flocks of sheep all over the bloody place.
Also business property relief.

CGT - align with income tax.

Tax relief on pension contributions.

StarDolphins · 21/09/2024 21:36

ilovesooty · 21/09/2024 18:41

And Your Money doesn't Go into Your Own personal Pot.

You Fund the Pensions of those who went before You.

That’s besides the point really. We were led to believe that we’d be looked after from ‘cradle to grave’ & that if we had full stamp, we’d get our SP. Thats what everyone was told & everyone expects.

Phen0menon · 21/09/2024 21:36

Pandora, i'll probably be taxed more across the piece but Im ok with it, i really like public services and the welfare state

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:37

Hoardasauruskaren · 21/09/2024 21:26

The Old Age Pension Act was passed in 1908 & first paid 1 Jan 1909! The 1960s was 50 years later!

And your point is?

RightOh9oo · 21/09/2024 21:38

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 20:20

Because some stupid people would decide not to make adequate private provision for themselves.

I think you mean the remaining suckers might not bother, and join the rest of you.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:40

Phen0menon · 21/09/2024 21:35

I suspect the areas which will be targeted:

Iht - agricultural property relief. This is so abused its laughable. High earning city folk with random flocks of sheep all over the bloody place.
Also business property relief.

CGT - align with income tax.

Tax relief on pension contributions.

That’s my hunch too. Rumour has it tax relief on pension contributions will equalised at 30% which is good news for basic rate taxpayers.

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:41

RightOh9oo · 21/09/2024 21:38

I think you mean the remaining suckers might not bother, and join the rest of you.

Don’t be so fucking rude. I’d wager I’ve paid more into my pension than you have.

Zonder · 21/09/2024 21:41

Hey I've got a good idea. Why don't we wait and see instead of starting so many threads to talk about the same old thing?

Or alternatively we could watch lots of threads about imaginary things that might come up in the budget 😴

EasternStandard · 21/09/2024 21:42

PandoraSox · 21/09/2024 21:33

No. As I said, if I have to pay more tax on my savings, fine. If I have to pay more income tax, fine. If my estate is taxed more when I snuff it, also fine.

Eta: when I started working back in the stone age, basic rate income tax was 33%. So to me a couple of % on the current rate of 20% doesn't seem outrageous.

Edited

You are a willing higher tax burden participant. Reading this thread and various posts some seem keen to pay more and receive less, eg the pension

I do wonder how long that grace will last if taxes keep going up and spending cuts too. Some will remain gung ho about that due to the party doing it but I think the rest of the public won't be so forgiving.

Putting · 21/09/2024 21:42

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:40

That’s my hunch too. Rumour has it tax relief on pension contributions will equalised at 30% which is good news for basic rate taxpayers.

As long as that applies to contributions into public sector schemes as well as private sector.

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:42

Putting · 21/09/2024 21:42

As long as that applies to contributions into public sector schemes as well as private sector.

Why wouldn’t it?

PandoraSox · 21/09/2024 21:43

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:41

Don’t be so fucking rude. I’d wager I’ve paid more into my pension than you have.

I have a feeling about this poster. Their rudeness is very familiar...

RhubarbAndCustardSweets · 21/09/2024 21:44

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 18:58

An average household over their lifetime has paid 140,745 in national insurance contributions (in real terms).

Life expectancy at 65 is around 20 years for men and 22 for women. So let’s say 19 and 21 from retirement age. A couple gets 23,004 a year, times 20 years that is around £460k. Significantly more than what the average household has paid in to the system.

The “paid in all my life” argument doesn’t make sense at all when you are asking younger people with higher planned retirement ages and a higher tax burden than you had to pay more tax in order for you to get more pension.

Our pension system only works when the generation underneath is significantly larger than the one above and as fertility has declined this is no longer the case. When the retirement age was introduced it was 65, the life expectancy at the time was also 65! This isn’t a sustainable system unless we significantly increase fertility, reduce the generosity of the pension or increase the age of retirement.

I wish people were forced to read this over and over and over until they completely understood the issues we are facing.

I'm so fed up of hearing "but I've paid my stamp" nonsense. No. You. Have. Not.

Very few people put more in than they take out.

Putting · 21/09/2024 21:44

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:42

Why wouldn’t it?

Because it would mean higher rate taxpayers in the public sector have to pay more tax if they want to be in the pension scheme

XenoBitch · 21/09/2024 21:44

Zonder · 21/09/2024 21:41

Hey I've got a good idea. Why don't we wait and see instead of starting so many threads to talk about the same old thing?

Or alternatively we could watch lots of threads about imaginary things that might come up in the budget 😴

This.

I have seen posters on MN swear blind that the single person CT discount is going... and it is scaring a lot of people.

Just wait and see. Worrying about it just steals joy from your life.

RightOh9oo · 21/09/2024 21:44

Superworm24 · 21/09/2024 20:27

Those claiming they won't save are the same idiots who moan about pension credits or say they will quit work and claim benefits. Go on then. Live on pittance and you'll really be showing us all/teaching the silly government a lesson.

But if they means test the state pension you'd have to have saved over 300k in a private pension to be breaking even with the state pension.

Who can say, truthfully, that they've got that amount, through hard work and saving, and would therefore say, well ok I'll say no to my pension to enable all the others who haven't saved to have one for free?

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:45

Putting · 21/09/2024 21:44

Because it would mean higher rate taxpayers in the public sector have to pay more tax if they want to be in the pension scheme

Why would higher rate taxpayers in the public sector get preferential treatment? All higher rate taxpayers would pay more.

EasternStandard · 21/09/2024 21:47

RhubarbAndCustardSweets · 21/09/2024 21:44

I wish people were forced to read this over and over and over until they completely understood the issues we are facing.

I'm so fed up of hearing "but I've paid my stamp" nonsense. No. You. Have. Not.

Very few people put more in than they take out.

What are you suggesting wrt the pension?

DrapeyDreamer · 21/09/2024 21:47

XenoBitch · 21/09/2024 21:44

This.

I have seen posters on MN swear blind that the single person CT discount is going... and it is scaring a lot of people.

Just wait and see. Worrying about it just steals joy from your life.

Exactly - it's all just hypotheticals and scaremongering for now (although Starmer's Rose Garden doom and gloom speech perhaps wasn't the best idea as it did send the rumour mills into overdrive).

Putting · 21/09/2024 21:48

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 21:45

Why would higher rate taxpayers in the public sector get preferential treatment? All higher rate taxpayers would pay more.

I don’t think they should. But Labour seem to be caving in to the demands of a lot of public sector higher rate taxpayers at the moment…

PandoraSox · 21/09/2024 21:48

EasternStandard · 21/09/2024 21:42

You are a willing higher tax burden participant. Reading this thread and various posts some seem keen to pay more and receive less, eg the pension

I do wonder how long that grace will last if taxes keep going up and spending cuts too. Some will remain gung ho about that due to the party doing it but I think the rest of the public won't be so forgiving.

Well, let's see where we are at the end of this administration. Two and a half months in is too soon to predict anything.

StarDolphins · 21/09/2024 21:49

EasternStandard · 21/09/2024 21:03

You're in scope for higher taxes then under Starmer's definition, it's good you are keen as many on mn are.

I’m not keen. I don’t want to be penalised for doing without & saving. I’m not happy or keen to pay tax on my savings at all.

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 21:52

DrapeyDreamer · 21/09/2024 21:26

As long as I can get a refund on the stamp duty I've just paid....

If I was designing the policy, I would have recent stamp duty payments give a partial credit towards the new property tax. Not a total credit because you would also not be paying council tax anymore.