Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Concerned that Labour govt might fleece me in upcoming budget?

496 replies

RightOh9oo · 21/09/2024 18:12

Aibu to be concerned that Labour government might fleece myself/family in the next budget?

If they remove the right to UK pension for all, by making it means tested....I think I'll stop working this year. I'm early 50s, does anyone else feel like this?

I'm going without so much to save in my private pension, so no holidays to speak of.

Does anyone know what is in store in the upcoming budget?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 22:46

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:45

You have heard of salary sacrifice pension contributions haven’t you?

They’re something entirely different.

Putting · 21/09/2024 22:46

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 22:43

Imagine the tax on that, that the employee will need to cough up…

Employers’ contributions aren’t taxable ….

Yet…

But even so, the mandatory employee contribution would be £5586pa on that salary, so an extra £50 - £100ish to pay per month if tax relief was cut.

wastingtimeonhere · 21/09/2024 22:46

I thought life expectancy was now retreating. Obesity and poor health with reduce it back to pre war levels.
If they push up pension age but life expectancy goes back down it will meet where it originally was surely?

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:46

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 22:46

They’re something entirely different.

So most people could just salsac and avoid any restriction?

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:47

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 22:45

Civil service pensions are not defined contribution. It’s defined benefit. The 28% or so is just the value that hmrc use for tax purposes.

You get: years worked * average salary over career / 43.

So working 43 years with an average salary of 40k would get you 40k a year pension. V v v generous by private sector standards but it is apples and oranges in terms of comparing the two.

What’s your point on the taxation of this?

Blinkingbonkers · 21/09/2024 22:48

We stopped paying voluntary contributions for me a while a good while ago - I absolutely believe state pension should be for all….but neither I nor dh have faith it’ll be there in 20 years… what would be really great to know would be the opt out incentive if you have private health (through occupation), pay school fees (from your salary) and afford your own pension…. WTF do we bother?! And darling Kier & cronies will never have to bother as they get civil servant pensions & the joy of post office speaking engagement fees🙄

poetryandwine · 21/09/2024 22:49

OP,

Where did your fear that Labour will do this come from? If you could give us a source, which you haven’t done yet, we could engage with you. I would disagree, but I would engage and I would probably sympathise.

In the absence of a source, you must know that what PP are saying is true: if Labour tried to do this it would be decades before they saw power again.

Meanwhile, I am all too aware that hostile governments are attempting to destabilise the major Western democracies, specifically Ukraine’s strongest allies. And here you are, posting an unfounded rumour in a new user name. If you cannot give us a reasonable source for your concerns I think YABVVVU

sarahzbaker · 21/09/2024 22:50

I would rather contribute than not. I don't care. The Tories have left us in the weeds

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 22:53

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:47

What’s your point on the taxation of this?

I didn’t make the point but… You have to be extremely careful on the taxation of defined benefit pensions as NHS doctors will simply walk out if they are taxed too harshly.

The whole reason the lifetime allowance was abolished and the annual limit was increased to 60k was because doctors were retiring early or refusing to work additional shifts because the pension tax was crippling them financially.

If there was a flat 30% and doctors had to pay the difference in tax bill out of their salary then it would be game over for the NHS.

Putting · 21/09/2024 22:53

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:46

So most people could just salsac and avoid any restriction?

Yep, unless there’s something put in place to stop that.

Would be extremely tricky legislation to write, though.

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:54

Any serving government minister should be required to pay retrospectively in tax, for any tax change they bring in. So Starmer should be required to pay the VAT on the school fees and any bursaries he received, obviously increased for inflation, plus interest (at student loans obscene rates) and late payment interest and penalties applied.

Ang should pay CGT on her old council house at the new rates they are threatening to bring in, plus pay back the discount she got on purchase of it (plus RPI etc) and remove any PPR relief.

Krampers · 21/09/2024 22:55

Hoardasauruskaren · 21/09/2024 22:38

Wtf? As an NHS health professional doing night shifts in A&E dealing with all sorts I am offended by your comment! I am being paid a salary for doing my often difficult job! Do you think we should all be working for free ?

Probably does. I am also offended given my monthly tax bill is well over 2k!

dottiehens · 21/09/2024 22:55

People are going to make this happen asking for this so much. It should not happened but nothing would surprised me anymore. Some people because of the high cost of living do not have private pension. This is one of the worse civilised countries to live where you work like a dog for nothing but survival. It is disgusting.

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 22:56

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:54

Any serving government minister should be required to pay retrospectively in tax, for any tax change they bring in. So Starmer should be required to pay the VAT on the school fees and any bursaries he received, obviously increased for inflation, plus interest (at student loans obscene rates) and late payment interest and penalties applied.

Ang should pay CGT on her old council house at the new rates they are threatening to bring in, plus pay back the discount she got on purchase of it (plus RPI etc) and remove any PPR relief.

We don’t have retrospective taxation. That’s an incredibly vindictive idea.

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:58

dottiehens · 21/09/2024 22:55

People are going to make this happen asking for this so much. It should not happened but nothing would surprised me anymore. Some people because of the high cost of living do not have private pension. This is one of the worse civilised countries to live where you work like a dog for nothing but survival. It is disgusting.

Totally agree. I hate this country and government. I thought the last shower were a disgrace but the amount of fear and uncertainty this shower of sxxx have subjected us to is unforgivable.

Blinkingbonkers · 21/09/2024 22:58

MarvellousMable · 21/09/2024 22:54

Any serving government minister should be required to pay retrospectively in tax, for any tax change they bring in. So Starmer should be required to pay the VAT on the school fees and any bursaries he received, obviously increased for inflation, plus interest (at student loans obscene rates) and late payment interest and penalties applied.

Ang should pay CGT on her old council house at the new rates they are threatening to bring in, plus pay back the discount she got on purchase of it (plus RPI etc) and remove any PPR relief.

Vindictive is what a previous poster said…. But I’d say reap what you’ve sown?!!! I think they have it right… you’ve significantly benefited from it?… you pay the price you expect others to🤷🏼‍♀️

New2thisshizzle · 21/09/2024 22:59

I think they will just keep moving the age out

FlowertFlowers · 21/09/2024 23:00

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 18:58

An average household over their lifetime has paid 140,745 in national insurance contributions (in real terms).

Life expectancy at 65 is around 20 years for men and 22 for women. So let’s say 19 and 21 from retirement age. A couple gets 23,004 a year, times 20 years that is around £460k. Significantly more than what the average household has paid in to the system.

The “paid in all my life” argument doesn’t make sense at all when you are asking younger people with higher planned retirement ages and a higher tax burden than you had to pay more tax in order for you to get more pension.

Our pension system only works when the generation underneath is significantly larger than the one above and as fertility has declined this is no longer the case. When the retirement age was introduced it was 65, the life expectancy at the time was also 65! This isn’t a sustainable system unless we significantly increase fertility, reduce the generosity of the pension or increase the age of retirement.

But there are people that pay pay in and never get their pension. Those that die before pension age and those that only work for a few years in the uk. Also if people are working for longer then 68/70 dementia needs to be seriously looked at because it’s pretty much an epidemic from what Îm seeing around me.

Krampers · 21/09/2024 23:01

Rhayader · 21/09/2024 22:53

I didn’t make the point but… You have to be extremely careful on the taxation of defined benefit pensions as NHS doctors will simply walk out if they are taxed too harshly.

The whole reason the lifetime allowance was abolished and the annual limit was increased to 60k was because doctors were retiring early or refusing to work additional shifts because the pension tax was crippling them financially.

If there was a flat 30% and doctors had to pay the difference in tax bill out of their salary then it would be game over for the NHS.

Yes I and many others would probably just revert to working independently as contractors in the private sector or for ISTCs instead as there would be no point staying in the NHS.

crockofshite · 21/09/2024 23:01

Catza · 21/09/2024 18:23

Where did you hear this information? It sounds totally implausible that state pension will be means tested. And even if it is, surely your private pension is worth a lot more so I don't see how stoping work is beneficial in any way.

Edited

Australia means tests pensions. It could happen here too as the UK seems to be heading towards bankruptcy thanks to previous Tory and labour administrations not having a fucking clue how to run an economy.

New2thisshizzle · 21/09/2024 23:02

I'd favour a massive simplification of all taxes, a reduction in cliff edges that disincentivise earning above a certain level. I'd get rid of NI, enforce a certain level of pension payments for all earners and have flatter taxes. But that would entail a conversation that we don't seem willing to have- that you can't have public services at the levels people expect on current tax levels.

This but people don’t want to hear it.

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2024 23:02

Blinkingbonkers · 21/09/2024 22:58

Vindictive is what a previous poster said…. But I’d say reap what you’ve sown?!!! I think they have it right… you’ve significantly benefited from it?… you pay the price you expect others to🤷🏼‍♀️

What about if you didn’t benefit? I paid 33% basic rate tax when I started work, can I have a rebate in your bonkers world?

New2thisshizzle · 21/09/2024 23:03

@Rhayader has a point, the shifting demographics are making it unsustainable

TheHateIsNotGood · 21/09/2024 23:03

CS Pensions are a 'plague' on working people and one of the least deserved benefits paid for by the tax payer, The whole pay, T&Cs and structure of the CS needs reform before any reforms to the NHS.

At a guesstimate I suggest that for the cost of every overpaid CS 'worker' there's at least 3 underpaid NHS workers producing more.

But which worker is currently entitled to better in-work benefits - it doesn't eally matter to the low-paid private sector worker as they only get the legal minimum of anything - yet still pay the same taxes as anyone else.

Towerofsong · 21/09/2024 23:04

coldcallerbaiter · 21/09/2024 18:26

Look at the Australia model where this has already happened.

The Australian model is different, they don't specifically pay into a pension like we do with NI. It's a means tested benefit over there.