Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What great books are actually worth reading?

151 replies

Viou · 05/09/2024 09:53

Just that, so many “great” books are dull and esoteric.

But which did you actually enjoy?

I personally loved Love In The Time of Cholera and Anna Karenina

You?

I want to read more

OP posts:
KreedKafer · 05/09/2024 11:24

anythinginapinch · 05/09/2024 10:04

Great novels are not "esoteric. They are about subtle, difficult, complex and multilayered philosophical or sociological or psychological matters, that speak to millions over time. They absolutely were never for a small group of aficionados. That they have become so is largely because we have other forms of entertainment, have lost the skill of reading well, and our society now tries to avoid looking at those difficult issues, such as inequality (Dickens), what it is to be human (Russian novelists), the emergence of industrial power (Mrs Gaskell), the decline of traditional rural society (Hardy).
That's why they are "great".

What they are not, is a "rollicking good read", or "easy reading". Look elsewhere for that.

I have a degree in English literature and I firmly believe that it’s perfectly possible for a novel to cover all those things and be ‘a good read’.

In fact, I would argue (and did argue in academic essays) that if it can’t manage to do both, it isn’t a ‘great novel’.

our society now tries to avoid looking at those difficult issues, such as inequality (Dickens), what it is to be human (Russian novelists), the emergence of industrial power (Mrs Gaskell), the decline of traditional rural society (Hardy)

Modern literature really does not avoid difficult issues, at all. Thousands of contemporary writers are confronting those issues, and many more, in very accessible and readable literary fiction, and genre fiction too.

In answer to your question, OP, I think it’s always going to be a matter of personal taste. I think Bleak House is a cracking good read, but I’m sure plenty of people, perfectly reasonably, find it turgid and dull. And Jane Austen is probably one the most popular ‘classic’ novelists that people still read for pleasure, but I find her pretty tedious.

I’m not the biggest fan of 18th/19th century novelists in general, but I would say my favourite classics of that period are:

Dracula
Frankenstein
Wuthering Heights
Jane Eyre
The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
Bleak House
A Tale Of Two Cities
Madame Bovary
The Turn Of The Screw
North And South

Among my favourite modern classics are:

All Orwell’s novels
All Camus’s novels
The Bell Jar
The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists
Brideshead Revisited
The Great Gatsby
The Grapes of Wrath
The Sun Also Rises
To Kill A Mockingbird

KreedKafer · 05/09/2024 11:26

Mercurial123 · 05/09/2024 11:15

I hated Middlemarch even though it's considered one of the best novels ever written. Great Expectations would be my favourite. Also, the Cairo Trilogy.

Middlemarch is a fine example of a novel that should have been half its length.

Notgoodatpoetrybutgreatatlit · 05/09/2024 11:26

Maybe we should have a list of classics we hate!
Not all books are for everyone that's for sure. Jekyll and Hyde for example, Mrs Stevenson made him throw it on the fire, she said it was rubbish and she was right. Unfortunately he rewrote it.
They made us read Hard Times for A level, I think to punish us. Our English teacher said its only positive attribute she could think of was that it was much shorter than Bleak House and Little Dorit. To be fair to Dickens, Christmas Carol has inspired some awesome versions like the Muppet one and Catherine Tate's one. And he was great in Dr Who.

KreedKafer · 05/09/2024 11:29

Maybe we should have a list of classics we hate!

@Notgoodatpoetrybutgreatatlit Robinson Crusoe. SO TEDIOUS.

redalex261 · 05/09/2024 11:42

Rebecca and My Cousin Rachel by Daphne du Maurier. Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas. Any Jane Austen. Lord of the Rings - Tolkien. Dracula, Bram Stoker. Madame Bovary (can’t remember the author). Going to check other recommendations for inspiration when I am not supposed to be working.

Fifiesta · 05/09/2024 11:45

beguilingeyes · 05/09/2024 10:57

John Steinbeck is fantastic.
Rebecca, or Daphne du Maurier generally.
I love John Wyndham. Midwich Cuckoos, The Day Of The Triffids.

Yes, I totally agree with including the author John Wyndham.
However I would include his book ‘The Chrysalids’.
Often it is the books you read in adolescence, (and through to mid teens) that present you with new concepts and lead you away from previously accepted and unquestioned themes.
I went to a religious base school, and it gave voice to previously unexpressed disquiet about how harmful controlling and unchallenged religious dogma can be.

anythinginapinch · 05/09/2024 12:25

@KreedKafer
Ooh you have an English degree and wrote "academic essays" on the subject. I must stand corrected.
anythinginapinch PhD Eng Lit.

Dolliesdisasterousdayout · 05/09/2024 12:32

Lincslady53 · 05/09/2024 10:37

George Orwells novels are good, particularly 1984 and Animal Farm, but I really enjoyed Down and Out in London and Paris, describing his early life working in Parisienne restaurant kitchens, then coming back to live with the poorest in society in London.
I also enjoy Thomas Hardy books. Tess if the D'Urbervilles, Far from the Madding Crowd and Jude the Obscure all set in one of my favourite parts of the UK.

I love down and out in London and Paris.

Also whoever said that Pride and Prejudice was their comfort blanket, I reread it to my MIL when she was on palliative care. I don’t know why but it felt like the natural thing to do in the small hours sat holding her hand. So it has a special place in my heart.

I also love Little Women and Peter Pan.

MrsSkylerWhite · 05/09/2024 12:35

Jane Eyre

Almostwelsh · 05/09/2024 12:37

A Suitable Boy by Virkram Seth
I Capture the Castle by Dodie Smith
In the Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco

betterangels · 05/09/2024 12:39

fghbvh · 05/09/2024 11:22

God I love the unbearable lightness of being. It's beautiful and heartbreaking.

It is! And I'm just now seeing the autocorrect.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/09/2024 12:40

Ditto to many of those already mentioned, but I’d add Three Men In A Boat - a truly hilarious classic.

@KimberleyClark , ditto to the Trollope novels, esp. the Barchester and Palliser series, and The Way We Live Now.

Catsmere · 05/09/2024 12:41

KreedKafer · 05/09/2024 11:29

Maybe we should have a list of classics we hate!

@Notgoodatpoetrybutgreatatlit Robinson Crusoe. SO TEDIOUS.

The Three Musketeers. Turgid, tedious drivel. The real history of the time and the real people Dumas smears are far more interesting and engaging!

My favourite classic novel is Barchester Towers, though I’ll never love it as much as the series. Nigel Hawthorne, Alan Rickman, Getaldine McEwan - love it to bits.

Overbearingndn · 05/09/2024 12:44

Norwegian Wood by Murakami
Kitchen by Banana Yoshimoto
Tender is the Night by Fitzgerald
Wolf Hall by Mantel
Beloved by Morrison
The Colour Purple by Walker
To Kill a Mockingbird by Lee
Lolita by Nabokov
Heart of Darkness by Conrad
The Bell Jar by Plath
Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky
Middlemarch by Eliot
A Passage to India by Forster
Jane Eyre
Midnight's Children by Rushdie
The Trial by Kafka

Swingsandslides · 05/09/2024 12:46

What’s needed is a ‘rotten tomatoes’ for books. A critics score and a readers score.

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 05/09/2024 12:56

Just love Vanity Fair by William Thackeray

KTheGrey · 05/09/2024 13:09

GlassRat · 05/09/2024 10:44

I really didn't enjoy 1984. Thought the women were one dimensional and just didn't feel close to any of the characters. Brave New World, otoh, I thought was interested.
Love Frankenstein and anything by Thomas Hardy. Dracula is also great.

Have you read Julia by Sandra Newman? Reimagines it all from her point of view and somehow it’s much softer. An interesting counterpoint, I thought. She is so much better adapted than Winston Smith, and the world seems more possible to survive than in 1984.

KimberleyClark · 05/09/2024 13:15

The Raj Quartet - Paul Scott.

halava · 05/09/2024 13:18

Tess of the D'Urbervilles
Wuthering Heights
The Woman in White
Madame Bovary

Crazycatlady79 · 05/09/2024 20:47

Viou · 05/09/2024 11:01

I think you’re a bit rude for you to assert that I don’t understand the definition of esoteric.

I personally did find Moby Dick, Infinite Jest, The Brothers Karamazov (I could go on) really inaccessible for multiple reasons. Or just dull.

Thinking something is not an assertion; I stand by my original comment.

Valeriekat · 05/09/2024 22:39

Wwyd2025 · 05/09/2024 09:54

Lessons in chemistry is one of my all time Favourites.

Not yet considered to be in the pantheon.

QuiteAnEpicFailure · 05/09/2024 22:46

MurdoMunro · 05/09/2024 10:04

Top thread, making notes. I’ll add -

The Poisonwood Bible Barbara Kingsolver (I know it doesn’t always get listed on the more traditional great literature lists).

In Cold Blood, Truman Capote

Yes the poisonwood bible is a great book and also Barbara Kingsolvers more recent Demon Cooperhead

Createausername1970 · 05/09/2024 23:08

Jane Austen (my favourite character is Mrs Bennett from P&P)

I have read a few by Thackery and enjoyed them.

Fielding - goes on a bit but the stories are good and funny.

Hardy - Jude The Obscure is my favourite.

Dickens - he is very good at characterisations. I feel like I know lots of his characters in real life.

James Michener. Very well researched books. They follow the history of an area through the generations. Not everyone's cup of tea, but I enjoyed them.

Ruthietuthie · 05/09/2024 23:11

Another one who loves Tess of the D'urbervilles and Vanity Fair.

Theoldbird · 05/09/2024 23:23

anythinginapinch · 05/09/2024 10:04

Great novels are not "esoteric. They are about subtle, difficult, complex and multilayered philosophical or sociological or psychological matters, that speak to millions over time. They absolutely were never for a small group of aficionados. That they have become so is largely because we have other forms of entertainment, have lost the skill of reading well, and our society now tries to avoid looking at those difficult issues, such as inequality (Dickens), what it is to be human (Russian novelists), the emergence of industrial power (Mrs Gaskell), the decline of traditional rural society (Hardy).
That's why they are "great".

What they are not, is a "rollicking good read", or "easy reading". Look elsewhere for that.

A brilliant and much needed reminder, thanks for this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread