Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what you'll be doing to avoid the Labour tax hikes

1000 replies

OptimismvsRealism · 27/08/2024 11:20

Pension contributions
Gift aid
Selling my shares now while CGT is relatively low

What really worries me is that all the professionals we actually need to want to be here will just fuck off elsewhere, though.

It's not like we're knee deep in hospital doctors.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:03

Usercyzabc · 29/08/2024 09:51

Assume you’re not in the SE

No and people in the SE are always very surprised to find out that there are indeed other parts of the country that exist and it’s not the centre of the universe. Where I am £67,000 is a lot of money.

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:06

GrannyRose15 · 29/08/2024 09:40

Socialists don’t want you to have any money. They believe anything you own is theirs for the taking. It is a fundamental principle that stifles growth and limits ambition but it doesn’t matter to them because they don’t care about ordinary people. They only care about their ideals that have been proved time and time again not to improve anything.

Hopefully Labour has a plan to get universal credit socialists off the sofa and paying their share of services/taxes. Penalising those who work hard (to cover the costs of those choosing not to) will surely only serve to decentivise their endeavour, or find an environment where it is rewarded.

BIossomtoes · 29/08/2024 10:06

GasPanic · 29/08/2024 10:01

This really.

House prices are far to high and people cannot bring up families.

High house prices are proving ruinous to this country and they need to be fixed one way or another.

However no government has the bottle to actually do it, and I don't see anything Labour is proposing improving the situation.

Houses are still becoming more unaffordable due to tax rises and the cost of living and mortgage rates. If not the actual sticker price.

In a capitalist, market driven economy exactly how is any government of any political colour supposed to “fix” the housing market? Clearly houses aren’t “unaffordable” because the market would collapse if they were. It will be interesting to see what happens over the next ten to 15 years as boomers die and relatively large numbers of houses hit the market.

AnnieSnap · 29/08/2024 10:09

GrannyRose15 · 29/08/2024 00:07

Good luck with that. I don’t want to pay more tax because I don’t think it will make any difference to the level of service we get. Gladly eat my hat if I’m wrong.

Do you need ketchup with that? I worked in the NHS from Thatchers time through to Cameron’s. The only time it’s been properly funded was under a Labour Government. Within months of them being elected, it was like the sun coming out!

Putting · 29/08/2024 10:09

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:03

No and people in the SE are always very surprised to find out that there are indeed other parts of the country that exist and it’s not the centre of the universe. Where I am £67,000 is a lot of money.

We know areas outside the SE exist. But jobs need doing as much in the SE as anywhere else; jobs should pay enough to live on in the area the job is located.

Julen7 · 29/08/2024 10:10

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:06

Hopefully Labour has a plan to get universal credit socialists off the sofa and paying their share of services/taxes. Penalising those who work hard (to cover the costs of those choosing not to) will surely only serve to decentivise their endeavour, or find an environment where it is rewarded.

This

iwishihadknownmore · 29/08/2024 10:15

Rhayader · 29/08/2024 09:59

Socialist or not, I think this is generally the attitude difference. The discussion around tax relief on pension contributions shows it quite well.

Labour are thinking about it as “how much money the government is giving higher earners” when they get the tax relief of 40 or 45%. Whereas someone economically right wing would think of the money as being that persons to start with and it’s how much money the government will take off them.

Do our salaries belong to the government and it’s about how much we are allowed to keep or do they belong to us and it’s about how much the government need to take?

I disagree on this.

The discussion has moved to pensions relief (or CGT IHT etc) simply because Labour, in order to get elected, backed Hunts NI tax cuts, they then doubled down on this and said they'd be no tax VAT or NI increases.

This has stifled their room to rise money to pay for the PR body wage rises and the NI cuts.

Pity is, Labour would still have won, even if they'd opposed these, the country were tired of the Tories.

TBH i don't really know what Labour (or the Tories) believe in anymore e.g Starmer was once the most pro EU politician going, now listening to him, you'd think he'd once been in UKIP.

Rhayader · 29/08/2024 10:15

GasPanic · 29/08/2024 10:01

This really.

House prices are far to high and people cannot bring up families.

High house prices are proving ruinous to this country and they need to be fixed one way or another.

However no government has the bottle to actually do it, and I don't see anything Labour is proposing improving the situation.

Houses are still becoming more unaffordable due to tax rises and the cost of living and mortgage rates. If not the actual sticker price.

There has been a lot of talk of moving away from council tax to a proportional property tax. If they did this it would keep house prices in check to some degree in the south east and London.

I think the bands I heard were around 0.5% for most properties or 0.88% for 1m+ homes.

So someone in a 4 bed semi in a nice bit of Zone 3 would pay ~£13,200 a year instead of ~£3k council tax.

But someone in Wolverhampton in an average C band property would go from paying ~£2k to ~£1,250.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:16

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:06

Hopefully Labour has a plan to get universal credit socialists off the sofa and paying their share of services/taxes. Penalising those who work hard (to cover the costs of those choosing not to) will surely only serve to decentivise their endeavour, or find an environment where it is rewarded.

40% of people who claim UC are in work.

37% of people who claim UC are unfit to work due to disability, caring responsibilities etc.

The numbers of people that you think are claiming UC to sit on their arse is actually very small

AnnieSnap · 29/08/2024 10:17

80smonster · 29/08/2024 09:35

The overarching factor is that highly skilled, paid and taxed workers - who have trained in UK universities - will emigrate to other locations where they see a better life for their families. They will pay tax and buy assets in these countries thus meaning an individual trained in this country takes the benefit of that with them, along with any contribution they would make to the UK. It will be the averagely paid (not very skilled) middle class who are stuck in the UK. That is what is known as brain drain, even if they trickle out of the country, it’s an own goal for a dense population, who has too few net contributors and too many families who do not pay enough tax to cover the cost of services they use.

I realise that certain jobs require living in London, but many don’t. You do realise that property prices are nowhere near as high ‘up North’ and we don’t walk around with Whipets and flat caps 🙄

Goldenphoenix · 29/08/2024 10:19

Our country is currently not functioning properly due to years of cuts. I am happy to pay a bit more to ensure we have functioning medical services, a state education system and police force etc. These things cannot be fixed with no money to pay for them so paying a bit more is just what we have to do.

iwishihadknownmore · 29/08/2024 10:31

Goldenphoenix · 29/08/2024 10:19

Our country is currently not functioning properly due to years of cuts. I am happy to pay a bit more to ensure we have functioning medical services, a state education system and police force etc. These things cannot be fixed with no money to pay for them so paying a bit more is just what we have to do.

Over 40 billion was avoided in taxes last year by moving money out of the UK.

There is plenty of money to address spending shortfalls without taxing income.

But as usual, the wealthy will scream how unfair it all is, 700 billion was poured into the economy during Covid, where has it gone?

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:38

AnnieSnap · 29/08/2024 10:17

I realise that certain jobs require living in London, but many don’t. You do realise that property prices are nowhere near as high ‘up North’ and we don’t walk around with Whipets and flat caps 🙄

You do realise that UK house prices are largely propped up by London and the South East?

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:40

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:16

40% of people who claim UC are in work.

37% of people who claim UC are unfit to work due to disability, caring responsibilities etc.

The numbers of people that you think are claiming UC to sit on their arse is actually very small

Yes - a large proportion of the 40% choose to minimise their hours (gamifying the system) so they are eligible for UC. You could say it’s a tax break of sorts.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:38

You do realise that UK house prices are largely propped up by London and the South East?

They’re really really not. The South East is not the be all and end all of the country. Have you ever left it? I’m in Scotland and nobody gives 2 shits what the house price in Tunbridge Wells is.

And you refer to a “dense population.” The uk is the 21st most densely populated country in the world so hardly high up the rankings.

The population is dense, just not in the way you think it is.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:40

Yes - a large proportion of the 40% choose to minimise their hours (gamifying the system) so they are eligible for UC. You could say it’s a tax break of sorts.

Do you have any evidence for this please?

Aduvetday · 29/08/2024 10:42

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

They’re really really not. The South East is not the be all and end all of the country. Have you ever left it? I’m in Scotland and nobody gives 2 shits what the house price in Tunbridge Wells is.

And you refer to a “dense population.” The uk is the 21st most densely populated country in the world so hardly high up the rankings.

The population is dense, just not in the way you think it is.

Edited

Quite. Hence the low skilled jobs and UC reliance.

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:48

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

Do you have any evidence for this please?

Just have a quick search on MN - you’ll find a hive of middle class benefits theft, most brazenly asking for advice on how to milk the system for all it’s worth. This lack of ambition is perpetuated by people who don’t make a sufficient contribution to UK services. Being a mum/dad/having an elderly parent doesn’t make you exempt from work. Families should expect to pay more for the services they need, having children is a privilege not a right.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:49

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:48

Just have a quick search on MN - you’ll find a hive of middle class benefits theft, most brazenly asking for advice on how to milk the system for all it’s worth. This lack of ambition is perpetuated by people who don’t make a sufficient contribution to UK services. Being a mum/dad/having an elderly parent doesn’t make you exempt from work. Families should expect to pay more for the services they need, having children is a privilege not a right.

So that’s wrong but tax dodging is absolutely fine. Got you.

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:50

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

They’re really really not. The South East is not the be all and end all of the country. Have you ever left it? I’m in Scotland and nobody gives 2 shits what the house price in Tunbridge Wells is.

And you refer to a “dense population.” The uk is the 21st most densely populated country in the world so hardly high up the rankings.

The population is dense, just not in the way you think it is.

Edited

The stats say you are incorrect: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1168072/uk-gdp-per-head-by-region/

London and South East leading this, by quite some distance.

UK GDP per capita by region 2022 | Statista

In 2022, the gross domestic product per capita in London was 57,338 British pounds, compared with 33,593 pounds per capita for the United Kingdom as a whole.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1168072/uk-gdp-per-head-by-region

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:51

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:41

They’re really really not. The South East is not the be all and end all of the country. Have you ever left it? I’m in Scotland and nobody gives 2 shits what the house price in Tunbridge Wells is.

And you refer to a “dense population.” The uk is the 21st most densely populated country in the world so hardly high up the rankings.

The population is dense, just not in the way you think it is.

Edited

It would be true to say Scotland is leading the North, but the numbers speak for themselves.
www.statista.com/statistics/1168072/uk-gdp-per-head-by-region/

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:51

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:50

The stats say you are incorrect: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1168072/uk-gdp-per-head-by-region/

London and South East leading this, by quite some distance.

I’m not wrong. WTF does GDP have to do with house prices? You said the SE was propping up house prices elsewhere. Where is your evidence that the housing market in the SE influences the housing market in other regions!?

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:54

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:51

I’m not wrong. WTF does GDP have to do with house prices? You said the SE was propping up house prices elsewhere. Where is your evidence that the housing market in the SE influences the housing market in other regions!?

What do you suppose people buy houses with? Earned income and mortgages based on this? Or does Scotland accept buttons and string in exchange for houses? The housing market is driven by affordability, which is driven by wages.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:55

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:51

It would be true to say Scotland is leading the North, but the numbers speak for themselves.
www.statista.com/statistics/1168072/uk-gdp-per-head-by-region/

Also just so you know Scotland is not “the north” we are a separate country and not an English region.

TheAlchemy · 29/08/2024 10:56

80smonster · 29/08/2024 10:54

What do you suppose people buy houses with? Earned income and mortgages based on this? Or does Scotland accept buttons and string in exchange for houses? The housing market is driven by affordability, which is driven by wages.

Right but how does the high price of houses in the south east influence the house prices elsewhere? You can’t answer this.

If GDP in the SE is high and house prices are high that doesn’t mean that the SE is influencing the house price in North Wales.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.