Surely BTECs are more like how many degrees are now assessed. DS is doing an engineering degree. He has just finished his first year. To pass this year he had to complete and pass a number of group projects, assessments , presentations (both group and individual) and at the end of the he had 3 exams. Having done A-levels a lot of this type of assessment was new to him.
Also surely this type of assessment is much more like real life work situation.
If you do a degree that is all exam based, do you have a better/harder degree than ones which have different forms of assessment. I assume no-one makes that difference when talking about the degree they have
I am old, every single level of qualification I took involved end of year exams, no qualifying coursework, assessments or group work. But those sort of assessments would reflect more how I work in practice.
All because someone is good at exams doesn’t necessarily mean this is going to translate into the work place.
For those saying everyone knows what a BTEC is, I have only really got to know what they are in the last few years, and wouldn’t have a clue what a T-level was.
Are people as snobby about students who take a foundation year at university, do you expect them to explain that they are obviously not as academic as someone who didn’t need to do a foundation year. And tell everyone they have a lesser degree because they took a foundation year.
My DS’s degree is accredited to Professional Qualification. His university is not RG, not one of the top ten in the country. But if he graduates he will have the same accreditation as someone who did similar degree at one of those universities. Will he always have to explain to people like the OP that it is somehow a lower accreditation than someone who went to an RG university, even though it is exactly the same (the Professional Body doesn’t distinguish between universities, the important bit is what modules he takes)