Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Planned tax raid on private pensions by the government

279 replies

Oldbean1965 · 22/08/2024 08:59

I have read a few articles about how the government plans to raid private pensions in their budgets in order to raise money. Of course it could all be stirring by the media.
How could they get their hands on our private pension money? We'll pay tax on it when we start receiving it anyway, which galls me as it's our savings. Why should you pay tax on money you've already been taxed on throughout your working life and saved?
I hate this government already, but the previous government were a shit show too 😡

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
EasternStandard · 22/08/2024 13:38

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 12:43

I'm self employed. Still quite happy with the choice I made.

I probably should have added in receipt of benefits to that list, not specifically aimed at anyone

Bar pensioners of course who have been hit with the removal of WFA. Especially those on just the state pension

Anyway which of your taxes that you pay do you want to see go up?

Sibilantseamstress · 22/08/2024 13:38

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 10:55

There’s no reason why occupational exemptions can’t be made. Most of the proposed changes would have zero effect on average earners. It’s high time pension contributions stopped being used as tax avoidance.

Why should doctors get special exemptions?
The rules should be the same for all.

Bushmillsbabe · 22/08/2024 13:45

Nw22 · 22/08/2024 13:02

I work in the public sector and a lot of people I work with would just reduce their hours if they had to pay 40% tax on pension contributions. They already pay a higher % in contributions than lower paid staff so would be better off working less. How does reducing productivity help?

Yep, I work for nhs and definitely would. The recent pay rise has tipped me into the next pension contribution banding, so of the 5% increase, I will only see half of that. But as its based on actual earnings, if I reduce my hours by 1-2 a week, then it drops me back down and I will end up with the same money for slightly less work

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 13:51

Sibilantseamstress · 22/08/2024 13:38

Why should doctors get special exemptions?
The rules should be the same for all.

I’ve already answered that. Because there’s a shortage of doctors.

InsensibleMe · 22/08/2024 14:01

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 22/08/2024 12:58

@Oldbean1965 thing is, you can take out 25% of your lump sum tax free. it is not above the realms of possibility that they will remove the tax free status on the first 25%!! also it is possible for them to raise the tax on all private pensions! this will more likely than not, be happening. My hubby is currently in the middle of cashing in all his private pension. even hiding it under the mattress is safer nowadays!! the company he is with told him that nearly every one is cashing in their whole pensions at the moment!

Edited

Well he will likely be having a massive tax bill.
So thanks, from the rest of us!

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:03

InsensibleMe · 22/08/2024 14:01

Well he will likely be having a massive tax bill.
So thanks, from the rest of us!

Indeed. If only everyone was as fiscally incompetent.

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 14:07

EasternStandard · 22/08/2024 13:38

I probably should have added in receipt of benefits to that list, not specifically aimed at anyone

Bar pensioners of course who have been hit with the removal of WFA. Especially those on just the state pension

Anyway which of your taxes that you pay do you want to see go up?

I'm a pensioner as well.

I'd be quite prepared to pay NI on my earnings, which I don't have to do currently. I think the cuts to NI that the previous government instigated should be reversed. I wouldn't actually be completely opposed to paying more income tax if there were a way of ring fencing it, though that isn't going to be happening. I am also fully on board with my circumstances being such that I'm not eligible for the WFA. Does that answer your question?

Laundryliar · 22/08/2024 14:09

AndSoFinally · 22/08/2024 11:47

Why should doctors get pension pots so massive that we have to rejig the tax laws in order for them still to get such a massive amount of tax relief, and yet we also have to put up with junior doctors strikes at the other end of the career pathway.

Because the tax laws were never designed for defined benefit schemes, they were designed to stop people avoiding tax by putting huge amounts in defined contribution schemes.

With a DCS you can avoid annual allowance tax by just not paying so much into your pot, it's your choice. With a DBS scheme you must pay exactly what you're told to pay as a % of your salary. Mine is currently 12.5% so it's not cheap. The only way I can manipulate what I pay in to try and avoid an annual allowance charge, is by choosing to either leave the scheme, or to do less hours.

Not really ideal to have senior doctors working less when the government are so concerned by the ever-growing waiting lists, is it?

If 12.5% of your salary ends up being such a huge amount you are at risk of going over the annual allowance, why are doctors complaining they aren't paid enough?! Loads of people pay similar percentages into their pension, in fact plenty pay a lot more, because their employer pays sod all.
Maybe doctors need to take a step back and recognise their 'poor' pay is not so poor when you consider the value of the nhs pension they get.

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:12

Laundryliar · 22/08/2024 14:09

If 12.5% of your salary ends up being such a huge amount you are at risk of going over the annual allowance, why are doctors complaining they aren't paid enough?! Loads of people pay similar percentages into their pension, in fact plenty pay a lot more, because their employer pays sod all.
Maybe doctors need to take a step back and recognise their 'poor' pay is not so poor when you consider the value of the nhs pension they get.

All doctors aren’t the same. Junior doctors saw their salaries massively eroded over a long period, hence their recent pay rise. They won’t be paying 12.5% into their pensions.

EasternStandard · 22/08/2024 14:16

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 14:07

I'm a pensioner as well.

I'd be quite prepared to pay NI on my earnings, which I don't have to do currently. I think the cuts to NI that the previous government instigated should be reversed. I wouldn't actually be completely opposed to paying more income tax if there were a way of ring fencing it, though that isn't going to be happening. I am also fully on board with my circumstances being such that I'm not eligible for the WFA. Does that answer your question?

Not someone just relying on the state pension though which is where the removal of the WFA will impact most

The rest well maybe you can opt in for paying more to HMRC anyway. I don't think the electorate go for voting in higher taxes hence the whole obfuscation from Labour on we won't raise taxes. To then get in and raise them

Laundryliar · 22/08/2024 14:19

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:12

All doctors aren’t the same. Junior doctors saw their salaries massively eroded over a long period, hence their recent pay rise. They won’t be paying 12.5% into their pensions.

There are loads of sectors whose pay has been eroded, and plenty where junior pay is low, and people accept it because they hope to get to the senior ranks where pay is higher. Big4 junior staff are on very low pay and work very long hours but they all hope to get to the high up jobs after 10-12 years (hang on - bit like junior doctors to consultants?!). But plenty of sectors aren't getting airtime when they complain about stagnating pay over the last 20 years and crap DC pensions along with it.

Putting · 22/08/2024 14:20

Laundryliar · 22/08/2024 14:09

If 12.5% of your salary ends up being such a huge amount you are at risk of going over the annual allowance, why are doctors complaining they aren't paid enough?! Loads of people pay similar percentages into their pension, in fact plenty pay a lot more, because their employer pays sod all.
Maybe doctors need to take a step back and recognise their 'poor' pay is not so poor when you consider the value of the nhs pension they get.

The annual allowance is calculated differently for DB schemes - there’s a calculation based on the assumed increase in value of a notional pension pot over the year, rather than being directly related to contributions. It can kick in at quite a low increase in salary if someone’s in a final salary scheme.

Annielou67 · 22/08/2024 14:20

i generally find private pension changes grossly unfair. We are advised to save and many of us take long term financial advice and obviously save long term into our private pension pots, only for a new government to change the rules at little notice.

Tel12 · 22/08/2024 14:22

Well pensions pots can be passed on free of inheritance tax so I guess that's an easy target.

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 14:22

EasternStandard · 22/08/2024 14:16

Not someone just relying on the state pension though which is where the removal of the WFA will impact most

The rest well maybe you can opt in for paying more to HMRC anyway. I don't think the electorate go for voting in higher taxes hence the whole obfuscation from Labour on we won't raise taxes. To then get in and raise them

It was pretty obvious that some taxes would be raised and there was a commitment not to raise certain taxes. Thank you for your considered response to the details of the answer I gave you. 🙄

EasternStandard · 22/08/2024 14:25

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 14:22

It was pretty obvious that some taxes would be raised and there was a commitment not to raise certain taxes. Thank you for your considered response to the details of the answer I gave you. 🙄

Not sure what you want me to say, I get some on mn are very keen to increase taxes and it's not a surprise after reading on here for a while, but imo we have a high tax burden already and even Labour knew they had to drive the line that there would not be tax rises as people generally are not keen.

Unless someone else is paying of course

Hence the IFS commenting on their conspiracy of silence

AuntieJoyce · 22/08/2024 14:25

Annielou67 · 22/08/2024 14:20

i generally find private pension changes grossly unfair. We are advised to save and many of us take long term financial advice and obviously save long term into our private pension pots, only for a new government to change the rules at little notice.

This is exactly the problem and leads to lack of trust in the pension system and hence people saving less, which is the opposite of what the government should want to happen.

For the record I think if they do remove higher rate pension tax relief it will take some time to bring in given changes needed to payroll systems and anti-avoidance legislation. They also have the impact on government pension schemes to think about

Icanttakethisanymore · 22/08/2024 14:27

"Why should you pay tax on money you've already been taxed on throughout your working life and saved?"

You don't - that's the point of a pension, you defer the tax to when you draw it, which for most people will be at a lower marginal rate than when you were working. You also currently get 25% tax free.

GeraniumLeaves · 22/08/2024 14:31

Reallybadidea · 22/08/2024 12:06

Let's remember that those paying "higher rate" tax are those earning just over £50k. This is hardly megabucks because the tax bands haven't increased for years and changes to the exemption for this group will affect a lot of those on middle incomes. The last thing we need as a country is to disincentivise saving for retirement.

Yes. I’ll accept losing the higher rate tax relief with good grace when they raise the tax bands significantly.

nextdoorconundrum · 22/08/2024 14:33

GingerPirate · 22/08/2024 10:04

Well ...you guys who voted for the Comrades (presumably out of anger and frustration), you have what you democratically chose.
😂

I really hope so !

So far so good 😊

oldwhyno · 22/08/2024 14:36

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 11:55

Fine by me. They’ll spend it on stuff that benefits us all.

oh sweet summer child

Witchlite · 22/08/2024 14:37

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:03

Indeed. If only everyone was as fiscally incompetent.

I think you are allowed to withdraw all of the 25% tax free element, leaving the taxable 75% behind to be taken out as you wish.

i think this was one of the options I had.

taxguru · 22/08/2024 14:43

ilovesooty · 22/08/2024 12:48

I mean that there is too much scope for pensions to be used for tax avoidance and of course for exploiting loopholes for bringing income under the level to be eligible for child benefit. I'd welcome that being addressed.

There is certainly the possibility of the tax relief being a "tax reducer" rather than a deduction from income, in the same way as the rule changes re mortgage interest on buy to lets. So that whilst there's still tax relief, the pension payments don't reduce taxable income so wouldn't work to avoid the child benefit claw back nor the personal allowance taper, etc.

It would certainly stop people who earn £65k from putting £5k into pension to keep all their child benefit or those earning £120k from putting £20k into pension to keep their personal allowance and free childcare.

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:49

Witchlite · 22/08/2024 14:37

I think you are allowed to withdraw all of the 25% tax free element, leaving the taxable 75% behind to be taken out as you wish.

i think this was one of the options I had.

I know you are. I did it when I retired. Most people do. Withdrawing all of it and paying tax on 75% is fiscal lunacy.

SherbetSweeties · 22/08/2024 15:04

I thought this is what people wanted? I don't vote Labour because this is what they do. But yet everyone seems to want them in power and now all I see is complaints 😆