Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Planned tax raid on private pensions by the government

279 replies

Oldbean1965 · 22/08/2024 08:59

I have read a few articles about how the government plans to raid private pensions in their budgets in order to raise money. Of course it could all be stirring by the media.
How could they get their hands on our private pension money? We'll pay tax on it when we start receiving it anyway, which galls me as it's our savings. Why should you pay tax on money you've already been taxed on throughout your working life and saved?
I hate this government already, but the previous government were a shit show too 😡

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Soloadventurer · 23/08/2024 09:13

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:06

Is that £40k index linked? If not, the purchasing power could easily halve every ten years. Would you find £20k as comfortable in a decade's time or £10k in twenty years time. How about £5k in 30 years time?

You'll also have two state pensions coming in, so that's £20k of (currently) index linked pension. I've got 20 years to go until I receive a state pension and it might be means tested by then.

I'm married, but things are looking very bleak for single people with borderline private pensions. They'll have too much to get the state pension and not nearly enough to live comfortably on their private pension.

The government should be encouraging people to put even more into their private pensions (e.g. 10% employer and 10% employee), not cutting tax incentives that will only increase state dependency in old age.

You mean middle earners are getting stung again? Quelle suprise.

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:15

Eastcoastie · 23/08/2024 08:58

Out of interest, did they give a figure for a couple?

Sorry, it was just a general conversation about pensions. That person works abroad and is saving hard to retire by mid 50's.

I volunteered that I was working under the assumption that I'd need a bare minimum of £1 million to retire and was immediately corrected with "£1.3 million".

Interest rates were a lot lower at the time, so annuity rates were also much lower. If you're retiring now, it might be a good idea to lock in the current annuity rates before interest rates start to fall, but I'm not a financial advisor.

AuntieJoyce · 23/08/2024 09:21

AllPrincessAnneshorses · 23/08/2024 09:00

Never voted Labour in my life, and that's nearly 40 years of elections. I can spot politically motivated shit stirring well enough, though.

Edited

This thread has a lot of interesting points made by all political and non political sides. Why not contribute something more beneficial yourself than your tired one liner

AuntieJoyce · 23/08/2024 09:26

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:15

Sorry, it was just a general conversation about pensions. That person works abroad and is saving hard to retire by mid 50's.

I volunteered that I was working under the assumption that I'd need a bare minimum of £1 million to retire and was immediately corrected with "£1.3 million".

Interest rates were a lot lower at the time, so annuity rates were also much lower. If you're retiring now, it might be a good idea to lock in the current annuity rates before interest rates start to fall, but I'm not a financial advisor.

When interest rates were at their lowest, £1.3 million would have provided around £30 to £35k a year as an annuity with some inflation protection built in.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 09:31

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:15

Sorry, it was just a general conversation about pensions. That person works abroad and is saving hard to retire by mid 50's.

I volunteered that I was working under the assumption that I'd need a bare minimum of £1 million to retire and was immediately corrected with "£1.3 million".

Interest rates were a lot lower at the time, so annuity rates were also much lower. If you're retiring now, it might be a good idea to lock in the current annuity rates before interest rates start to fall, but I'm not a financial advisor.

It obviously does depend on what age you retire, as well as what kind of retirement you're aiming for. If they were planning to retire in their mid-fifties they would need much more than someone planning to retire mid-sixties.

If you've got a substantial pension like that, you probably want some of it as an index-linked annuity, and some of it taken as drawdown (ie just taking the money as you need it rather than buying an annuity which gives an income for life). Most people expect to spend more in early retirement, when they're still active and perhaps want to travel more.

You should definitely get financial advice to get the best outcome for your own circumstances.

anniegun · 23/08/2024 09:40

Pensions are a massive tax break for the highest earners. Its a huge source of inequality in old age. We are happy to let children grow up in poverty and poorer pensioners freeze rather than tax some of the wealthiest people in society

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 09:46

anniegun · 23/08/2024 09:40

Pensions are a massive tax break for the highest earners. Its a huge source of inequality in old age. We are happy to let children grow up in poverty and poorer pensioners freeze rather than tax some of the wealthiest people in society

Delaying tax by saving for a pension isn't a hand-out. The government isn't giving us anything.

People earn every penny of that money through the work they do, but they're spreading out when they take the income over their lifetime.

Oldbean1965 · 23/08/2024 09:48

@echt are you blind? Did you not see my screenshots on my post?

OP posts:
ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:51

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 09:46

Delaying tax by saving for a pension isn't a hand-out. The government isn't giving us anything.

People earn every penny of that money through the work they do, but they're spreading out when they take the income over their lifetime.

The entitlement of some people to other people's money never ceases to amaze me.

Their starting position is that 100% of your earnings belong to me, via the state, and you're lucky that you're allowed to keep any of it.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 10:04

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 09:51

The entitlement of some people to other people's money never ceases to amaze me.

Their starting position is that 100% of your earnings belong to me, via the state, and you're lucky that you're allowed to keep any of it.

Their starting position is that 100% of your earnings belong to me, via the state, and you're lucky that you're allowed to keep any of it.

t's so strange isn't it? You've absolutely hit the nail on the head that people see all our earnings as belonging to the state. As if we were slaves, and everything we do and create belongs to the state not to ourselves as autonomous human beings.

They genuinely don't see a difference between the state giving someone £x and the state not taking £x which someone has earned. Weird.

Cangar · 23/08/2024 10:07

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 09:46

Delaying tax by saving for a pension isn't a hand-out. The government isn't giving us anything.

People earn every penny of that money through the work they do, but they're spreading out when they take the income over their lifetime.

It depends - I expect to end up hugely advantaged by deferring the tax. I’m an additional rate tax payer now (prior to pension deductions). I pay 60k a year into my pension taking advantage of the 45% saving then I can get 25% tax free. The remaining amount when used as income in retirement is wildly unlikely to be enough to be taxed at even higher rate. So even without the 25% leakage I’m absolutely quids in.

There are loads of excellent arguments as to why this is a good policy but it not being a hand out is not one of them. You’re correct I’ve earned every penny but I am paying much less tax overall than if I was taxed on it as earnings now rather than when I’ve retired.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 10:20

Cangar · 23/08/2024 10:07

It depends - I expect to end up hugely advantaged by deferring the tax. I’m an additional rate tax payer now (prior to pension deductions). I pay 60k a year into my pension taking advantage of the 45% saving then I can get 25% tax free. The remaining amount when used as income in retirement is wildly unlikely to be enough to be taxed at even higher rate. So even without the 25% leakage I’m absolutely quids in.

There are loads of excellent arguments as to why this is a good policy but it not being a hand out is not one of them. You’re correct I’ve earned every penny but I am paying much less tax overall than if I was taxed on it as earnings now rather than when I’ve retired.

But why should you be taxed on the income at your marginal rate at the time you earn it rather than your marginal rate at the time you take it?

The whole concept of progressive taxation is pretty artificial, and arguably using the rate at the time you get the income is more consistent and fairer.

Not paying cgt on the amount your pension grows in the meantime is the only bit which I think you could argue is genuinely an extra advantage - and is the incentive the government is giving to encourage saving in order to reduce dependency on the state in old age.

Aduvetday · 23/08/2024 10:22

anniegun · 23/08/2024 09:40

Pensions are a massive tax break for the highest earners. Its a huge source of inequality in old age. We are happy to let children grow up in poverty and poorer pensioners freeze rather than tax some of the wealthiest people in society

How do you figure that? You do realise that without these investment funds: our economy collapses.

oldwhyno · 23/08/2024 10:31

taxguru · 22/08/2024 18:45

Nope, those dependant upon benefits will be looked after by Labour, as will public sector and other heavily unionised industries. It's the Labour way. They want the votes of the dependant and need the money from the union levies.

They'll just screw private sector workers, self employed and pensioners.

Exactly. They will gradually kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

EasternStandard · 23/08/2024 10:32

oldwhyno · 23/08/2024 10:31

Exactly. They will gradually kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

I agree with you both. And I think Blair avoided doing this last time Labour were in power

Although other issues, boom and bust etc

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 10:33

@Cangar I expect to end up hugely advantaged by deferring the tax

You're not being advantaged, you're just being less gouged for tax than you would be if the government changed the system. A completely arbitrary, made-up system of tax and benefits.

You're still paying much, much more than the per-capita share of the cost of running the country (ie the shared cost of state-run services, including your risk of getting seriously ill/incapacitated/unemployed and needing benefits)

I'm fine with paying more than my share to cover helping-other-people. But only up to a certain point. And not if it's continuously increased under a narrative that me keeping my diminishing percentage is unfair and everything I earn and build through my own ability and work actually belongs to the state and to other people.

strawberrybubblegum · 23/08/2024 10:40

Oh, the 25% tax free is also inconsistent and simply an incentive. But as a pp has said, removing it would need to be phased over time since people have made plans which depend on it and it's not very fair to move the goalposts.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 23/08/2024 11:44

BIossomtoes · 22/08/2024 14:49

I know you are. I did it when I retired. Most people do. Withdrawing all of it and paying tax on 75% is fiscal lunacy.

Worth bearing in mind though that withdrawing the tax free 25% if you don't have an immediate need is also foolish, as you are taking £268k from a completely tax sheltered envirnonment to a completely tax exposed one. If you have a use for the cash or actually need it to live on, then fair enough. And of course depending on your view of the risk that the government is going to move the goal posts!!

BIossomtoes · 23/08/2024 11:49

Soloadventurer · 23/08/2024 09:12

Wealth hoarding.

How is working for 40+ years, paying into a pension, paying tax, paying off a mortgage “wealth hoarding”?

ThisOldThang · 23/08/2024 11:54

It really is the politics of envy.

Everything flows from jealousy.

I sometimes wonder how many of my former classmates at the 'thick is cool' / 'working's for mugs' so-called Comprehensive that I attended are now moaning about how 'unfair' and 'unequal' things are.

BIossomtoes · 23/08/2024 11:57

My 25% was nothing like £268k! I took it out to pay for the front loaded expenditure of retirement. There’s a limited time window for long haul travel and adventure, if you want to do it you need to be relatively fit and healthy so the money’s put to best use in the first years of retirement. Of course some of us don’t see tax as robbery.

CitronellaDeVille · 23/08/2024 12:01

Many of us can’t afford to take out a lump sum as it would leave not enough for ongoing payments to live on.

Especially now WFA is due to be abolished.

Bilbonne · 23/08/2024 12:03

Most people don't have anywhere near £268k to take out as tax free, average is more likely about £50-£100k

Tryingtokeepgoing · 23/08/2024 12:04

BIossomtoes · 23/08/2024 11:57

My 25% was nothing like £268k! I took it out to pay for the front loaded expenditure of retirement. There’s a limited time window for long haul travel and adventure, if you want to do it you need to be relatively fit and healthy so the money’s put to best use in the first years of retirement. Of course some of us don’t see tax as robbery.

Oh yes, if you have a use for it then it makes sense to take it. But for some (many?) it might not be the right thing to do.

Though, I think my parents, who are almost 80, might take exception to your comment that there is a limited window for long haul travel. They are still going, and have been retired for almost 30 years now 😂

Tryingtokeepgoing · 23/08/2024 12:08

Bilbonne · 23/08/2024 12:03

Most people don't have anywhere near £268k to take out as tax free, average is more likely about £50-£100k

Oh yes of course, I am sure that's right. But, if you can take £50k or £100k out of a tax free environment but have no need for it other that to stick it somewhere to generate income it might not be the smartest move.

At lower pension levels, taking the 25% with drawdown effectively means you can take out nearly £17k a year tax free (£16,760, of which 25% - £4,190 - is tax free and the remaining £12,570 uses up your personal allowance) So whether you have a large pension fund or a small one, sensible tax plannnig is important