This a horses for courses argument. Not everyone is the same with the same circumstances and that’s why we have different options available to different people.
WFH is abhorrent to me. I have WFH twice, once when setting up my company as I couldn’t afford offices immediately and through COVID and never again if I can help it!!! I hate not being around others, I hate not having the banter of the office, I hate feeling isolated, I hate not having the proper work/life balance of shutting the office door at the end of the day and walking away and my staff are all the same.
Our jobs can be highly stressful at times so being together to blow off steam helps all of us. However, I have the flexibility to be able to offer them work from home on odd days if they need for something specific, which they are all very grateful for, but they wouldn’t choose to do it full time. We are all friends in our office and it’s a really pleasant place to be, we have lots of social interaction in our small team.
But, not everyone is like us, and for some WFH is a far nicer, better prospect as they may focus better without so much going on around them, they may have a disability that mean WFH allows them the ability to still work for their ongoing mental health or there may be a myriad of other reasons (although I do agree they should never be childcare or other things that take their attention away from their employed role during their designated working hours).
There are swings and roundabouts and arguments for and against on all levels of this, but the bottom line is different strokes for different folks!
I to though do wonder if, with government plans to up minimum wages, etc. that some employers won’t think that there is cost saving in outsourcing work wherever possible moving forward (wouldn’t work in my company, but I am sure there are many larger companies that it would work for) and I think the impact AI will have on the workforce/workplace in the longer term should not be underestimated!