Such an interesting post. I have 28 YO who was diagnosed with ASD aged 6. The diagnostic process took over 2 years then and was a relentless multi disciplinary affair. Paediatrics, child psychology, speech and language and child occupational therapy.
as well as the known social difficulties my child had and still has obvious physical impairments. Missing all the developmental milestones, very poor motor skills, sensory issues, poor proprioception (perception of your body in relation to physical objects) balance and co-ordination issues as well as a severely restricted diet.
Im sort of glad that the diagnostic process and recognition of the condition has improved and moved on but yes, inevitably it was always going to result in possibly people being misdiagnosed, not investigated for alternative diagnosis or just being given that diagnosis because it’s easier. It’s a see saw. Was it better when we had to wait 2 years for a diagnosis? Or is it better that kids get diagnosed more easily and quickly these days? I don’t know?
I will say my child has just successfully completed a masters degree. Great. That was with securing the appropriate support. Can he feed himself, keep himself and his surroundings clean and liveable, manage money and admin affairs and basically live an independent life? No, not in any way at all. It’s a very complex condition mentally, socially and physically.
my one pet hate is parents who self diagnose their children with ASD. That is a slippery slope for me.
there was no way to financially gain benefit wise out of having a child with ASD when my child was diagnosed. The part of me that sees the good in everyone hopes that could never be a reason for the increase in diagnoses