Not sure if I'm reasonable to do this or if I just need to suck it up?
I had 3 suspicious moles removed before Christmas, 2 biopsies came back clear but the 3rd sample went missing.
Hospital debated for a few weeks and then said it was up to me, probably all ok, but if I wanted to be sure they could do a wider excision on the third one to do another biopsy.
Obviously I went ahead and thankfully it was clear. So, in the end, no harm was done.
BUT
The truth is, the procedure is not very pleasant, and it was worse second time around as they had to cut wider and deeper. I had to go into London for the procedure and a follow up which cost money and took up my time. The healing process was inevitably longer and more painful and the scar is twice as big as it should have been.
I'm really annoyed, I have a horrible scar that still hasn't fully healed (the other original two have healed and faded and don't bother me at all).
It's a private hospital btw if that makes a difference so I don't have any guilt about attacking the NHS.
Should I pursue for compensation or just get over it?