Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

My job share teacher has poor spelling

118 replies

Frustratedteacher1 · 26/06/2024 18:58

I'm a part time KS1 primary who has been working with a different partner for a few months. I've noticed that her spelling is not good... Some examples...

'defiantly' instead of 'definitely'
'scalf' for 'scarf'
'breath' for 'breathe'
'hibinate' for 'hibernate'
'to' when it should be 'too'

And then just general lack of apostrophes and commas.

I'm certainly not perfect but I feel these are pretty basic spellings for a primary school teacher and it's making me frustrated that children are being shown incorrect spellings.

Am I being picky? Would you be bothered if your child's teacher was making these mistakes?

OP posts:
Whoopsies · 26/06/2024 20:11

I am a year 1 ta and my class teacher immediately pulls me up on any spelling or grammar mistakes (fortunately it doesn't happen often!) because it's so important!

Callipygion · 26/06/2024 20:13

I thought teachers had to take and pass maths and literacy tests as part of their training before they fully qualified? Has that gone by the wayside?

Blouson · 26/06/2024 20:13

Pretty embarrassing for a so called professional. Is she 12?

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 26/06/2024 20:16

EnidSpyton · 26/06/2024 20:08

I'm an English teacher (secondary) and honestly I despair of the standard of literacy amongst both primary and secondary teachers these days. The academic standard of entrants to the profession has been declining for years as no one wants to become a teacher anymore, so courses require lower grades than they used to when I trained.

I've taught alongside English teachers who can't spell and say it's fine because the kids can relate to them because they've got dyslexia, too. No, I'm sorry - if your job requires you to be able to spell and punctuate accurately, as well as correct other people's errors with language, and you can't do that, then you need to pursue another career. It's our job to teach children the right way of doing things - if we can't do or understand something to the required level, then we shouldn't be teaching it.

I would take this to the Headteacher or whoever is in charge of teaching quality in your school. I certainly wouldn't let it go. The fact that you even feel you have to ask shows the absolute state our education system is in these days!

Up until a few years ago prospective teachers had to pass the Literacy and Numeracy test before getting QTS, but apparently that was an unfair and unnecessary hurdle preventing good teachers from getting into the profession so it was removed.

Anyone else think that was potentially actually a useful hurdle?

northernerinthesouth2000 · 26/06/2024 20:16

Hatty65 · 26/06/2024 19:03

I'd be bothered. I know there are people who will say huffily that 'I'm dyslexic!' (and I've worked with some of them) - but if you are dyslexic and can't spell basic words then use a dictionary or spell checker.

I fail to see how you can teach primary if you are this poor at spelling.

Seriously, this so illustrates what a lack of knowledge some people have regarding dyslexia..🙄

CaptainMyCaptain · 26/06/2024 20:17

Callipygion · 26/06/2024 20:13

I thought teachers had to take and pass maths and literacy tests as part of their training before they fully qualified? Has that gone by the wayside?

When I trained you had to have English and maths O Level (plus others and A levels).

That was early 80s.

IAintNoMissHoney · 26/06/2024 20:18

willWillSmithsmith · 26/06/2024 20:09

Ooh hark at you!

Call me naive but how are people who can’t spell able to become teachers of literacy?

It's because your SPaG doesn't need to be perfect to pass a degree and most people are only as good as their own education in this area. The government did introduce literacy (Inc SPaG), numeracy and science subject knowledge tests as part of teacher training but they only lasted a few years before they were abandoned.

People often don't know they've got it wrong. Other people don't always recognise they've got it wrong..

No one's perfect but if I was consistently making the same mistakes, I'd expect it to be addressed. It's one of the teacher standards.

In the OP's shoes I'd either raise it with the teacher herself or raise it with the phase leader.

Of course no one here was going to say it was fine and they wouldn't care.

CaptainMyCaptain · 26/06/2024 20:19

northernerinthesouth2000 · 26/06/2024 20:16

Seriously, this so illustrates what a lack of knowledge some people have regarding dyslexia..🙄

How? To teach spelling you need to ensure you are spelling correctly yourself.

IAintNoMissHoney · 26/06/2024 20:20

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 26/06/2024 20:16

Up until a few years ago prospective teachers had to pass the Literacy and Numeracy test before getting QTS, but apparently that was an unfair and unnecessary hurdle preventing good teachers from getting into the profession so it was removed.

Anyone else think that was potentially actually a useful hurdle?

Me.

You also had three attempts to pass them so I wasn't convinced of their efficacy anyway

MumonabikeE5 · 26/06/2024 20:21

I changed my kids school because I was appalled by the class teachers spelling and verbal poor grammar.

EnidSpyton · 26/06/2024 20:23

@FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain it absolutely was a useful hurdle that would have kept out people of a low academic standard from the profession.

When I did my tests (in the driving test centre!), the girl on the computer next to me was in floods afterwards because she had failed the literacy test for the third time and would now not be able to pursue her course. I couldn't help but think that if you couldn't accurately use your own native language, then teaching probably wasn't the right profession for her.

Now practically anyone with a pulse can train - particularly in primary, where you can still do BA degrees to enter the profession, for which you only need very low A level scores. No longer requiring the literacy and numeracy tests means a lot of people are slipping through the net into the profession who lack really basic skills that they are then unable to teach properly. It's very worrying.

Every year I've had to unteach the mistakes a lot of my Year 7 students' primary school teachers have taught them. The number of students who come to secondary school thinking a comma splice is a writing technique fills me with despair!

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 26/06/2024 20:24

@IAintNoMissHoney the 3 attempt limit was bought in after the tests had been running for a few years, before that it was unlimited attempts and I knew of people who didn't pass till they were in the double digits. The first 3 attempts were free if I remember correctly then after that they had to pay.

DelphiniumBlue · 26/06/2024 20:26

willWillSmithsmith · 26/06/2024 20:09

Ooh hark at you!

Call me naive but how are people who can’t spell able to become teachers of literacy?

I worked with a dyslexic guy who was head of English in a primary school. He was aware that spelling was an issue for him, and would often ask me in front of the children if he had spelled something correctly. We used it as a learning point for the kids, demonstrating how it’s fine to ask if you don’t know, and showing what strategies you could use. It worked because he was upfront about it, and so was I, and we often involved pupils in our spelling discussions.
Conversely, I’ve seen letters sent out from the head of a different schoolcontaining grammatical errors, and when this was done often, I thought it gave the impression that the both the teaching and admin in the school was slapdash, and in fact it was quite anti- intellectual. This was a school where children reading for pleasure, curling up in corners with books, were mocked by teachers, and where they got rid of the library! It was felt that one small bookcase in each classroom provided an adequate supply of books for 30 children.

IAintNoMissHoney · 26/06/2024 20:28

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 26/06/2024 20:24

@IAintNoMissHoney the 3 attempt limit was bought in after the tests had been running for a few years, before that it was unlimited attempts and I knew of people who didn't pass till they were in the double digits. The first 3 attempts were free if I remember correctly then after that they had to pay.

Pay to pass? I've heard it all now!

northernerinthesouth2000 · 26/06/2024 20:29

CaptainMyCaptain · 26/06/2024 20:19

How? To teach spelling you need to ensure you are spelling correctly yourself.

I'm not disagreeing about the need for work to be of a good standard for teachers etc. The op would be better off speaking to her colleague rather than bitching on here.
What I am pointing is that dyslexia (being dyslexic myself I have first hand experience on this) is not just about spelling it's much more - people with dyslexia obviously can use spell check etc. But they can write something and not always see the mistakes in it. As I said it's more than spelling.

Vettrianofan · 26/06/2024 20:31

Well she shood be getting reported to the lyne manajur🤣🤭

Seriously though, definitely don't approach your colleague yourself, it's best handled by management.

llamadrama16 · 26/06/2024 20:31

If my kid's teacher had those issues it'd make me quite concerned about the education they're receiving. In this day and age of spell (and grammar) check there's no excuse for mistakes like that.

Slofter · 26/06/2024 20:32

Your examples are mostly from the Y2 and Y3/4 spelling lists and appendices so, yes, that's pretty awful. Honestly, I find teachers who can't spell infuriating as it makes the profession as a whole look bad. How these people can manage to teach Y6 EGPS is beyond me.

MumonabikeE5 · 26/06/2024 20:33

You compile a file that shows these errors.
you won’t actually need to say much. The spellings speak for themselves surely.

northernerinthesouth2000 · 26/06/2024 20:36

Vettrianofan · 26/06/2024 20:31

Well she shood be getting reported to the lyne manajur🤣🤭

Seriously though, definitely don't approach your colleague yourself, it's best handled by management.

Disagree - going to line manager first is not good for the team. I would feel quite put out if my colleagues ran off telling my line manager first, without giving me the opportunity to do something about it. Who knows why the work isn't up to standard etc. In teaching like this, they are suppose to be sharing the preparation so it isn't a big deal to raise the issue. In fact your line manager might even wonder why you felt you couldn't.

EnglishBluebell · 26/06/2024 20:41

Piglet89 · 26/06/2024 19:31

@sanityisamyth of course “me and them” can be right.

For example, said actor saying: “The stunt team worked so hard on the set of ‘The Fall Guy’ that it was totally fair the Academy gave the award to me and them”.

In answer to the original OP, I’d be fucking appalled if my kid’s teacher displayed this kind of spelling. I’m zero tolerance on even the use of “practice” when it’s the verb and so should be “practise”.

I am a SPAG nightmare parent.

Surely that would be ....to me and to them?

Piglet89 · 26/06/2024 20:42

@EnglishBluebell nope: the single “to” does the job for both.

EnglishBluebell · 26/06/2024 20:43

DreamTheMoors · 26/06/2024 19:33

I’d get out the ol’ red pen and start marking and handing it all back to her.
You could always say “If you weren’t aware…”
There is absolutely no excuse for a teacher to make such easy misspellings.
Maybe she’s careless. Maybe she’s NO — there’s no excuse.
She should be shocked into performance.
Or she should be sitting in a desk facing you, and honestly OP, I don’t care who she is or how long she’s worked there. That she’s been there for so long makes it a thousand times worse.

My apologies for ranting - you’ve hit on my biggest pet peeve.
When famous people on tv say “Joe and I” instead of “Joe and me” it makes me want to SCREAM.
lol

Surely 'Joe and I' would be correct in most instances? I was always corrected as a child if I ever said "...and me"

gahhbored · 26/06/2024 20:44

FlabMonsterIsDietingAgain · 26/06/2024 20:16

Up until a few years ago prospective teachers had to pass the Literacy and Numeracy test before getting QTS, but apparently that was an unfair and unnecessary hurdle preventing good teachers from getting into the profession so it was removed.

Anyone else think that was potentially actually a useful hurdle?

In fairness, I'm guessing the removal wasn't for the teachers' sake? The teaching industry here needs anyone and everyone.

I'm from an Asian country where teachers are revered and earn more than most white-collar workers, and while I don't personally subscribe to teacher worship, it's quite surprising how teaching is seen as a bottom of the barrel profession here. Shit pay, poor working conditions (potentially also because of the state vs public school dichotomy), etc.

EnidSpyton · 26/06/2024 20:44

EnglishBluebell · 26/06/2024 20:41

Surely that would be ....to me and to them?

Indeed. 'To me and them' is grammatically incorrect and more oral, colloquial phrasing than something you'd actually use in written English. If you are using 'me and them', you need a double preposition as the only reason you'd be using me and them in this context is to emphasise the parity of the two groups of people involved.

If you weren't emphasising this difference, you'd just simplify it entirely by saying 'to both of us.'

Swipe left for the next trending thread