Since I developed my cough, the OP of a thread has said it's ok to share a conversation she's had with mermaids.
Mermaids who I might remind you say on their website
Does Mermaids offer healthcare advice?
Mermaids does not encourage, influence or direct young people, their families or professionals involved in their care to pursue any one pathway. When people seek advice on healthcare, we signpost to relevant, trusted organisations such as the NHS.
Mermaids does not give healthcare advice. We may provide general information on NHS clinical pathways, but are not involved in the provision of medical care or in advising around whether a medical pathway is appropriate for an individual.
https://mermaidsuk.org.uk/frequently-asked-questions-2/#:~:text=Mermaids%20does%20not%20encourage%2C%20influence,does%20not%20give%20healthcare%20advice.
Thread in question here.
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/lgbt_children/5157512-my-daughter-is-identifying-as-trans-6-months-after-sexual-assault?page=1
I think it's important to tread carefully with this poster on that thread as there's a vulnerable child involved and it's highly sensitive but what I've just read deeply concerns me.
I really don't want other posters to badger the poster concerned (I've already done that and feel uncomfortable to a degree about that but felt it necessary to draw attention to how problematic what's been said is).
It reads like a totally biased one sided leading response which looks a lot like grooming to my eyes. I do think others probably need to see and draw their own conclusions rather than accept how I feel about it though purely for transparency purposes.
Given the entire history of Mermaids and how they have given evidence in court regarding giving/not giving medical advice and the content of the Cass Review which stated that affirmation was not a neutral act and that trans identifying teens were a complex heterogeneous group with multiple needs rather than a homogeneous group, I find it totally inappropriate and irresponsible for the circumstances described. It's completely at odds with it and what they say on their own website.
It's horrified me.
In my opinion it's yet another safeguarding failure.