Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's time to repeal the sugar tax?

119 replies

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 10:26

It's been a soapbox subject of mine for a while that it's difficult to buy drinks without artificial sweeteners since lots of products have been reformulated to reduce the sugar content.

Now UPF and artificial sweeteners are being looked at, as very sadly the incidence of bowel cancer has increased in younger people.

I was brought up in the 70's and while we mostly had home cooked foods, we also had angel delight, Vesta meals, and plenty of other chemical foods. The one thing we didn't have was Diet Coke. We had full fat coke on high days and holidays but the only drinks with artificial sweeteners were marketed for people with diabetes.

I personally gave up sweeteners about 18 months ago and have found it has reduced my sugar cravings overall, so I can see the benefits to me as an individual. My adult children drink diet drinks regularly though - and think they are invincible. I'm worried that the messaging that sugar is bad/so drink diet drinks is so ingrained in their generation, that this will be hard to turn around.

Surely, we need to at least be honest about the health issues associated with sweeteners and give people a choice?

Cancer cases rising twice as fast among under-50s

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c9a913dc-63f4-4fa4-8c25-0faa3301cdee?shareToken=654498f832dfc690127f6e147c127e93

OP posts:
Allfur · 03/06/2024 13:24

Fullrecoveryispossible · 03/06/2024 12:20

I actually worked on the campaign against the sugar tax.
there is NO evidence that suggests that a sugar tax reduces obesity levels. All evidence cited is very weak (I looked into it extensively).
Sponsor of these studies are often dubious to say the least as well.
The companies did not change the formula of their drinks to reduce sugar because of customer demand. It was simply the sugar tax that forced them into it.
like others have said, moderation is key. I for one think it was an appalling tax that forces us to consume unnatural chemicals.

No-ones forcing anyone to consume 'unnatural chemicals', just change your diet, no-one needs to drink this crap

Allfur · 03/06/2024 13:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

We should legalise drugs on that basis

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 13:34

SpringKitten · 03/06/2024 13:10

As most of you seem to be in anti-sugar tax agreement can I offer up a personal viewpoint (which I suspect no one else here will share). I’m not really proud of this, but being honest about my shopping behaviour:

when I’m in the supermarket I know that sweet treats are going to be popular with my kids. They have a long shelf-life too.

The fruit aisle of the supermarket is a nightmare. Fruit is comparatively expensive and doesn’t last well. Child A won’t eat bananas, but likes apples. Child B can only eat hard fruit if cut up due to Arfid which rules out taking apples for packed lunch. Child A prefers soft fruits in general. Both kids will only eat fruit when perfectly ripe; anything not perfect (a small mark or bruise; sourness; too soft or too hard) will be rejected and the “ick” might stop that child eating that fruit for weeks or months.

When I was a child the only fruit I wouldn’t eat was manky home grown plums and apples with worms in. My mum would slice the fruit to prove it was worm-free!

So what have I done wrong? I have done something really wrong and I tried so hard (breast feeding, baby-led weaning on home made purées). I gave in to convenience and now it is SO hard to back-pedal.

The supermarkets pedal perfect produce and inadvertently I have trained my kids to reject wonky or unexpectedly sour/soft food.

It is SO much more complex than just sugar tax. It is training a nation to demand and tolerate whole fresh foods against. How do you do that?

Not only is fruit sold as perfect, but it's mostly available all year round. Growing up, strawberries were available for just a few weeks each year and so they were more of a treat.

OP posts:
Allergictoironing · 03/06/2024 13:56

Oh another drink that's had artificial sweeteners stealth added - Lucozade! I thought it was supposed to be an energy drink? The energy in it was coming from sugar, you take some of that away & it's no longer an energy drink surely? Oh it does contain a bit of vitamin B3.... 🙄

Allfur · 03/06/2024 14:25

Not sure I've ever drunk lucozade for energy

KnittedCardi · 03/06/2024 15:18

San Pellegrino still sells the "classic". I buy from Ocado. It's the one the rest of Europe still drinks! I also only buy standard not light fever tree, and expensive natural sugar cordials. I also make my own. I buy the smaller slim cans of standard coke. I actively avoid anything with artificial sweetness, and also don't like Stevia, which they have put in Lipton's Ice Tea, and now just tastes odd.

I mostly drink water, but as a mainly non alcohol drinker, I need something a bit different occasionally.

HelenaWaiting · 03/06/2024 15:25

Allfur · 03/06/2024 12:16

Why not just give up sweet fizzy drinks altogether?

This. My children had the choice of fresh fruit juice or water. Sometimes I mixed fruit juice with carbonated water to make a fizzy drink. I don't know why fruit juice has become so demonised. As long as it isn't drunk to excess, and good dental hygiene is observed, it's a healthy choice.

Lollygaggle · 03/06/2024 15:33

Fruit juice isn't really any healthier than any other high sugar drink.
I've had to take alot of children's teeth out who drank fruit juice or smoothies.
By juicing fruit you liberate the sugar and get rid of the roughage.
The other problem is that apples, which makes up the majority of fruit in juices , are far higher in sugar now than they used to be.
We are drinking fruit juice far more than we used to and it is another reason our children consume 3 times more sugar a day than recommended.

Nat6999 · 03/06/2024 15:36

It's all Jamie Oliver's fault, artificial sweetner use in soft drinks increased when he poked his nose in.

HavfrueDenizKisi · 03/06/2024 15:45

Artificial sweeteners are bloody awful. I can taste them in anything and can't stand them. When I have a sugary drink (occasionally) let me have flipping sugar.

Artificial sweeteners have been linked to cancer, dementia, bowel issues and also appear to trick your brain into raising your blood glucose levels - drinking sweeteners is linked to weight gain not loss!

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/

And yes loads of manufacturers have removed some sugar and used sweeteners instead to bypass sugar tax. San pellegrino is now un-drinkable as is Fentimans. See also Ribena. The list could go on and on.

It takes some hard work and label reading when shopping to find drinks without sweeteners in. It will be the next thing people realise as extremely unhealthy.

We have fat coke in this house when needed. And we really do not drink a lot of sweet stuff but jeez, allow me to have the sugar if I choose.

MuseKira · 03/06/2024 15:48

The sugar tax doesn't even work. Lots of places have reverted back to charging the same prices for sugary versus sugar free drinks. I actually wrote to the Co Op to complain that their prices were the same and got a "not interested and don't care" kind of reply back from them.

LuckyOrMaybe · 03/06/2024 16:02

Yes I'm with you on this one. I want to occasionally be able to buy myself a nice cold drink that doesn't have to be as sweet as they are, but I don't want the artificial sweetener aftertaste.

eurochick · 03/06/2024 16:03

Of course sweeteners have appeared everywhere due to the sugar tax. You only have to look at what is on offer outside the UK to see that. I hate them. They taste really bitter to me and also give me a migraine. But they are so difficult to avoid now. I was thirsty boarding a train the other day and fancied something other than water. I know most of the mainstream drinks are off limits due to sweeteners so I grabbed a bottle of Purdeys that had "no artificial sweeteners" in big letters on the bottle. Took a swig. It was disgusting. In tiny small print on the ingredients list was stevia. So that's another one off my list. In most cafes and pubs the only safe non-alcoholic drink other than water is red coke. Im off to France in a few weeks and will enjoy a choice of drinks at a cafe for a change.

I agree with the poster above who suggested that in years to come we will discover the issues with artificial sweeteners. So many people have headaches, migraines, ibs and other issues triggered by them I cannot believe they are as safe as suggested. Remember tobacco used to be advertised as good for the throat. Johnson and Johnson was mired in litigation in the US for years for selling talc that was harmful to health. In the future I think artificial sweeteners will be in the frame.

Overthemenopause · 03/06/2024 16:04

Yabu. I've stopped consuming so much sugary crap since the prices went through the roof, if I do have sugar it's homemade cakes not shop bought. UPF needs to be their next target.

drainthebath · 03/06/2024 16:07

Emeraldsrock · 03/06/2024 10:33

Sweeteners are one of the most heavily investigated ingredients over a long period of time.
Just because bowel cancer is on the rise does not mean sweeteners are the cause.

Whilst I agree that it's too soon to blame cancer on sweeteners, there is a plethora of newer evidence that sweeteners are terrible. Both on gut health and on the body's insulin response

haddockfortea · 03/06/2024 16:32

Gwenhwyfar · 03/06/2024 10:36

I understand the concerns about sweeteners but still think sugar is worse. The sugar tax should stay.

I think the opposite. Although pure sugar is refined, it is still a natural product. I'd rather put that in my system than something artificial. I feel the same way about butter and all these different spreads.

TheHornedOne · 03/06/2024 17:30

Sugar is in so much food, it’s basically sugar that has caused vast amounts of health problems including metabolic disorders in the western world.

Everyone demonised fat in food, so the food processing companies had to remove the fat and replace it with sugar.

As sugar consumption has risen, so has obesity, cardiovascular disease and more. Decades of spiking blood sugar creates insulin resistant type 2 diabetics and destroys the arteries.

Instead of repealing the sugar tax they should actually extend it to all food.

If you want to eat healthy avoid all sugar and processed food, and eat real natural food like people ate before WW2.

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 17:51

If you want to eat healthy avoid all sugar and processed food, and eat real natural food like people ate before WW2.

So you agree with avoiding artificial sweetners?

OP posts:
MuseKira · 03/06/2024 19:12

Overthemenopause · 03/06/2024 16:04

Yabu. I've stopped consuming so much sugary crap since the prices went through the roof, if I do have sugar it's homemade cakes not shop bought. UPF needs to be their next target.

The sugar tax only applies to soft drinks, not cakes nor other foods.

HideTheCroissants · 03/06/2024 20:22

MuseKira · 03/06/2024 19:12

The sugar tax only applies to soft drinks, not cakes nor other foods.

And yet I still have to check labels on almost all foodstuffs. Hard to find a yogurt with no artificial sweeteners. Some tomato sauce has sweeteners. I was very ill after eating some ice cream at work (school dinners) - checked the ingredients….. artificial sweeteners!

Unfortunately artificial sweeteners aren’t one of the things that have to shown in bold on ingredients or menus.

MuseKira · 03/06/2024 20:26

HideTheCroissants · 03/06/2024 20:22

And yet I still have to check labels on almost all foodstuffs. Hard to find a yogurt with no artificial sweeteners. Some tomato sauce has sweeteners. I was very ill after eating some ice cream at work (school dinners) - checked the ingredients….. artificial sweeteners!

Unfortunately artificial sweeteners aren’t one of the things that have to shown in bold on ingredients or menus.

That's nothing at all to do with the sugar tax.

Riversideandrelax · 03/06/2024 20:41

MrsSlocombesCat · 03/06/2024 12:44

That’s not actually true. I saw a doctor on a tv show experimenting with a girl who drank too much sugary fizz. She argued that diet drinks make your blood sugar rise anyway. So he tested her after drinking the sugar drink and her levels rose. Then he got her to drink the sugar free stuff for 24 hours and there was no rise at all. Zilch. Nada. So it’s misinformation and rumour based on no facts at all.

But blood sugar levels and insulin levels are 2 different things?

Elieza · 03/06/2024 20:43

Like others, it's not so much the money that pisses me off, it's having the shits after consuming artificial sweeteners that have been secretly added to something that's not a diet drink.

Yeah as full fat Pepsi. Only it's got sweeteners. So annoying. Why can't these be an official allergy listed product. And why can't full fat drinks BE full fat.

ScarletWitchM · 03/06/2024 20:48

I think the sugar tax that is applied to soft drinks (the official name is the soft drinks industry tax) should be applied to all products - the amount of hidden sugars in jars of cooking sauces and pre-prepared food is shocking.
a few years ago Mars even said that their Dolmio sauces should not be consumed more than once a week due to the salt and sugar in them

missmollygreen · 03/06/2024 21:04

The sugar tax is totally pointless. No one is not buying sugary food/drink because it costs a few pennies more. This is just a thinly disguised revenue collecting exercise.

Swipe left for the next trending thread