I've been with my GP for 4 years now and have always found her supportive and helpful. She is also the GP for ds1, and has always been great with him too.
This week I took ds2 for his post-natal check up with her (he is 6 weeks). She examined him and said everything was fine but mentioned in passing that his skull sutures were fusing, which was unusual on a baby so young. I asked if this was a problem, and she said no.
Fast forward to yesterday when I end up in A&E at the local childrens hospital w. ds2 on an un-related matter. They gave him a general examination during which they also noted the apparent fusion of his skull sutures - ONLY they didn't think it was unimportant at all. Cue immediate CT scan, checks for certain genetic conditions etc.
Anyway, as it turns out only one suture is actually fused and he has been referred to the neurosurgery team on an outpatient basis. Depending on how he develops he may need nothing at all, but the worst case scenario is major cranial surgery.
OK, not great but at least we know now there might be a problem.
Thing is, this has really shaken my confidence in my GP. On the one hand she made the right diagnosis (fused sutures) but her interpretation of what it meant is very different from the doctors at the hospital. Did she make a mistake, or is this one of those things that can be interpreted differently? Should I talk to her about it, or just change GP or just forget it. Like I say, I've always found her great before but now I just don't know. Opinions please.