Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think these DNA ancestry tests make no sense

335 replies

CarolineFields · 11/05/2024 19:41

So you get back a score of 40% Nigerian. Meaning out of the tiny scrap of DNA tested - less than 0.1% -40% of that matches the average population in Nigeria. But if those Nigerians are tested, they won't come back as 100% Nigerian, so 40% of 0.1% matches people who are likely to be told they are 50% not Nigerian?

And if you are in Iceland when you have that test, you are told you are 40% Nigerian, but someone in Australia can be told they are 80% Icelandic due to being compared to you and you cohort?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 21:48

cakeorwine · 12/05/2024 10:23

It seems a very arbitrary thing to look at 200 years. Why stop then?

People say "I'm 54% Norwegian, etc" - it doesn't really tell them anything useful except for tracing people who have a common ancestor from the mid 1800s.

Because you only inherit 1% of your DNA from a 4G grandparent. Going back further than 6 generations and you’d only register the majority ethnicity of multiple ancestors.

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 21:52

“The celts" were bigged up by the tudors, but they never really existed outside the PR machine.”

The PR machine meaning all the archaeology and ancient history departments of top Universities? The British museum? I can assure you that the Celtic peoples existed. The term “Celt” is a catch all like “Germanic” or “Chinese” covering multiple ethnicities and/or tribes/kingdoms that had shared/overlapping cultural practices, identities, religions and similar linguistic roots.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 21:54

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 13/05/2024 21:31

I’ve done my ancestry, there is no Viking ancestry in my DNA. Why don’t you understand that? It’s very odd.

You do realise that the DNA ancestry that is "analysed" by the DNA companies only goes back about 6 generations....

And I guess you have some ancestors who came from before 6 generations ago?

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 21:54

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 18:42

Geneologists should go back to the early humans if they really want to look at ancestors and where we "come from"

They do. That’s how they figured out that Neanderthals and other early humans didn’t go extinct but are part of modern human ancestry.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 21:58

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 21:48

Because you only inherit 1% of your DNA from a 4G grandparent. Going back further than 6 generations and you’d only register the majority ethnicity of multiple ancestors.

No

You inherit all your DNA from your 4G grandparents.

Where else does your DNA come from?

It's just different 4G grandparents.

Just as all your DNA comes from your parents. You just get 1 of your Dad's chromosome 1 and one of your mum's chromosome 1.

Your mum got 1 of her chromosome 1 from her mum and the other from her Dad. And 1 of those ended up in you.

And all their DNA comes from their parents.

If you looked at all your 4G grandparents and looked at all your chromosomes, you should be able to match up each of your chromosomes with the 4G grandparent it came from.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:00

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 21:54

They do. That’s how they figured out that Neanderthals and other early humans didn’t go extinct but are part of modern human ancestry.

Geneologists?

Or scientists?

I thought geneologists just traced family trees

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:05

Genealogists. With an “a”. 🙄

dna testing is a big thing in the genealogy world. Thought you’d know that, what with your genetics degree.

the university of Strathclyde have a genetic genealogy conference next month. Maybe you should attend. You might learn something. https://www.strath.ac.uk/studywithus/centreforlifelonglearning/genealogy/advancinggeneticgenealogy/

Advancing Genetic Genealogy | University of Strathclyde

https://www.strath.ac.uk/studywithus/centreforlifelonglearning/genealogy/advancinggeneticgenealogy/

AFingerofFudge · 13/05/2024 22:05

Thank you @Fiveyearsleft

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:06

Mytholmroyd · 13/05/2024 20:44

My son has a y haplotype that is a mutation that likely occured in Ulster in the 5/6th century AD (M222). Problem is, his dad's family down the male line has a knightly Norman surname and they all thought the family came over with the Normans (previously Vikings of course!).

Clearly they are descended from a chap named Niall in Ireland long before the Norman conquest/Viking raids whose descendents blagged themselves a posh surname somewhere along the line 😂

If it’s Niall of the Nine Hostages, he was an Irishman that went raiding all through Europe, especially Wales. But since he wasn’t Scandanavian, it wasn’t called “going Viking”

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:12

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 21:58

No

You inherit all your DNA from your 4G grandparents.

Where else does your DNA come from?

It's just different 4G grandparents.

Just as all your DNA comes from your parents. You just get 1 of your Dad's chromosome 1 and one of your mum's chromosome 1.

Your mum got 1 of her chromosome 1 from her mum and the other from her Dad. And 1 of those ended up in you.

And all their DNA comes from their parents.

If you looked at all your 4G grandparents and looked at all your chromosomes, you should be able to match up each of your chromosomes with the 4G grandparent it came from.

@cake or wine, I said you only inherit around 1% of your DNA from “a 4G grandparent” you have 64 of them. Please read a bit slower, as you are missing key qualifiers.

FluffyDiplodocus · 13/05/2024 22:18

I do a lot of genealogy and know to take the ethnicities with a pinch of salt. But I was impressed when my grandmother's DNA test showed a small chunk of French and a decent sized chunk of Germanic Europe, as her mother was illegitimate and I've later realised from DNA matches that the father was one of two brothers (in the very next household) whose grandfather was born in France. I manage several other test results for other family (different lines to my Nana) and none of them have even a tiny bit of French DNA!

GaryLurcher19 · 13/05/2024 22:21

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:05

Genealogists. With an “a”. 🙄

dna testing is a big thing in the genealogy world. Thought you’d know that, what with your genetics degree.

the university of Strathclyde have a genetic genealogy conference next month. Maybe you should attend. You might learn something. https://www.strath.ac.uk/studywithus/centreforlifelonglearning/genealogy/advancinggeneticgenealogy/

Having a degree in genetics doesn't involve knowing anything about 'genealogy'.

Not having a go, but it simply doesn't.

Genealogists may need to understand a bit about genetics, but geneticists don't need to know a single thing about genealogy.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:25

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:12

@cake or wine, I said you only inherit around 1% of your DNA from “a 4G grandparent” you have 64 of them. Please read a bit slower, as you are missing key qualifiers.

It doesn't really mean anything anyway.

Ultimately, we all descend from a tiny group of humans a long long time ago.

It seems arbitrary to talk about "where we come from" when we have so many ancestors.

But we just stop at 200 years.

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:28

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:25

It doesn't really mean anything anyway.

Ultimately, we all descend from a tiny group of humans a long long time ago.

It seems arbitrary to talk about "where we come from" when we have so many ancestors.

But we just stop at 200 years.

It’s not arbitrary.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:28

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:05

Genealogists. With an “a”. 🙄

dna testing is a big thing in the genealogy world. Thought you’d know that, what with your genetics degree.

the university of Strathclyde have a genetic genealogy conference next month. Maybe you should attend. You might learn something. https://www.strath.ac.uk/studywithus/centreforlifelonglearning/genealogy/advancinggeneticgenealogy/

I don't have a degree in genetics - and I am also pretty sure that you don't need a deep understanding of genetics to be a genealogist.

Just the ability to trace family trees, research births, deaths etc and look up records.

I don't think that family trees go back to Neanderthal times but I know that using DNA is very useful to see how we have evolved over time and spread over the millenia.

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:29

@GaryLurcher19 i think that’s been very much proven in this thread!! Although of course anyone can claim a degree in anything, can’t they?

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:31

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:28

It’s not arbitrary.

It's meaningless.

You do agree that your DNA comes from people who were alive 1000s and 1000s of years ago and over time, it's been passed down, mutated,, been crossed over between chromosomes and eventually ended up in you.

So where "does your DNA come from?" and what does it mean?

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:32

@cakeorwine amd that’s where you’re wrong. Anyone working as a genealogist will have to know how to interpret autosomal or y dna tests given that so many people do them. But what do I know, it’s only my job.

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:33

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:31

It's meaningless.

You do agree that your DNA comes from people who were alive 1000s and 1000s of years ago and over time, it's been passed down, mutated,, been crossed over between chromosomes and eventually ended up in you.

So where "does your DNA come from?" and what does it mean?

It’s not meaningless if you want to know where your 64 ancestors were 6 generations ago. Many people do want to know.

Is studying modern history also meaningless then? It’s from the same time period.

Not everyone wants to find out which lemur we all descended from millions of years ago.

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:38

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:32

@cakeorwine amd that’s where you’re wrong. Anyone working as a genealogist will have to know how to interpret autosomal or y dna tests given that so many people do them. But what do I know, it’s only my job.

Great.

So please explain where your DNA comes from?

You have 23 pairs of chromosomes.
They were passed down over countless generations, subject to crossover during meiosis, mutations but ended up in you.

So where does your DNA come from and what does that mean about "where you " come from and your ancestors?

cakeorwine · 13/05/2024 22:40

SummerFeverVenice · 13/05/2024 22:33

It’s not meaningless if you want to know where your 64 ancestors were 6 generations ago. Many people do want to know.

Is studying modern history also meaningless then? It’s from the same time period.

Not everyone wants to find out which lemur we all descended from millions of years ago.

It's not lemurs we are descended from

But this is the point.

It's not "where are you from". It's just an indicator of where some of your ancestors may have been 6 generations ago.

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:41

how many fecking times….. I don’t deal with “countless generations”. And I’m not interested in the deep philosophical questions of where dna comes from. You are being very weird.

CarolineFields · 13/05/2024 22:42

EatMoreFibre · 13/05/2024 18:57

Since you have given this some thought OP, do you have any suggestions as to what we should be calling Celtic languages? You say the term Celt / Celtic should be used only to describe a type of art. The term Celtic has been used to describe a group of related languages (Welsh, Breton, Irish Gaelic, etc.) since the early 1700s so it's well established. According to you however it is incorrect. What would the correct term be?

TIA

It is nothing to do with what I think or want, that is the scientific definition of "celtic". (and originates around Spain). Of course people can choose to use the word in other ways, but it is a social invention. Nothing wrong with that, if people like doing it, but this thread is talking about genetics and origins, and in that context, there is no "celtic"

OP posts:
Karensalright · 13/05/2024 22:47

Oh i get it!

Caroline means the Celts are not a genetically identifiable ethnic group, they have a collection of traditions and habits developed over a millennium that give them links to each other (music rifts, kilts, dance, irish bagpipes Scottish bagpipes, language links)

GaryLurcher19 · 13/05/2024 22:47

Misthios · 13/05/2024 22:29

@GaryLurcher19 i think that’s been very much proven in this thread!! Although of course anyone can claim a degree in anything, can’t they?

Oh yes! Though it becomes very apparent who is fibbing to those whom do have a higher education in genetics or evolutionary biology. 😂

Saying nowt more because I don't want to spoil it. 🍿🍺