@Lucanus To defeat Russia, UA needs to take territory, that needs troops and armour.
Artillery against well dug enemy, isn't enough on its own.
We do not have the means to make weapons within a reasonable time frame....factories need to be built, machinery installed (machinery that also has to be made) people found to work in them, huge undertaking... private companies will & are making more but they wont do the investments required unless Govts put in the orders.. and they aren't, certainly not in Europe
E.G the UK has a plan to invest £10bn over the next 10 to 12 years in munitions. thats fucking pathetic.
I think Putin is little bit unstable!! i don't know the chain of command they have in order to use a battlefield nuclear weapon rather than a intercontinental one, but i think if Russia was in full retreat, anything could happen.
I would like nothing more than Russia to be pushed back and out of Crimea , its just that i think the chance to do that was at the beginning of the conflict, Ukraine had its tail up, Russia was stunned by UA resilience.... but we dithered, we all did, to our eternal shame.
Russia now has Ukraines measure and i think unless we went all in, with $100s of billions of weapons etc, Russia will not be defeated but the east side of the country will be decimated, along with the cream of Ukraine's youth.
Given the level of intel the US has, IF Biden thought Russia might use a Nuke, then i think thats credible.