Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think part of the increase in long term sickness is the increase in retirement age?

529 replies

Lazykitten · 21/04/2024 08:07

Thinking of the people I know who are long term economically inactive long term (I believe that counted as over 6 months) and nearly all I know who fall into that bracket are my parents and there friends. Dad was a factory sparky and mum was a cleaner. Dad stopped work at i think around 61, mum does part time caring now in her early 60s but really struggles and I can see her having to give it up soon.

Most of their friends had similar manual jobs and now in their mid 60s a lot are signed off sick waiting for pension. These are people who have had manual jobs since they were 15/16 and their bodies are knackered. They can't (and very little point) in retraining now for their last couple of years before they get the state pension.

I work in an office job so can feasibly see how I could work to my late 60s and beyond, but those who've done manual work for over 40 years have the wear and tear on their bodies that they simply can't. As well as other health problems & decreasing energy levels that come with ageing.

There's got to be a sizeable number of folk age 60-67 that fall in that bracket? And taking it further is it another stick to beat the working class with?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Egg7 · 22/04/2024 22:44

susiedaisy1912 · 21/04/2024 08:38

I think the society that has been built since the end of WW2 has peeked and has now begun to topple downwards. Many can't afford homes, one job doesn't cover the bills for a lot of us, the education and health systems are being neglected, we are overloaded with negative news from the media that we can't process and have no way of helping, social media is out of control the food industry is poisoning us, environmental issues are worrying but yet the government can't seem to stop putting profits before anything else, corporate greed is at an all time high and the government seem unable or unwilling to deal with it. All of this is stuff we subconsciously carry around with us. I think we've strayed so far from what's healthy for us that it's making us ill. Just my thoughts.

I think this is absolutely spot on.

Teenagehorrorbag · 22/04/2024 22:48

I think it's a mixture. Lots of anxiety/stress related issues for younger people. And a whole range of issues for every age. But also I think you are right that older people in manual work may often be struggling.

My DH is mid 50s and is extremely fit and active. But he has always worked very hard in a manual job, often outside in all weathers. He is now finding it hard although he no longer works full time, and is hoping to take early retirement. He is OK at the moment but doesn't want to stay until his body collapses. Many of his peers either moved into the office or left and took jobs in the local supermarket or similar - because their bodies were no longer coping.

It's easy for politicians to say everyone needs to work until 70 (and financially I can see why) - but it will have a disproportionate impact on the blue collar workers! As ever!

A PP said how healthy she was compared to younger people due to lifestyle etc and I'm sure there is a lot of truth in that. Obesity was rare until a few decades ago, and people were more active. There was less processed food available and people didn't rely on takeaways - but one spouse could often stay home and cook because a single salary would provide a roof over your head back then. Things are so hard for so many people these days, it's almost a perfect storm for some. I don't know where it's going to end.....

DisabledDemon · 22/04/2024 23:07

EveSix · 21/04/2024 08:23

Yes, I'm sure you're right. I'm a primary school teacher and am really struggling to see how I'm supposed to carry on scurrying around a class of 6-year olds into my late 60s. Given the recruitment and retention crisis, I feel obliged to hang on in there for as long as I can but I'm getting creaky at 50!
I definitely feel that those who serve society in hard manual or physical jobs ought to benefit from their employment status being reflected in their retirement age. Our council's tree surgeons, parks and gardens operatives, cemetery workers, reablement workers, staff in children's homes, refuse collectors, recycling centre workers, dock workers etc won't be able to continue working as late as is now expected, but should be allowed to retire with dignity at an earlier age.

I teach GCSE students but on a 1-2-1 basis. I'm in my 60s now and there's no way on God's earth that I could do a full day in a school. I have a dodgy hip, arthritis, sleep apnoea, a heart murmur, bipolar and various other bits and pieces and I simply wouldn't survive. I do as much as I can and can do no more.

I should, of course, have added the Government would like to see me back in full-time work.

fetchacloth · 22/04/2024 23:17

This government has the attitude of killing people off before we can even retire 🙄
They're quids in then aren't they!

hcee19 · 22/04/2024 23:36

I don't think anyone should worry who have disabilities and long term health issues. The people it is aimed at are the people who have chosen benefits as a way of life. Mental health has become the new' bad back'...

NoisySnail · 22/04/2024 23:57

@hcee19 you really believe that?
If you do you are beyond niave.

UPALLNIGHTMNETTING · 23/04/2024 00:01

Was just thinking that @NoisySnail 😂

OhcantthInkofaname · 23/04/2024 01:27

Letseeshallwe is far off base with this: "Because for the majority having a manual job keeps them healthier and active for longer."
I guarantee it does not keep one healthy. Repetitive injury is emotionally exhausting as well.

NoisySnail · 23/04/2024 01:37

That kind of belief sounds like someone talking who has never done these kind of jobs and has no real understanding of what is involved.

Delawear · 23/04/2024 02:33

The bottom line is that if someone has worked relatively continuously since leaving school, unless they are exceptionally lucky, full time work will get progressively harder with age. Humans wear out as everything does eventually.

AlcoholSwab · 23/04/2024 03:11

Rosscameasdoody · 21/04/2024 12:12

I don’t think anyone can doubt that the Tories have always had it in for the sick and disabled, and elements of Sunaks’ speech were rightly called out for the divisive and ableist language used - especially toward those with mental health conditions.

It’s interesting to note that few if any posters here have mentioned that he also announced a review of PIP - which is a benefit disabled people rely on to cope with the extra costs. PIP was introduced in 2013 under the Tories (specifically the coalition government) to replace DLA for those of working age - purely to drive down the cost of supporting disabled people. The assessment criteria were far harsher and thousands of severely disabled people lost their entitlement as a result - not because they were no longer disabled, but because, effectively the goalposts were moved and the assessment screened out quite high levels of disability. No money was saved because the assessments were unfair and weighted against the claimants, so disabled people were forced to go to expensive tribunals to get a fair decision.

At that time the Tory government prided itself that for the first time, mental health conditions qualified for disability benefits. Just over ten years later they’ve realised that this has ballooned the benefits bill and they’re trying to back track by saying that somehow all of these conditions can’t be genuine.

So what we have is another all out assault on disabled people. And make no mistake any cuts will fall to those who have the most severe disabilities because they are the ones who cost the most.

Sunak mooted removing regular cash payments to those with less severe conditions and replacing them with one off payments for aids and adaptations etc. That’s reasonable you might think, but how are they going to go about assessing who needs ongoing cash support and who doesn’t ? PIP was a badly designed system to start with. It took disability assessment out of the hands of doctors and put it into the hands of paid assessors who are also paid bonuses based on the number of assessments carried out. There is no plan to overhaul an already broken and unfair system, but instead to narrow the eligibility criteria yet again so that fewer people qualify - not that they are not disabled, but they are effectively screened out.

The plan as far as I can see is to rehash the existing system and build on it by taking responsibility for sick notes away from doctors altogether, to train work and health ‘experts’ to work alongside disability assessors, so that everything will come under the auspices of the DWP, who have an appalling track record in their treatment of disabled people. Fridays’ announcement has sent a message to disabled people in this country. This government is prepared to use tax payers money fork out billions supporting parents by paying up to 85% of their childcare costs so they can work. They’re prepared to pay out billions to landlords in extortionate rents on behalf of UC claimants. And they’re prepared to pay yet more billions of tax payers money footing the wage bills of employers who are more interested in paying handsome dividends to their shareholders and bonuses to their execs, than paying their employees a living wage. But if you’re disabled, you’re bottom of the pile and simply too expensive to support. Idealistic Tory crap. The sooner they’re voted out the better.

ATOS and Capita were brought in to assess disability claimants under similar criteria as present in, wait for it, 2008.

The fact is the UK state can't afford more liberal welfare policies than it currently has and they are quite generous by OECD standards.

Inconvenient for the New Labour spruikers on here but the implementation of these measures coincided with the GFC and we've been going backwards ever since.

Anyone who thinks things are going to change with the likes of Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Streeting in Downing Street and Whitehall is kidding themselves.

Auburngal · 23/04/2024 06:15

fetchacloth · 22/04/2024 23:17

This government has the attitude of killing people off before we can even retire 🙄
They're quids in then aren't they!

It will be back to the Victorian days “Sally died last night”.

My pension age is 68. My lung age is 78 years now. Think my lungs will be the end of me. Asthmatic on four medications and holds a Steroid Emergency Card.

Auburngal · 23/04/2024 06:27

Customers need to stop moaning to shop workers about things beyond our control- staffing, supply issues, price increases, the slowness of 93 year old Doreen in front of them in the queue etc. We didn’t decide to increase your paper by 5p or heavy rain in a certain part of the world affects the supply of fresh pineapple etc.

They don’t seem to understand that being moaned at for 6-8 hours a day affects our MH and many are on antidepressants. How would they like it if my colleagues and I went to their homes and moaned for 6-8 hours. Wouldn’t like it.

Customers need to ring head office to register their complaint/concerns. Moaning to us - may as well moan to a rock.

People moan but don’t do it to the right people.

fetchacloth · 23/04/2024 08:33

Auburngal · 23/04/2024 06:15

It will be back to the Victorian days “Sally died last night”.

My pension age is 68. My lung age is 78 years now. Think my lungs will be the end of me. Asthmatic on four medications and holds a Steroid Emergency Card.

I'm in a similar position to you sadly.
My lungs were further damaged by long covid too.

bombastix · 23/04/2024 08:48

Yes I don't think things will get better with Labour. There will be a push on supporting people back to work, it may appear more sympathetic, but I would expect them to do something similar in policy terms.

Vaccances · 23/04/2024 09:05

AlcoholSwab · 23/04/2024 03:11

ATOS and Capita were brought in to assess disability claimants under similar criteria as present in, wait for it, 2008.

The fact is the UK state can't afford more liberal welfare policies than it currently has and they are quite generous by OECD standards.

Inconvenient for the New Labour spruikers on here but the implementation of these measures coincided with the GFC and we've been going backwards ever since.

Anyone who thinks things are going to change with the likes of Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Streeting in Downing Street and Whitehall is kidding themselves.

Edited

The assessment criteria has been changed a great deal since then, much stricter than back in 2008.

I thought the UK had some very low unemployment & sickness payments? Germany and France are far more generous.

Unfortunately, because we have privatised social housing, rent support payments are super high.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 23/04/2024 09:08

AlcoholSwab · 23/04/2024 03:11

ATOS and Capita were brought in to assess disability claimants under similar criteria as present in, wait for it, 2008.

The fact is the UK state can't afford more liberal welfare policies than it currently has and they are quite generous by OECD standards.

Inconvenient for the New Labour spruikers on here but the implementation of these measures coincided with the GFC and we've been going backwards ever since.

Anyone who thinks things are going to change with the likes of Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Streeting in Downing Street and Whitehall is kidding themselves.

Edited

I thought the UK had some of the lowest benefits in Europe.

And having lived through a previous Labour government l do think things can improve. It’s not like it can get worse is it?

Flopsythebunny · 23/04/2024 09:31

Toooldtoworry · 22/04/2024 20:44

Some do, some don't then. Is PIP sufficient to cover bills though?

For me, not a chance.

I get higher rate pip. It doesn't even cover the extra costs associated with my disability

NoisySnail · 23/04/2024 10:12

@ArseInTheCoOpWindow The UK does have some of the lowest benefits in Europe and a very low state pension.

GoodnightAdeline · 23/04/2024 10:14

NoisySnail · 23/04/2024 10:12

@ArseInTheCoOpWindow The UK does have some of the lowest benefits in Europe and a very low state pension.

Yes but we have more claimants

NoisySnail · 23/04/2024 10:32

@GoodnightAdeline we also have some of the longest waiting lists for healthcare and extremely high inequality and child poverty. That is shown to increase mental health problems and entrench physical health problems.
A good healthcare system and low levels of inequality help to create far stringer economies.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 23/04/2024 10:41

GoodnightAdeline · 23/04/2024 10:14

Yes but we have more claimants

But that’s the fault of bad government.

Auburngal · 23/04/2024 12:12

fetchacloth · 23/04/2024 08:33

I'm in a similar position to you sadly.
My lungs were further damaged by long covid too.

Never had my lungs x-rayed.

Had Covid a few days before the first lockdown. Only knew I had it after antibodies test later on. There were no test centres for 50 miles at the beginning. Then had Covid summer 2022.

Toooldtoworry · 23/04/2024 12:22

Flopsythebunny · 23/04/2024 09:31

I get higher rate pip. It doesn't even cover the extra costs associated with my disability

Sadly that does not surprise me.

BooneyBeautiful · 23/04/2024 12:52

Toooldtoworry · 22/04/2024 20:44

Some do, some don't then. Is PIP sufficient to cover bills though?

For me, not a chance.

Well, you no longer need to claim Universal Credit when you are in receipt of your State Pension which is much higher than Universal Credit. There are exceptions to this such as if your partner is younger than you, but this is just the basic guideline.

Personal Independence Payment is in place due to the higher costs disabled people face. It's not in place to cover normal household bills, although obviously some disabled people will have higher heating and water bills due to their disability.