Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

5yo girl with smartphone and snapchat

43 replies

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:13

Reasonable or unreasonable? Do feel free to share your thoughts

OP posts:
Infinity234 · 19/04/2024 19:14

Absolutely ridiculous, how could anyone say otherwise?

Onetiredbeing · 19/04/2024 19:15

Shit parenting. That's all.

BodyKeepingScore · 19/04/2024 19:23

It's a safeguarding risk is what it is. Absolutely no need.

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:23

Suffice to say I'm in the unreasonable camp myself.

OP posts:
MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:24

This can't be real

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:25

MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:24

This can't be real

I assure you it is.

I'm a longstanding poster, MN can verify me.

It isn't my DD obviously, but a child I know well.

OP posts:
WittiestUsernameEver · 19/04/2024 19:27

MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:24

This can't be real

Nope. Just look at the news today. Shocking but true.

"Ofcom: Almost a quarter of kids aged 5-7 have smartphones" - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68838029

Stock image of two girls using a phone

Ofcom: Almost a quarter of kids aged 5-7 have smartphones

The regulator calls the data a "wake up call", and says parents and industry need to do more.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68838029

WittiestUsernameEver · 19/04/2024 19:27

It's terrible parenting and very worrying!

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:28

WittiestUsernameEver · 19/04/2024 19:27

Nope. Just look at the news today. Shocking but true.

"Ofcom: Almost a quarter of kids aged 5-7 have smartphones" - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68838029

Edited

I was about to post this, thank you.

It's mind blowing.

I have zero authority where this particular child is concerned so I can do nothing but express my opinion to parents, which I most definitely have done.

OP posts:
TheRainItRaineth · 19/04/2024 19:28

Really awful. Poor child.

SabreIsMyFave · 19/04/2024 19:29

Bonkers!

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:32

Also, the minimum age required to sign up to the app is 13 so whoever has made the account has lied about the age during registration.

The oldest child in the household isn't even 13.

OP posts:
RaininSummer · 19/04/2024 19:33

Crazy. Surely they can barely read and write... Probably a good thing i guess if they have access to the weird cyber world out there

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 19:40

RaininSummer · 19/04/2024 19:33

Crazy. Surely they can barely read and write... Probably a good thing i guess if they have access to the weird cyber world out there

Indeed, for now.

I hate things like this as I was once the child given unmonitored access to the Internet at a young age by a feckless parent and I can still remember the things I saw but shouldn't have. It's infuriating.

OP posts:
MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:47

I did see the BBC article but assumed the 5-7 year olds were mainly 7 nearly 8 year olds, which I still think is wildly inappropriate. Having said that I frequently see children in buggies with a smartphone I guess it doesn't make much difference who it actually belongs to.
I work in the world of sexual offending, DS' internet access is a very very long way away and he's five. Honestly I'd be raising this as a safeguarding concern, a five year old with snapchat!

Cheerupmaggi · 19/04/2024 19:50

You can set snapchat so you can't add or receive friends requests on there. Some children just use it for the silly filters that make their face into a vegetable/a dog for example. I don't think it necessarily means they are roaming the Internet unsupervised.

WittiestUsernameEver · 19/04/2024 23:04

Cheerupmaggi · 19/04/2024 19:50

You can set snapchat so you can't add or receive friends requests on there. Some children just use it for the silly filters that make their face into a vegetable/a dog for example. I don't think it necessarily means they are roaming the Internet unsupervised.

If they've been given their own smartphone, likelihood is they're unsupervised...

WittiestUsernameEver · 19/04/2024 23:05

MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:47

I did see the BBC article but assumed the 5-7 year olds were mainly 7 nearly 8 year olds, which I still think is wildly inappropriate. Having said that I frequently see children in buggies with a smartphone I guess it doesn't make much difference who it actually belongs to.
I work in the world of sexual offending, DS' internet access is a very very long way away and he's five. Honestly I'd be raising this as a safeguarding concern, a five year old with snapchat!

Edited

But it still remains that some children are only just 5 and have access to their own smartphone....

BodyKeepingScore · 19/04/2024 23:10

Cheerupmaggi · 19/04/2024 19:50

You can set snapchat so you can't add or receive friends requests on there. Some children just use it for the silly filters that make their face into a vegetable/a dog for example. I don't think it necessarily means they are roaming the Internet unsupervised.

No five year old needs Snapchat. Whatever they're doing on it, If an adult hadn't showed them the filters they'd never even know they existed

MumChp · 19/04/2024 23:11

MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira · 19/04/2024 19:24

This can't be real

@MyOtherCarisAVauxhallZafira

It is. Seen it so often among my kids' friends.

Beezknees · 19/04/2024 23:12

Unreasonable and I didn't let my own DS use snapchat until age 13.

abracadabra1980 · 19/04/2024 23:14

Horrifying. Are the parents incarcerated, abroad, dead?

Beezknees · 19/04/2024 23:15

abracadabra1980 · 19/04/2024 23:14

Horrifying. Are the parents incarcerated, abroad, dead?

What a weird thing to say.

catinthetinhat · 19/04/2024 23:16

A few of my DD friend had smart phones at the age of 6. I'm not surprised.

SocialMediaKids · 19/04/2024 23:39

abracadabra1980 · 19/04/2024 23:14

Horrifying. Are the parents incarcerated, abroad, dead?

One is as thick as two short planks and the other completely passive and goes along with whatever the other parent is OK with unfortunately.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread