Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 30/07/2024 22:12

Everanewbie · 30/07/2024 22:10

I do this shit for a living mate.

I’m not your mate.

Everanewbie · 30/07/2024 22:13

BIossomtoes · 30/07/2024 22:12

I’m not your mate.

Ah you hurt my feelings! Touchy now you’ve been found out talking shite?

Vaccances · 31/07/2024 06:53

Everanewbie · 30/07/2024 22:13

Ah you hurt my feelings! Touchy now you’ve been found out talking shite?

I have to say, i sincerely hope you don't speak to your clients as you address posters on here who dare to challenge you.

Assuming you actually are a CFP ? though given some of the numbers you come out with, with no mention of charges, you probably aren't.

BIossomtoes · 31/07/2024 07:01

Everanewbie · 30/07/2024 22:13

Ah you hurt my feelings! Touchy now you’ve been found out talking shite?

It’s not me who’s talking shite. Anyone can say they’re anything here.

Vaccances · 31/07/2024 07:18

Anyone who suggests an annual growth rate of 5%, compounded, with no mention of charges or inflation, over 40 years, is being very disingenuous.

But even if someone retiring right now with a pension pot of £221k, will have (approx) an income little more than the NMW (NSP + Private Pension) will lose the WFP and not be able to access any form of pension benefits, even if still paying a mortgage or renting.

Its not a great deal of money.

Millions of workers wont retire with anything like a pot of £221k.

WearyAuldWumman · 31/07/2024 13:37

Everanewbie · 30/07/2024 18:35

I don’t think 40 years on minimum wage is ideal.

I was referring to the "ideal" iteration of your scenario for a minimum wage worker being able to scrape together a works pension. I'm glad that you don't deem it to be ideal.

Everanewbie · 31/07/2024 14:31

Vaccances · 31/07/2024 07:18

Anyone who suggests an annual growth rate of 5%, compounded, with no mention of charges or inflation, over 40 years, is being very disingenuous.

But even if someone retiring right now with a pension pot of £221k, will have (approx) an income little more than the NMW (NSP + Private Pension) will lose the WFP and not be able to access any form of pension benefits, even if still paying a mortgage or renting.

Its not a great deal of money.

Millions of workers wont retire with anything like a pot of £221k.

5% after charges. Perfectly reasonable for a 60/40 medium risk portfolio averaged out. There are many low cost solutions. Inflation will increase the level of contributions and erode the real terms value therefore I have projected in todays terms. Neither of those figures are disingenuous.

A £221,000 pension fund could be accessed flexibly to provide benefits where needed. A person may decide to spend more while they have their health, travelling etc. and be more frugal in later life. Likewise an annuity could be purchased.

I use minimum wage statutory minimums as an example to show that building a good retirement pot is entirely possible if you make it a priority from early in your working life.

Everanewbie · 31/07/2024 14:33

Vaccances · 31/07/2024 06:53

I have to say, i sincerely hope you don't speak to your clients as you address posters on here who dare to challenge you.

Assuming you actually are a CFP ? though given some of the numbers you come out with, with no mention of charges, you probably aren't.

Its just frustrating when people who know little of a subject try to tell an expert they are wrong. Admittedly, when discussing these matters with clients I must bite my tongue. But ultimately, if they don't want my help, then I don't need them as clients. My issue here is the spreading of falsehoods.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page