Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel annoyed about ‘free childcare’

270 replies

CoolMoose · 03/04/2024 09:36

My 2yo has just started to receive the ‘free’ 15 hours. AIBU to feel like it’s such a joke?! He attends full time at nursery and our bill has reduced from £1600 a month to just shy of £1400 a month (£240 a month reduction). They only offer the funding stretched (you can’t just access the free childcare) and you have to pay for ‘add on’ costs. It’s £15 a day for food….a 2yo doesn’t eat that much, surely! In addition, you have to pay full fees for bank holiday closures.

I have an older child and this is definitely getting worse and worse for families even with extra government funding. When my older child was little I paid £550-600 a month for full time childcare without funding and about £150-200 a month with funding (10 years ago).

OP posts:
Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 09:53

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 09:23

I’m sorry but the continuation of the working population is a societal responsibility. How do you think the economy will continue exactly, if the general working/middle classes are finding it financially unviable to have children at all, or having to decide to stop at one child in a best case scenario? The numbers don’t work. It is not 40 years ago. One income is rarely enough, no matter what sacrifices you might make. If both parents now need to work full time then yes, subsidies should be made or we are forcing women (almost always women isn’t it) out of the workforce or forcing some families into financial hardship simply because they’ve had a child. Other European countries see the value in balancing accessible and affordable childcare with the economic benefits of both parents being able to work and raising the next generation of workers too.

However, it’s sadly very clear from this thread that many think having children should be a luxury preserved for the well off. Dangerous mindset. And where exactly do you think that will leave us in 25 years or so?

And thinking that everyone should be ok because they can simply use these magical church playgroups up and down the U.K. that run on dust and laughter, I don’t even know where to start, because you are being idiotic.

Edited

So me and the 4 and other child free women and other (not necessarily by choice) women and men I know without children should subsidise those who have children and complain about paying for nurseries of childminders?

I don’t think having children is a luxury that should be preserved for the wealthy but I do resent (have said I’m quite happy to subsidise to a certain extent) bankrolling parents who won’t pay for their childcare costs. I don’t think that’s unfair.

scissy · 05/04/2024 09:56

This has probably already been said (I can't be bothered to read 9 pages) - it should be called funded childcare, not "free". When we qualified there was only 15hrs available, and it was explained to us that it cost £5 ish pd to break even, and they got £4 in funding.
Given our DD went to a private setting, we weren't surprised about the extra costs added in so they made some profit.
Does it suck as a parent? Absolutely. But the govt should fund the hours properly.

Where I am 2 preschools (the "school hours" in community centre types) folded in the past year as the funding gap meant they could no longer pay staff/hall hire etc and because they were only open for the funded hours, they couldn't be "creative" in charging for extras.

MidnightPatrol · 05/04/2024 10:00

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 09:53

So me and the 4 and other child free women and other (not necessarily by choice) women and men I know without children should subsidise those who have children and complain about paying for nurseries of childminders?

I don’t think having children is a luxury that should be preserved for the wealthy but I do resent (have said I’m quite happy to subsidise to a certain extent) bankrolling parents who won’t pay for their childcare costs. I don’t think that’s unfair.

Edited

Who is going to pay your pension if no one has any kids?

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:01

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 09:53

So me and the 4 and other child free women and other (not necessarily by choice) women and men I know without children should subsidise those who have children and complain about paying for nurseries of childminders?

I don’t think having children is a luxury that should be preserved for the wealthy but I do resent (have said I’m quite happy to subsidise to a certain extent) bankrolling parents who won’t pay for their childcare costs. I don’t think that’s unfair.

Edited

Where has anyone said they ‘won’t’ pay for childcare costs? I’m afraid you still need others in society to have children to continue the population and provide for the next elderly generation whether you choose not to/are unable to have children yourself.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:03

MidnightPatrol · 05/04/2024 10:00

Who is going to pay your pension if no one has any kids?

I actually opted out of gov pension (SERPS) a few years ago, have a private pension plus own a few BTL properties with DB and DM so won’t be relying on a government pension.

Nodancingshoes · 05/04/2024 10:04

The government should never have used the word 'free'. It is not, and has never been, free. Nurseries would close if they didn't find a way to fill the gap in funding - hence the consumables charges. A saving of £240 is pretty good really - this will double when your child turns 3.

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:04

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:03

I actually opted out of gov pension (SERPS) a few years ago, have a private pension plus own a few BTL properties with DB and DM so won’t be relying on a government pension.

Good for you. You’ll be alright then Jack 😉

MidnightPatrol · 05/04/2024 10:05

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:03

I actually opted out of gov pension (SERPS) a few years ago, have a private pension plus own a few BTL properties with DB and DM so won’t be relying on a government pension.

Haha, of course you did.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:09

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:01

Where has anyone said they ‘won’t’ pay for childcare costs? I’m afraid you still need others in society to have children to continue the population and provide for the next elderly generation whether you choose not to/are unable to have children yourself.

Of course we need people to have children to continue the population and provide for the next generation, but as OP says most parents complain about the costs of childcare when it’s just a fact of life that the first few years of childcare are expensive.

As I said before I’m happy to subsidise (and have no choice in this) childcare via taxes but seriously as I said, what do I get back? Nothing. I’m fairly lucky as I’m not poor but I’ve got child free friends who are struggling financially with CoL crisis, one pays her DM’s care home fees with her sister and what help does she get? Others on ok salaries but not earning the mythical huge salaries a lot of MN gets paid, they get absolutely zilch if they quit their jobs.

Shinyandnew1 · 05/04/2024 10:16

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 09:17

My DM when I was a baby ran her own playgroup from her house first of all and then started a one o’clock club. She never mentions costs. Someone else I knew ran a local playgroup in the church hall when her DC were born/small.

When was this? Are you saying that because she never mentions costs, she had none? I expect things were very different then!

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:18

MidnightPatrol · 05/04/2024 10:05

Haha, of course you did.

I really did! Do you want to see my financial statements?!

The SERPs opting out of government pensions was common when I was about 18/19 in my second job. A financial advisor came to our offices and advised this. I’ve paid into a private pension most of my life so just got used to this and also have pensions from various jobs I’ve been in over the years and I’m lucky that DM invested and told us to invest with her in property. That’s partly to help DB who worked for years self employed and didn’t pay NI so his gov pension would be reduced when he retires.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:19

Shinyandnew1 · 05/04/2024 10:16

When was this? Are you saying that because she never mentions costs, she had none? I expect things were very different then!

Admittedly this was back in 1970 but my friend was in early 2000s.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:21

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:04

Good for you. You’ll be alright then Jack 😉

Why the jealousy? If I hadn’t opted out of gov pension I’d be reliant on that and if I’d had children I’d have had to pay childcare etc.

Several friends of mine have got private pensions and BTL properties especially when they were self employed and also have children though they’re much older (teenagers at uni and adults of 30).

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:25

Nodancingshoes · 05/04/2024 10:04

The government should never have used the word 'free'. It is not, and has never been, free. Nurseries would close if they didn't find a way to fill the gap in funding - hence the consumables charges. A saving of £240 is pretty good really - this will double when your child turns 3.

I agree here. A saving there is better than none.

DB and SIL were shocked that their Barnados nursery was double the cost of where they plan to move to in London (they’re moved across London) but will be down to £800. Of course it’ll cost money to move but they want and need to move anyway.

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:25

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:21

Why the jealousy? If I hadn’t opted out of gov pension I’d be reliant on that and if I’d had children I’d have had to pay childcare etc.

Several friends of mine have got private pensions and BTL properties especially when they were self employed and also have children though they’re much older (teenagers at uni and adults of 30).

It’s not jealously is it? It’s just pointing out the selfishness of not caring about a wider society that haven’t had the same opportunities or financial security that you’ve enjoyed, and will go on to enjoy, because of the choices you were ABLE to make. But then the conservatives wouldn’t exist today without plenty of voters with exactly this attitude.

Shinyandnew1 · 05/04/2024 10:25

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:19

Admittedly this was back in 1970 but my friend was in early 2000s.

People mostly need two salaries to run a house these days. Often people 50 or even 25 years ago didn’t, so (mostly) women were able to take on jobs that they enjoyed /fitted around their kids, eg playgroups, and the fact they had low pay wasn’t such an issue.

Rent/energy/food prices were also much more reasonable then as well-all of which are significant overheads for a business.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:32

FanofLeaves · 05/04/2024 10:25

It’s not jealously is it? It’s just pointing out the selfishness of not caring about a wider society that haven’t had the same opportunities or financial security that you’ve enjoyed, and will go on to enjoy, because of the choices you were ABLE to make. But then the conservatives wouldn’t exist today without plenty of voters with exactly this attitude.

Edited

Actually back in my day you had to pay to go to uni or got a grant. I certainly didn’t have loads of opportunities and neither did my peers. I’m not denying anyone younger than me those opportunities nor saying I can’t or won’t subsidise eg free or funded childcare. But there are lots of people like I said who do resent this.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 10:34

Shinyandnew1 · 05/04/2024 10:25

People mostly need two salaries to run a house these days. Often people 50 or even 25 years ago didn’t, so (mostly) women were able to take on jobs that they enjoyed /fitted around their kids, eg playgroups, and the fact they had low pay wasn’t such an issue.

Rent/energy/food prices were also much more reasonable then as well-all of which are significant overheads for a business.

I’m not denying that costs in general have gone up over the years.

I know a few single women who didn’t have children by themselves because quite simply they couldn’t afford it. These are women with professional jobs and their own homes.

VeneziaJ · 05/04/2024 11:35

Shinyandnew1 · 03/04/2024 09:57

Surprise surprise, the government have implemented a plan that won’t work and told everyone they are giving them ‘free’ childcare!

We have lost three nurseries around here recently as they just can’t afford to keep the business going-it’s not viable. So many people seem to not have been listening to what the childcare workforce have been saying about this plan and are assuming their household will be getting a massive savings. It’s probably more likely they will lose their nursery place altogether when it closes.

It’s rather like NHS dentistry really. Yes, it’s amazing and yes, you might be entitled to it, but…if you can’t find one prepared to take you on, then you have to pay full whack.

Unless another 40,000 people are persuaded to work in childcare (with all the minimum wage inflexible hours it offers), then it will never get off the ground. The government might try to entice a few people from abroad to come and do it (but they can’t bring their families with them here to do so…).

Entice people from abroad! Thanks to bloody Brexit hardly any EU workers can be here! and the minimum income level needed for a work visa from most other countries precludes them coming.

littleorchard45 · 05/04/2024 13:14

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 05/04/2024 09:17

My DM when I was a baby ran her own playgroup from her house first of all and then started a one o’clock club. She never mentions costs. Someone else I knew ran a local playgroup in the church hall when her DC were born/small.

I expect this was before Ofsted and mandatory training, safeguarding, writing of multiple policies for everything under the sun, along with paying staff, DBS checks etc. Sorry but a playgroup is not the same.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 05/04/2024 14:30

I knew of a nursery in the south of England which swapped from older people to nursery age because there was more money in it. I'm not convinced that all nurseries charge fairly. If nothing else, calling the subsidy "free childcare " appears to be ridiculous, from the stories on here. It's a con trick by the government.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 05/04/2024 14:31

@VeneziaJ the benefits of Brexit!

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 05/04/2024 18:10

PapaIndigoTangoAlpha · 04/04/2024 20:16

And £15 a day isn't unreasonable when you consider the cost of the food AND the prep & dishwasher & energy etc

£15 per day could feed my whole family of 4.

My child goes to nursery and has a bowl of cereal or a slice of toasted bread, some form of lunch like curry or fish fingers etc.. and then often has something small like a sandwich for tea.

There is no way that costs £15 a day or even the £7 a day my nursery charges.

Not the food. But the time it takes someone to prep it (who can't be looking after children at the time so not included in the ratio), the energy that takes (cooker / micro / hob / water / kettle / whatever the method), the storage of the food, the clean up, the sterilisation of most of the equipment etc does. Also, my nursery provides nappies, wipes, creams, bedding for the naps (which needs washing, so more energy, water and detergent for them to pay for), and all of the materials required for the activities.

£15 a day is not unreasonable to cover everything needed to look after your child alongside the half a person's hourly wage the government provides per "free" hour.

Blaggingit123 · 05/04/2024 18:25

Shinyandnew1 · 05/04/2024 08:40

i think the main issue is that people with pre-schoolers tend to stick to normal working days and hence need wraparound care 8-6 whereas in my town it’s the norm for people with school age children to work flexibly to do pick ups/drop offs

What about all the teachers, nurses, carers, police etc in your town then? Not everyone has a job where you can just ‘work flexibly’ when you have a baby?

Most of the jobs you’ve mentioned aren’t 9-5 jobs so by definition would be able to pick up kids some of the time? There are plenty of nurses and carers with kids at the school anyway, usually they seem to do 3x12 hour shifts a week so typically can pick up quite a few school runs and will share with the other parent, grandparent and maybe a pick up or two from an after school club if needed - that’s what most people do?

I work in a high paid job but from home so can do it myself, so I know who is at the school gate and who isn’t. Aware that it won’t work for teachers though! Simply saying the way it is, the majority access free pre-school on the school site and either share pick ups/drop offs between parents/grandparents and/or use a club for a day or two to pick up the slack. I don’t know anyone locally who uses before/after school club every day.

its also not a deprived area, mixed between affluent and some social housing, low deprivation, suburban.

Dotcomma · 05/04/2024 19:42

I used a child minder for a couple of years before Ofsted got involved and introduced all the new regulations - every day's activities had to be planned in advance & structured, forms had to be filled in as evidence & it became more of a chore - plus they didn't get paid that much anyway - it was about £4/hour. A nursery cost a bit more but their days were structured & they filled in a daily log for each child in their own book which they brought home every day. This was 2007/8 I think. My child minder packed in a long time ago.

Nurseries are big business today, childcare costs vs a parent staying at home used to be a deal breaker. Companies had to start giving working mums the option to go part time (from full time) by law - that cost companies a fortune - they had to then employ part time staff to backfill the gaps, school holidays caused more clashes and friction. Sickness absence increased - another bone of contention. I don't know what's happened since - I got bullied by managers because I worked part time but the NHS were forcing people out any way they could to avoid paying redundancy - that's at least 10 years ago.

Swipe left for the next trending thread