Those of us who follow Martin Lewis will be aware of the investigation into car dealerships not being transparent about how much of their agreed APR with a customer was commission. We purchased a car during that time. I don’t even know at this stage if 1) our lender participated in this commission practice, or 2) if they did, whether we’d be part of the anticipated 40% of qualifying buyers who are expected to receive a refund on that commissioned portion of the APR.
DH says we should go no further. His rationale is that we agreed to x% when we signed up to the finance. He says that we went in eyes wide open and knew the APR. That it makes no difference whether some of the APR went to commission—at the end of the day, we looked at the APR, agreed to it, and signed up for the finance. His rationale is—who’s expected to fund these reimbursements and why should they? This type of lending was perfectly legal at the time.
The car was mine, but the finance was in his name, so it’s not technically my financial reimbursement to pursue. I’m wondering if others feel the same as DH—that it’s morally wrong.