Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

'Middle class earners' - struggling to cope financially and can no longer afford comfortable living standards despite having household incomes of between £60,000 and £120,000- Guardian

1000 replies

fluffykittens208 · 05/03/2024 09:28

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/04/middle-class-workers-mortgages-bills-tax

Excerpts:

'Scott was just one of scores of middle-class earners who shared with the Guardian how they are struggling to cope financially and can no longer afford comfortable living standards despite having household incomes of between £60,000 and £120,000.
A report last month from the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust highlighted how Britain’s insecure jobs market and high housing costs are leading to the growth of a precarious middle class. These households are struggling to maintain a decent living standard on joint incomes as high as £60,000 a year. That compares with the median gross annual earnings for full-time employees of £34,963 last April.'

“It does seem that the only way to be on a middle income and doing OK at the moment is to be a Dink and living in the north.”

'Although respondents with children reported more precarious finances than those without, millennial childless couples say they barely have any disposable income either.'

Personally we am coping ok with a household income of £120k and still eat out/have a lot of city breaks, but I wonder if that is only because of our specific circumstances

  1. small 2 bed flat in zone 3 London so we don't have a car and where it is possible for DH to cycle to work. Would probably always stay in a flat even if income doubles so it makes more sense to stay in zone 3 if living in a flat.
  2. were able to live at DH's mum for 3 years while working in London and bought in 2019. We were able to overpay a mortgage on 2% interest during the pandemic and plough our pandemic savings into it which means the new mortgage rate isn't as painful.
  3. fertility problems so we are still DINKY and unlikely to have more than 1 child (am already 32 this year).

As a disclaimer i don't think the chancellor should cut taxes despite us all feeling the cost of living crisis as 40% of tax revenue comes from NI and income taxes so if they cut taxes, they would have to cut services and I have no desire to pay for healthcare privately in my old age.

But it feels very strange to read about people struggling in the news on our household income, probably means that the income threshold to be 'comfortable' (without very specific circumstances that lower your cost of livin) is much higher! Would hazard around £150k to £250k now. Basically we are going to be a hugely unequal society where only the top 5% can expect all the middle class fixtures and the rest of us have to pick and choose or live a life of penury and no luxuries i.e. car or property in expensive location; 2 children and no savings or 1 child and savings. Far luckier than those in the bottom 50% obviously but i am not sure how you can say you are middle class when the only reason you can afford to eat out and have nice holidays is cos you purposefully cut back on things people used to expect if you were doing semi well i.e. 2 kids in a suburban semi and a car on the driveway.

‘It’s all fallen flat’: households earning more than £60,000 on how they are struggling financially

Mortgages, bills and highest tax burden in 70 years pile on pressure despite healthy incomes

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/04/middle-class-workers-mortgages-bills-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
HonestPinkDuck · 05/03/2024 16:59

Sorry to be so out of touch but could I ask what is a Dink? 👵🏻

Ninahaen · 05/03/2024 17:00

Universalsnail · 05/03/2024 09:33

Honestly, as someone who is stuck at just under 20k a year with 3 kids I honestly find this kind thing eye-rollignly rediculous. 60k for a family if down south is tight yes but 120k? Oh the life I could live with another 100k a year. I'm very tired of hearing people who are comparatively rich compared to me, (I appreciate 120k is not rich on the whole but comparatively it really is) talking about how skint they are.

But they don’t actually have another £100k than you. After tax and removing any benefits you get (ie child benefit, child tax credits) and taking into account the high cost of commute and childcare in the south, then they won’t be living in the lap of luxury

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 05/03/2024 17:00

Foxesandsquirrels · 05/03/2024 16:58

Exactly. If the people on 120k a year are not eating out, paying for gyms and TV subs than who is going to keep all those sectors afloat...

Yes agree with this.

But individuals can make choices. Not great choices admittedly.

Geotheanum · 05/03/2024 17:00

HonestPinkDuck · 05/03/2024 16:59

Sorry to be so out of touch but could I ask what is a Dink? 👵🏻

Double Income No Kids

A DINKY is the same but with Yet at the end. That term seems to be dropped these days though

Ahugga · 05/03/2024 17:01

Geotheanum · 05/03/2024 16:56

Like I said all my family live there. All my school friends as well.
A cousin is currently selling. We sold a property just last year there so have very recent knowledge of the market on a personal level aswel.
I know Watford very well.!

Look at the sold prices, £400,000 is very doable for a 4bed and if you were on rightmove looking not that long ago you would have seen many more.

You're very clearly wrong though.

MidnightPatrol · 05/03/2024 17:01

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 05/03/2024 16:58

That leaves over £24k for food and bills. That seems enough?

OK I know I’m comparing that to my below £20k income for 3 of us. And that’s for everything. Incl mortgage.

The take home pay on £60k is about £3.5k a month - so they would have £0 left, the rest is tax.

Can you please breakdown your income / outgoings for a family of 3 on £20k?

underthebun · 05/03/2024 17:01

@Pinkfluffypencilcase That leaves over £24k for food and bills. That seems enough?

What leaves 24k?

Geotheanum · 05/03/2024 17:02

Ahugga · 05/03/2024 17:01

You're very clearly wrong though.

🤣🤣🤣
Yes of course you’re right.
How stupid of me
Im just a local girl

EmmaEmerald · 05/03/2024 17:03

underthebun · 05/03/2024 16:54

And I’d expect there’s plenty of add ons that could be cut if required (gym,tv, eating out). Which is very different to cutting back on food/ fuel.

What does the country look like with no gym, no eating out, no retail?

As in, none at all, or the amount we had, say, 20 years ago? It was fine.

I think many of the types featured in this article see eating out as a norm, I see it as a treat.

underthebun · 05/03/2024 17:03

Do people not understand that if you take home 1.5k on 20k then 60k doesn’t equal 4.5k?

Ahugga · 05/03/2024 17:03

Geotheanum · 05/03/2024 17:02

🤣🤣🤣
Yes of course you’re right.
How stupid of me
Im just a local girl

You show me one then. If you're so knowledgeable it shouldn't be hard.

BusyMummy001 · 05/03/2024 17:03

underthebun · 05/03/2024 16:53

@BusyMummy001 yes, I assumed you were older. I think the point is the people earning similar to you but who are younger don’t have loads left over to be prudent with as they don’t have the equity gains to free up money.

Yes, I see that - the issue is the very sudden and extreme increase in mortgages and fuel costs that many of our friends who are ten years younger than us just didn’t have the slack in their finances for.

We were hedged, being older/having savings and were painfully aware that economies crash - we remember the strikes of the 70s, the candle lit nights and cold baths because of black outs and 3hr queues for bread (me sitting on the front of my baby sister’s pram). Those times hit our parents really hard and it really shaped both them and us - so we’re a tad boring and very ‘careful’ with our money. 🤣

Beezknees · 05/03/2024 17:03

I manage fine on a total household income of £30k including all benefits. One child.

BIossomtoes · 05/03/2024 17:03

Onaladder · 05/03/2024 16:53

Exactly my point! The post started with the article about how 'middle class' or the so called top earners (60k- 120k) living not very affordable. The fact you are saying that living in zone 2 and eating out 4 times a week (I order like Five guys for god's sake!) is only for the 'priviledged' is hitting it on the nail. Also if an 'average' person thinks like you, who are all these people shopping and eating out in London??

Who are those people? Tourists, day trippers, people who eat out occasionally or are celebrating.

Ninahaen · 05/03/2024 17:03

CantDealwithChristmas · 05/03/2024 09:34

A lot of the middle class people I know made silly financial decisions in the years of QE as they assumed that interest rates would be rock bottom forever. Taking out overly large mortgages, etc. Anyone with a modicum of economic sense would know that the rate cycle would change so that's on them.

I just think that some of the middle class needs to recalibrate their ideas of what a 'comfortable standard of living' means.

To most people, having a safe and warm roof over your head, being able to eat well and healthily, having a car, a holiday per year, kids have basically what they need, decent sociallife = comfortable standard of living.

If others believe 'comfortable standard of living' includes such monied privileges as several foreign holidays a year, wraparound paid childcare, a cleaner, two cars, designer gear and homeware, paying for your kids' uni tuition, cheap credit card debt, then...yeah, that's not the Government's fault, it's those individuals who just need to recalibrate their ideas a little bit.

It's fine, the rate cycle will turn again soon (although we're unlikely to get back to rock bottom wihin the next decade, in my view). The key is not to take out too much debt whether that's secured or unsecured.

I wouldn’t say wrap around childcare is a luxury: we need it to be able to work

Youcannotbeseriousreally · 05/03/2024 17:03

This is a difficult one. Because so many people made choices , based on all the information at the time. Now things are so different. We have about £180k BUT our mortgage went up 1k per month overnight. We have 4 kids ( 2 we pay maintenance for) and like everyone else our bills are almost double what they used to be. I work in the public sector and my salary has only increased 2% over the last 5 years so spending has taken over!

I am so thankful we know longer have childcare costs because that is what is killing so many families now. We didn’t get any of the free hours and I’ve never claimed child benefit.

we made a life plan, but things change so no, I don’t feel rich. I did used to!

zendeveloper · 05/03/2024 17:04

Lovingthegrungerevival · 05/03/2024 16:15

If you're paying close to 100k in tax, how on earth can you be struggling to pay a 750 k mortgage?

£100K in tax is around £240K gross, or £140K net (assuming all tax is PAYE), or £11.6K per month. A mortgage of £750K is around £5K on current interest rates (assuming 25 years repayment), if the childcare is around £4K (say two nursery aged kids full time in London), it leaves £2.6K for absolutely everything else. Of course, this is far from poverty, but it is not luxury holiday league either, and her mortgage-free and childcare-free neighbour may well have higher disposable income. This also assumes the PP does not save anything for retirement, has no other dependents etc.

BlueRaincoat1 · 05/03/2024 17:05

NoFunNoFrills · 05/03/2024 12:29

People who talk about "hugely expensive houses", please go into right move and look at how much it would cost to buy and pay for the house you're living in now if you were a first time buyer today with a 10% deposit. Maybe you have a big house, take a look at a 3-bed semi in your street: what would the mortgage payment be on that today for a first time buyer with a 10% deposit (remember many first time buyers are in their mid 30s, so a "starter home" isn't viable).

Then look at the cost of renting in your neighbourhood.

Many people don't have a choice about "hugely expensive houses", that's just the cost of a house. You don't get £400 per month mortgage or rent anymore. You're looking at well over £1000 per month for a basic property in most places.

You're unlikely to find a job paying £100,00 in rural Wales.

Good post. We bought pur house 5 years ago for £300k, in a town, commuting distance to a city in the South West. It might cost around £400k now as we've done it up quite a bit, and a bit of inflation. It was the top of our budget, with a 10% deposit. Mortgage is £1160 p.a. , this will likely increase by around £400 pm next March, when our current rate ends.
It was just a fairly run down 3 bed in a town. Nothing fancy. Buy I was 35 and expecting our 2nd dc. Met my DH early 30s. Could never have bought a house before, simply couldn't afford it.

We can afford it fine now, and could actually have afforded a slightly more expensive mortgage when we bought (but not the deposit). Glad now we didn't over stretch. But even with decent salaries now, it's hard to know how we can ever upgrade - both work from home so the kids have to share as the small bedroom is an office for one of us.

The high interest rates mean that moving up to a 4 bed just isnt feasible, because we are 'being sensible'. So we are privileged and I am grateful, but it does seem a bit disappointing that we earn in the Guardian bracket, and can't afford a house with a room for each child.

underthebun · 05/03/2024 17:06

@EmmaEmerald

As in, none at all, or the amount we had, say, 20 years ago? It was fine.

People have always socialised & gone out. It’s just today eating out has replaced pubs & clubs.

20 yrs ago Primark wasn’t a fixture & clothing was more expensive.

What do you think would happen to the economy if spending on retail & experiences went back to the levels of 20 yrs ago? 🤦🏻‍♀️

CrashyTime · 05/03/2024 17:06

Youcannotbeseriousreally · 05/03/2024 17:03

This is a difficult one. Because so many people made choices , based on all the information at the time. Now things are so different. We have about £180k BUT our mortgage went up 1k per month overnight. We have 4 kids ( 2 we pay maintenance for) and like everyone else our bills are almost double what they used to be. I work in the public sector and my salary has only increased 2% over the last 5 years so spending has taken over!

I am so thankful we know longer have childcare costs because that is what is killing so many families now. We didn’t get any of the free hours and I’ve never claimed child benefit.

we made a life plan, but things change so no, I don’t feel rich. I did used to!

Good post, I also think some people on the thread are confused about what the term "middle class" means, and used to mean, they are confusing it with more wealthy classes TBH.

Okisenough · 05/03/2024 17:06

underthebun · 05/03/2024 16:45

The fact that middle class salaries no long buy a middle class lifestyle should worry everyone from an economic (and political) perspective, because of what it tells us about the health of our economy generally.

The economy is fucked

THIS!

This is another symptom of how our economy has serious problems. We are a service-heavy economy if middle-income households can no longer spend then the result will be business closures and more job losses.

MidnightPatrol · 05/03/2024 17:07

underthebun · 05/03/2024 17:03

Do people not understand that if you take home 1.5k on 20k then 60k doesn’t equal 4.5k?

No. I often notice that on these threads.

£30k with no student loan and child benefit: £2,148 pcm

£60k with student loan and no child benefit: £3,322 pcm

pronounsbundlebundle · 05/03/2024 17:08

Housing and childcare costs can easily be 2k+ a month.

If we didn't live in one of the most expensive bits of the southeast, where even the smallest house costs about 350k, then we'd be ok. As it is, we're burdened with a mortgage that is massive for a fairly unassuming 3 bed semi detached. We can't really downsize, the cheapest house wouldn't be much of a saving by the time you factor in legal fees, taxes, moving costs. We'd have to move to another part of the country but DH's job (the higher earner) is tied to here and he has been looking but no luck so far. Renting costs more than our over 1k per month mortgage for a smaller place.

It's getting harder, that's for sure.

Ninahaen · 05/03/2024 17:09

Universalsnail · 05/03/2024 09:52

Ultimately living there is a choice though. I appreciate that sounds harsh, but if you are earning 120k and you choose to waste loads of living in the most expensive part of the country instead of somewhere cheaper I don't think you can complain about how skint you are, because you could choose to live somewhere so expensive that you financially struggle.

I am disabled so I'll never be able to get more then I get and releastically my income will go down as my kids leave and being able to choose to live in London just wont ever be on my radar and I'd love to live closer to London.

But why should someone who is from London have to move to the other end of the country?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.