Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask for help? Boring data/graphs/tables question!

13 replies

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:38

I’ve collected quite a big data sample and I’ve sorted it from smallest to largest and then picked out the 5 smallest ‘values’, if that makes sense.

I’m not sure what is the clearest way of presenting the data selection of the smallest values though, because they are taken from a period of several years (5 years) and all of the categories are different. I don’t think a graph or a table would be suitable.

I’ve attached a photo to give a made-up example of the data I’ve collected, in case that helps.

Can anyone help please with suggesting the best way to present this? Thanks!

To ask for help? Boring data/graphs/tables question!
OP posts:
GRex · 23/02/2024 17:44

It depends where you want the emphasis.
Stacked bar chart by year is most common, sorted from largest in first year.
Bubble chart might also work.

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:46

What are you trying to represent? Why the 5 smallest?

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:48

Thanks GRex! I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year, if that makes sense. Is there a way to show this just by using the data I included in the attached photo on my OP?

OP posts:
ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:49

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:46

What are you trying to represent? Why the 5 smallest?

@Noodledoodledoo I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 23/02/2024 17:51

Feed it into ChatGPT ....

menopausalmare · 23/02/2024 17:54

Your data is categoric. Therefore, a bar chart 📊 is needed.

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:54

You need the data sorted into year groups. Then a stacked bar for each year I would say

AutumnCrow · 23/02/2024 17:56

Are you confident about your category definition(s)?

How are you defining 'chocolate brands'? Your data here seems to be conflating two things (type of chocolate bar and brand).

I know you've said that this is made-up data, but I'd be a bit concerned that your real data is accurately categorised prior to experimenting with presentation.

meganorks · 23/02/2024 18:00

Would you be better of averaging across the 5 years first and then just having one bar chart? Is there a reason to show each of the five years separately?

Ilovemyshed · 23/02/2024 18:02

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:48

Thanks GRex! I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year, if that makes sense. Is there a way to show this just by using the data I included in the attached photo on my OP?

Pie chart in shades of grey with the smallest sellers highlighted in colour.

bookandabrew · 23/02/2024 18:14

There's some guidance on chart types etc. here which might be useful: analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/policy-store/data-visualisation-charts/#section-3

meganorks · 23/02/2024 18:49

You can't do a pie chart - that is for when something adds up to 100% and this isn't even % its numbers. I would do 5 mini bar charts on one slide, one for each year. Then if you have the same chocolate bar in different years you could colour code them

GrumpyInsomniac · 23/02/2024 18:56

Beyond the fact that this is what you want to show, my question would be why you want to show them, so as to choose the best presentation.

I would probably consider different options if the years were to be viewed in isolation, than I would if I wanted to show the evolution over five years and any increase/decline of specific bars in that period that could be attributed to specific campaigns, for example.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread