Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask for help? Boring data/graphs/tables question!

13 replies

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:38

I’ve collected quite a big data sample and I’ve sorted it from smallest to largest and then picked out the 5 smallest ‘values’, if that makes sense.

I’m not sure what is the clearest way of presenting the data selection of the smallest values though, because they are taken from a period of several years (5 years) and all of the categories are different. I don’t think a graph or a table would be suitable.

I’ve attached a photo to give a made-up example of the data I’ve collected, in case that helps.

Can anyone help please with suggesting the best way to present this? Thanks!

To ask for help? Boring data/graphs/tables question!
OP posts:
GRex · 23/02/2024 17:44

It depends where you want the emphasis.
Stacked bar chart by year is most common, sorted from largest in first year.
Bubble chart might also work.

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:46

What are you trying to represent? Why the 5 smallest?

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:48

Thanks GRex! I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year, if that makes sense. Is there a way to show this just by using the data I included in the attached photo on my OP?

OP posts:
ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:49

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:46

What are you trying to represent? Why the 5 smallest?

@Noodledoodledoo I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 23/02/2024 17:51

Feed it into ChatGPT ....

menopausalmare · 23/02/2024 17:54

Your data is categoric. Therefore, a bar chart 📊 is needed.

Noodledoodledoo · 23/02/2024 17:54

You need the data sorted into year groups. Then a stacked bar for each year I would say

AutumnCrow · 23/02/2024 17:56

Are you confident about your category definition(s)?

How are you defining 'chocolate brands'? Your data here seems to be conflating two things (type of chocolate bar and brand).

I know you've said that this is made-up data, but I'd be a bit concerned that your real data is accurately categorised prior to experimenting with presentation.

meganorks · 23/02/2024 18:00

Would you be better of averaging across the 5 years first and then just having one bar chart? Is there a reason to show each of the five years separately?

Ilovemyshed · 23/02/2024 18:02

ComingUpTrumps · 23/02/2024 17:48

Thanks GRex! I’m trying to find out and emphasise which chocolate brands sold the least each year, if that makes sense. Is there a way to show this just by using the data I included in the attached photo on my OP?

Pie chart in shades of grey with the smallest sellers highlighted in colour.

bookandabrew · 23/02/2024 18:14

There's some guidance on chart types etc. here which might be useful: analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/policy-store/data-visualisation-charts/#section-3

meganorks · 23/02/2024 18:49

You can't do a pie chart - that is for when something adds up to 100% and this isn't even % its numbers. I would do 5 mini bar charts on one slide, one for each year. Then if you have the same chocolate bar in different years you could colour code them

GrumpyInsomniac · 23/02/2024 18:56

Beyond the fact that this is what you want to show, my question would be why you want to show them, so as to choose the best presentation.

I would probably consider different options if the years were to be viewed in isolation, than I would if I wanted to show the evolution over five years and any increase/decline of specific bars in that period that could be attributed to specific campaigns, for example.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page