Triggered by another thread, but this is something that has been on my mind for a while.
As a society, we value 'romantic' love above all others. If someone posts on MN saying that they have been 'crying all night' over breaking up with a BF they have been with for less than a year, we are all (rightly) compassionate and understanding of a broken heart.
If the same poster posts that they have been 'crying all night' over falling out with their best friend of many years, people pile on to say that it's a bit OTT and tell the OP that they sound 'clingy' and 'intense'.
Why do we place such little value on platonic love? This is often a relationship that has endured years and hurdles, holidays and life-events - is the 'sex' thing really the game-changer?
I genuinely don't know the answer and I have been thinking a lot about the differences lately. I love DH and have been with him for decades. I also have a best friends that I have known even longer. The love is different but they are both constants and losing either of them would break my heart.
I don't know. Just musing really... but I just feel that we need to start giving platonic love the power and credit it deserves.