DD is in year 11. Has sat around the 6-7 mark for science throughout school, and was advised to consider triple science for GCSE. They chose to do double and have been in higher paper set.
Throughout year 10, good marks, predicted 6. Happy with progress.
However, Autumn mocks were a disaster. Exams were a couple of weeks after holidays, DD did minimal revision and, by coincidence, had unrelated family dramas the night before 2 of the 3 science exams. Got an overall grade of 33 including a 4 in biology which is her strongest subject.
This was hugely disappointing but proved to be a massive kick up arse and since day of results has been revising and generally getting head down.
We had a meeting a couple of weeks after mocks with science teacher who wanted to put DD into foundation paper (maximum possible grade 55), ideally immediately. I pushed back, based on previous results and because it ruled out biology as A-level which at the time he was considering (would need 66) and requested this happen after second round of mocks in new year.
Teacher reluctantly agreed, reiterated need to revise.
As above, DD has got head down, hugely motivated by threat of moving set. She's been assessed once since then and got great marks (over 70%).
So mocks are next week, and yesterday, DD teacher announced set changes. 1/3 of class are going to do foundation paper, including DD.
She came home absolutely gutted, totally flat and of course, demotivated to do any revision for any subjects this weekend..
I totally understand they don't want her to fail altogether so foundation may well be most appropriate, but going on back on agreed plans without any discussion is poor in my opinion.
Is this out of order or am I being unrealistic about what DD can achieve?