Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What historical event do you think would have changed history if it had turned out differently?

370 replies

MaryQueenofKnots · 22/12/2023 02:49

Here's mine:
What if Edward VI had lived?
What if JFK hadn't been shot?
What if Edward VIII hadn't abdicated?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Iwantmyoldnameback · 22/12/2023 08:56

If Margaret Thatcher hasn't introduced RTB.

ConnieCroydon · 22/12/2023 08:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.

readymealeater · 22/12/2023 08:58

BoredofBlonde · 22/12/2023 08:27

If Mr and Mrs Hitler hadn't have had sex that night

Or if she'd given him a BJ instead...ahem! 😳

Hotgoose · 22/12/2023 08:59

If Henry VIII hadn’t left the catholic church we’d likely still
be a catholic country.
And 9/11

AngelaRippingMyLegIntheAir · 22/12/2023 09:00

MooseBeTimeForSnow · 22/12/2023 03:33

What if Tim Berners-Lee hadn’t invented the World Wide Web?

You know I was thinking about this the other day - how the hell did we manage to get anywhere? Booking a flight was a major task involving a trip to a travel agent, them pulling out this massive printed book about 8 inches thick , making some calls and hand writing a ticket for you. This was 1974 - it's mental.

readymealeater · 22/12/2023 09:00

In an interview for Women’s Own in September 1987, Margaret Thatcher said:
"Who is society? There is no such thing! There are individual men and women and there are families and no government can do anything except through people and people look to themselves first. It is our duty to look after ourselves and then also to help look after our neighbour and life is a reciprocal business …"

Why 'there's no such thing as society' should not be regarded with moral revulsion (theconversation.com)

Interview for Woman's Own ("no such thing [as society]") | Margaret Thatcher Foundation

https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689

Candleabra · 22/12/2023 09:01

If Margaret Beaufort hadn’t given birth to a son at the age of 13 (Henry VII) - and they both survived - who then founded the Tudor dynasty and all subsequent monarchs are descended from him. I often ponder the unlikely set of events that led to his birth (and also feel so sorry for Margaret, imagine what she must have gone through as a child herself).

MujeresLibres · 22/12/2023 09:03

readymealeater · 22/12/2023 09:00

In an interview for Women’s Own in September 1987, Margaret Thatcher said:
"Who is society? There is no such thing! There are individual men and women and there are families and no government can do anything except through people and people look to themselves first. It is our duty to look after ourselves and then also to help look after our neighbour and life is a reciprocal business …"

Why 'there's no such thing as society' should not be regarded with moral revulsion (theconversation.com)

Yes, this. I'm really not a fan of Thatcher, but the point she was making here is the exact opposite to the one people think when they take the line about society in isolation. She's arguing that everyone has a duty to help others and that cannot simply be delegated to the government.

Longlazyday · 22/12/2023 09:11

I have learned something really important. Didn’t know Thatcher’s quote in context.

Damnloginpopup · 22/12/2023 09:14

If my dad hadn't offered my mum his seat I'd not be here and therefore none of this would exist.

Alternatively, imagine if they were the original Adam and Eve...or if Eve was Steve.

History is a rolling stone, it gathers moss and flings it wherever. Every event is preceded so every moment from the big bang (and of course what preceded that) has determined right now...and right now determines the course of the next forever.

Netaporter · 22/12/2023 09:18

i think your view on MT depends on where you were in the UK. Absolutely revolutionised the area in which I grew up in for the better, but I appreciate if you grew up in a mining town, your viewpoint would be very different.

for me personally, I think the impact of growing up with the PM and the head of state both being women cannot be underestimated on the aspirations of young women in the UK. Whatever your politics, finally having a woman in charge did seem revolutionary at the time.

MrsJellybee · 22/12/2023 09:18

Candleabra · 22/12/2023 09:01

If Margaret Beaufort hadn’t given birth to a son at the age of 13 (Henry VII) - and they both survived - who then founded the Tudor dynasty and all subsequent monarchs are descended from him. I often ponder the unlikely set of events that led to his birth (and also feel so sorry for Margaret, imagine what she must have gone through as a child herself).

It’s unfathomable. I always wonder at the lifelong birth injuries she must’ve had. Married twice more after Edmund Tudor died, but no further children. Imagine being a widowed mother at 13. I believe Margaret asked to be buried next to Edmund Tudor so she likely viewed him as her true husband despite their brief marriage. I guess as the father of her beloved son, she revered him.

JamSandle · 22/12/2023 09:21

If humans had never learnt to make fire.

If some of our earlier ancestors hadn't died out and coexisted with us. How would that feed into the hierarchy of how we treat other species, even those similar to our own?

If humans had never evolved opposable thumbs.

MrsRachelDanvers · 22/12/2023 09:39

If Edward 4 hadn’t died so suddenly aged 40. No princes in tower, no Tudors-his son would’ve succeeded him and Richard 3 would’ve been a footnote rather than one of our great villains. Also, if Harold had won Battle of Hastings-women had more rights in Saxon society, unlike the feudal Normans. No harrying if the North which left thousands dead through famine. Or if Henry 1’s so. Hadn’t drowned in the White Ship-no civil war which devastated the country.

MaryQueenofKnots · 22/12/2023 09:43

@LoobyDop I stand corrected. Thanks! Every day is a school day.

OP posts:
SleepingStandingUp · 22/12/2023 09:44

Netaporter · 22/12/2023 04:21

If anyone wants to watch lighthearted nonsense about what could’ve happened if the Russians had landed on the moon first, and the potential implications, watch ‘For all mankind’ on Apple TV. It is a good old yarn about the space race and the colonisation of the moon and mars. Love to watch the real history mingle into the alternate historical storyline - President Al Gore etc.

We live that show. They put so much thought into the new series historical updates

Sauerkrautsandwich · 22/12/2023 09:44

PeanutAndBanana · 22/12/2023 08:48

Arguably the whole trajectory of the Middle East would be different if WW1 had had a different outcome. Certainly the British would have not had a role in carving up the post-Ottoman lands and establishing the Palestinian Mandate. I think about that a lot - to the poster whose dad said Franz Ferdinand should have been in a different car, only up to a point as I think the war would have happened anyway but certainly much of our current reality would be very different if WW1 had not happened or had a different end point.

I think the war would look completely different if Austria-Hungary didn't declare it because of the Sarajevo incident. It may have been someone else who would start off because of the existing political tensions and that could lead to some different alliances and results.
Lots of what ifs of course.

SleepingStandingUp · 22/12/2023 09:45

Firefly1987 · 22/12/2023 04:47

Yes but he didn't have any children? So Elizabeth would've been Queen anyway when he died in 1972, having outlived Elizabeth's father by that point.

But if he hadn't have abdicated, he may well have married for duty and sired an heir. The implications in real terms for anyone beyond Elizabeth and her kids, I don't know

MaryQueenofKnots · 22/12/2023 09:46

Another Tudor one, if Henry VIII had children with Katherine Howard. He apparently was saddened by her death more than for any other of his wives. She was young, although he was likely impotent, and so arguably could have had his child by hook or by crook. It makes me so sad to think of her, as Mary Wolsey puts it 'an abused child' rather than the Scarlett woman she's been portrayed as. Passed around court like a piece of meat and then murdered for it.

OP posts:
GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 22/12/2023 09:48

If the Spanish Armada had succeeded…

MaryQueenofKnots · 22/12/2023 09:49

@MrsJellybee you can visit Pembroke castle where she gave birth and there's a lot of information about her in there.

OP posts:
KnickerlessParsons · 22/12/2023 09:49

It's not a single event, but our language would have been very different if the Romans hadn't got this far.
1066 also resulted in changes to the language.

ConnieCroydon · 22/12/2023 09:51

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.

LoobyDop · 22/12/2023 09:52

Something I’ve never understood about Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon’s failure to produce a male heir- why didn’t they just cheat? It wouldn’t have been that difficult to pretend that one of her miscarriages never happened, find some unfortunate pregnant waif, and keep her confined with Catherine until the baby was born.

MaryQueenofKnots · 22/12/2023 09:56

@LoobyDop they wanted to carry on their bloodline. It was all about their respective dynasties. Henry had plenty of illegitimate children, it would have made more sense to have used one of them but illegitimacy was a big deal. They needed it to be their child.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread