Never before has there been such an apparent controversy over how 'worthy' or not a winner is. And despite all of Mary Earp's sporting success, it's her dress that both men and women are focused on. I feel like this year's award has unearthed Darwin's missing link.
People may disagree that she.was the most deserving and are entitled to their opinion. But it was a public vote and the majority voted for her. It's the double standards and inconsistency of (mostly male) arguments that gets to me. Irritated because two female footballers have won it two years in a row, yet they were silent when two male cyclists won it two years in a row.
It doesn't feel like we've progressed very much in several decades does it? Women may finally be getting the recognition they deserve, but they're still held to higher standards and expectations than men, and their 'worthiness' credentials picked and pored over in a way that simply doesn't exist for men.