Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this is winding up a service user

6 replies

Getwithit7 · 22/11/2023 23:36

Patient in hospital needs the loo states they are feeling uncomfortable and unable to sleep and the staff member replies I know it’s only a few more minutes they were waiting for someone of the same sex as the patient.

OP posts:
panca · 22/11/2023 23:37

No. Unless that staff member was the same sex as the patient

Returnsreturnsandmorereturns · 22/11/2023 23:38

What makes you think it’s winding the person up? It may do but nothing in your description suggests that was the aim.

WetBandits · 22/11/2023 23:56

I feel like I’ve read this exact post before.

However, it’s perfectly acceptable to wait for a staff member who is the same sex as the patient/service user if there is a good reason to do so. Capacity issues and a patient’s personal history are two good reasons I can think of off the top of my head.

It’s not ‘winding them up’.

pannikin · 23/11/2023 00:02

If they're in hospital they're a patient not a service user
And no it's not 'winding them up'. How do you know the pt hasn't previously stated they only want assistance/personal care from a member of staff the same sex as them?

WhereIsBebèsChambre · 23/11/2023 00:06

Or that the risk assessment is in place that staff need to be the same sex.

Why does the 'service user'/ or someone on their behalf see it as being wound up that someone the same sex as them is to take them to the toilet?

Got2getout · 23/11/2023 00:14

From your post I can’t really tell what the problem is. It sounds like a normal, appropriate interaction.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread