Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what the country was like under a Labour government?

1000 replies

user6776 · 13/11/2023 20:14

I'm too young to remember a proper Labour government. I was 12 when the Tories got voted in back in 2010 so that's all I've ever really known.

How much better was it than it is now? Why did Labour lose the election back then anyway?

Interested to hear people's opinions.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
48
verdantverdure · 14/11/2023 20:23

NeelyOHara1 · 14/11/2023 20:16

The Labour Party or the New Labour Party?

That might depend on age I imagine.

I'm 44 and I've only experienced one Labour government.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 14/11/2023 20:25

verdantverdure · 14/11/2023 20:07

I do too.

We didn't feel it anything like we're feeling the pinch right now.

Though Darling is on record as saying that the impact of COVID would be much much worse than that of the financial crisis, and called for an early and clear plan for the lifting of lockdown to lessen the impact…. The opposition really was poor through COVID; those with experience were nowhere to be seen/heard, and the inexperienced Starmer was just left saying whatever the government did they should have done more, sooner. Though as it turned out, that approach in Scotland lead to worse health and economic outcomes…

BIossomtoes · 14/11/2023 20:26

Clavinova · 14/11/2023 20:23

verdantverdure
What do you object to about my "Size of NHS Waiting List" graph?

September 2009
The NHS will have to find ways of saving up to £20 billion, Health Secretary Andy Burnham has told think tank, the King's Fund.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/6208651/NHS-told-to-find-ways-of-saving-20-billion.html

So they spent less money and achieved all this. I’m very, very surprised you posted that Clav.

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/High-Performing-NHS-progress-review-1997-2010-Ruth-Thorlby-Jo-Maybin-Kings-Fund-April-2010.pdf

https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/High-Performing-NHS-progress-review-1997-2010-Ruth-Thorlby-Jo-Maybin-Kings-Fund-April-2010.pdf

verdantverdure · 14/11/2023 20:28

TokyoSushi · 13/11/2023 20:30

Genuine non goody question, are there not Sure Start centres any more? My DC were born in 2010 & 2012 and they were brilliant! Health Visitors, Baby weighing, free 'Tiny Stars' parenting courses, free or very cheap stay & play type of things, loads of opportunities to meet new Mums etc

I haven't seen one for a decade or more but there are still a few in existence.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:30

But a link posted above (mid-afternoon today IIRC) from the Guardian was an interview with Alistair Darling in late 2009 saying that government spending would have to be cut by 25%. Then there was an election and it fell to the Coalition to impose the cuts. Twenty five percent is too big a percentage to spare any govt department. It was going to hit benefits, health, education and defence, so pain all round. The economy has not picked up enough since 2009 to restore the funding, despite massive tax increases, plus Brexit, a pandemic and an energy crisis caused by Putin's invasion of Ukraine. But we are not alone in suffering the pain, so is Germany, and France, and the Italians are much closer to breaching debt ceilings as they try to deal with hundreds of thousands of refugees and economic migrants arriving on their beaches.

EasternStandard · 14/11/2023 20:31

Tryingtokeepgoing · 14/11/2023 20:25

Though Darling is on record as saying that the impact of COVID would be much much worse than that of the financial crisis, and called for an early and clear plan for the lifting of lockdown to lessen the impact…. The opposition really was poor through COVID; those with experience were nowhere to be seen/heard, and the inexperienced Starmer was just left saying whatever the government did they should have done more, sooner. Though as it turned out, that approach in Scotland lead to worse health and economic outcomes…

Agree with all this. So much demand for lockdowns on here surprised people are now talking about the cost, although not really as that’s the internet/ mn generally. No realisation at the time even though it was obvious.

Though as it turned out, that approach in Scotland lead to worse health and economic outcomes…

Yep

Winwit · 14/11/2023 20:34

It was better. But I don’t think it was necessarily because the Labour government was better. It was a different time during which the whole world was more prosperous and we didn’t have stuff like the cost of living crisis due to the Ukraine war.

Clavinova · 14/11/2023 20:37

BIossomtoes
So they spent less money

My link is dated September 2009 - Andy Burnham told the NHS they needed to trim their spending by up to £20 billion - i.e. costing the Labour government too much.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:39

Darling was a really good Chancellor in retrospect, he tends to be forgotten but he didn't hold the office for long. I always thought the most sensible thing the 2010 victorious Tories could have done was to keep him on as a caretaker.

jasflowers · 14/11/2023 20:41

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:39

Darling was a really good Chancellor in retrospect, he tends to be forgotten but he didn't hold the office for long. I always thought the most sensible thing the 2010 victorious Tories could have done was to keep him on as a caretaker.

Agree, he certainly realised the UK needed Austerity but he wanted it to end, unfortunately the Tories kept on with it, after 13 years of it, its no wonder we've had such poor growth since the GFC.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:42

He was sensible and fiscally responsible to his backbone.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:44

Out of interest, and purely speculative: when would we putative Chancellors have eased the tightening of the purse strings and where would we have spent the money released?

Clavinova · 14/11/2023 20:45

September 2009

The NHS will have to shed around 137,000 jobs – almost a tenth of its workforce – if it is to meet planned efficiency savings of £20bn, the Department of Health has been warned.
The severity of cutbacks needed by 2014 was contained in advice presented by management consultants McKinsey to the government this spring.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/sep/02/nhs-advised-to-lose-workers

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 20:49

To answer my own question, I think I would have stuck with austerity until 2015, but I would (temperamentally, as a One Nation Tory) probably have started to give small business tax breaks to expense investments and directed the savings into education and science. But obviously, hindsight.

Clavinova · 14/11/2023 20:52

jasflowers · 14/11/2023 20:41

Agree, he certainly realised the UK needed Austerity but he wanted it to end, unfortunately the Tories kept on with it, after 13 years of it, its no wonder we've had such poor growth since the GFC.

Austerity 'officially' ended in 2018 - a bit later than the estimate in my Guardian link up thread (March 2010);

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said hefty tax rises and Whitehall spending cuts of 25% were in prospect during the six-year squeeze lasting until 2017 that would follow the chancellor's (Darling's) "treading water" budget

user1471439240 · 14/11/2023 20:56

There is no more money to pay the bills, all the promises are unfunded, taxation is at record levels with a moribund economy. Governments of all hues will do what they know best, they will take from the fattest cows - the pension schemes and the housing market.
Expect a further hollowing out of the middle class.

WhichIsItWendy · 14/11/2023 21:04

Life felt hopeful and optimistic.

Labour spent money, yes. But they invested in people and services. I hope my kids get to experience a similar environment; the austerity measures are utterly depressing and dangerous.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 21:05

I'm probably a lone voice on most of social media, and certainly here, in thinking that decoupling from the EU might not turn out such an error over a long term. There's a lot of comfort to be had from snuggling up to a big powerful political bloc and we have definitely suffered pain and dislocation from doing so. But much of sunny Southern Europe is really missing people like me, who would have retired there, learnt the language, paid tax (quite a lot of it) while restoring a rundown property in an area losing it's youth to cities and opportunities. So much so that the French Senate is proposing bending the 90 day rule to give UK (specifically) second home owners the opportunity to ask for easier terms on longer stays.

Hecate01 · 14/11/2023 21:07

Winwit · 14/11/2023 20:34

It was better. But I don’t think it was necessarily because the Labour government was better. It was a different time during which the whole world was more prosperous and we didn’t have stuff like the cost of living crisis due to the Ukraine war.

This is the most accurate answer.

I lost 2 friends in the Iraq war, sent to die for weapons that never existed and Blair knew that.

Also watched my Dsis partner die from NHS waiting lists so it wasn't all sunshine and rainbows.

VimtoVimto · 14/11/2023 21:16

Lastchancechica · 14/11/2023 18:16

The rank incompetence of Labour worries me greatly. Starmer is no Tony Blair

Edited

It would obviously be a change from the well managed Conservative government we have enjoyed over the past five years.

Alexandero · 14/11/2023 21:21

We were only on my mum's wage, as my dad was ill and then passed away.
Mum was a teacher and said the only time she ever got a noticeable pay rise was in those Labour years (1997 onwards).
We could afford our first holiday abroad to France. Life seemed more liveable in those days.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 21:22

You are being sarky, and correctly so. But could you stir your brain into thinking about HOW you might improve the situation? Very aware that I am not adding much in the way of new ideas however.

Fieldofbrokenpromises · 14/11/2023 21:22

ElsieMc · 14/11/2023 18:11

I was born in the sixties so remember the real Labour Governments of the 70's. What I remember is strike after strike, going home from school to power cuts, the three day week, rubbish mounting up and bodies unburied. It was not a happy time, the country was in thrall to the Unions. Although anti union measures may have gone too far now, this was what happened that led to this. And I only speak through the eyes of a very young person at the time.

Blair and Brown were a completely different ball game and tbf, I could not even tell the difference from the Tories other than better ideas. The problem with this as another poster has said, is that those ideas were not properly costed nor managed. One in particular was an excellent project keeping young mums in education. But there was no project coordinator locally, it being managed remotely, leaving unsupported young people falling by the wayside. They also bought in private healthcare to disperse the long NHS waiting lists. I know because my dd benefitted from this.

They also brought in Special Guardianship as a measure between residence orders and adoption. Again, good idea but ill conceived legislatively in that the very issue it sought to protect children from, it failed to do ie constant court applications by the bio parents.

Not too sure about Keir Starmer tbh but he will get in at the next GE so everyone will get a chance to experience life under Labour - or a sort of Labour.

Your memory is letting you down. Power cuts and the three day week were under a Tory government.

Papyrophile · 14/11/2023 21:23

Aaah, nostalgia @Alexandero .

paddyclampofthethirdkind · 14/11/2023 21:29

Infinitely better

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.