Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"All fur coat no knickers" - where in UK or further afield?

252 replies

redwinetalking · 20/09/2023 23:37

I have to admit I love this phrase and can think of several towns, areas and localities where "IMHO" it may have applied.

Obviously not travelled everywhere but what are you "FCNK" places?

OP posts:
VerticalSausages · 20/09/2023 23:40

I thought it was more a phrase to describe a person rather than a place?

LivingTheDreamNow · 20/09/2023 23:42

Like the comment above, the saying is to describe a person, not a place.

WillowCraft · 20/09/2023 23:42

It means a person who looks rich but is actually poor. How can it apply to a place?

MothershipG · 20/09/2023 23:43

Brighton

MrsApplepants · 20/09/2023 23:43

No idea what you are on about. That phrase describes a person, not a place.

Johnnylewis · 20/09/2023 23:44

Do you mean places which are perceived as affluent, but have poverty and social problems bubbling beneath the surface?

CrapBucket · 20/09/2023 23:44

Are you Miranda’s mum? I have just mentally read your post in what I call Miranda’s mum’s voice

CrappyBarbara · 20/09/2023 23:46

OP wants to know where to go to feel as superior as possible.

Eve223 · 20/09/2023 23:47

Bath

Time40 · 20/09/2023 23:51

It means a person who looks rich but is actually poor

I've never understood the phrase that way. I think it means someone or something that has a dressy surface, but nothing underneath - so it could actually refer to a place.

comedownwithme · 20/09/2023 23:53

Time40 · 20/09/2023 23:51

It means a person who looks rich but is actually poor

I've never understood the phrase that way. I think it means someone or something that has a dressy surface, but nothing underneath - so it could actually refer to a place.

It can't refer to a place, places don't wear coats, or knickers.

Abetterplaice · 20/09/2023 23:53

I've always taken it to mean all show and no substance so it could equally be applied to people and places.

Time40 · 20/09/2023 23:59

@comedownwithme It can't refer to a place, places don't wear coats, or knickers There is this interesting thing called metaphor ...

honkersbonkers38 · 20/09/2023 23:59

I also understand it to mean all show and no substance rather than being about money. So someone who makes a big show of how classy they are and is a bit flashy - BUT who lacks education, taste, subtlety, grace. It can be humourous - or can be classist and nasty.

OneTC · 20/09/2023 23:59

Time40 · 20/09/2023 23:51

It means a person who looks rich but is actually poor

I've never understood the phrase that way. I think it means someone or something that has a dressy surface, but nothing underneath - so it could actually refer to a place.

This is correct

redwinetalking · 21/09/2023 00:00

As far as I'm aware it can describe a place or person (or anything in between). I think the poster who says places can't wear knickers is maybe being a bit too literal.

Definition is: "Having a superficially positive appearance that is belied by the reality, e.g., superficially elegant and beautiful but actually common."

And no I am not Miranda's mum - was just casting a question out there!

OP posts:
KandieKaine · 21/09/2023 00:03

Net in the window - nowt on the table

redwinetalking · 21/09/2023 00:03

To add I do think it's a northern phrase that may lose meaning to anyone who is not from "oop" here

OP posts:
redwinetalking · 21/09/2023 00:04

@KandieKaine Exactly!!

OP posts:
sobercuriouskind · 21/09/2023 00:04

I know what you mean OP.

Cheltenham.

smooththecat · 21/09/2023 00:05

Some places do actually wear fur coats and knickers, and some women wear buildings and street furniture

Gillstuck · 21/09/2023 00:08

I take it to mean all style and no substance. So it could be a place as well as a person.

Like Paris.

tiggergoesbounce · 21/09/2023 00:09

I've never understood the phrase that way. I think it means someone or something that has a dressy surface, but nothing underneath - so it could actually refer to a place

Same here. Something looks classy on the outside but its really not.

MrsTerryPratchett · 21/09/2023 00:11

LA

That is all.

fairfatandfrumpy · 21/09/2023 00:12

KandieKaine · 21/09/2023 00:03

Net in the window - nowt on the table

What does this mean?