This is a real bugbear for me at the moment: recently there's a tendency (particularly on MN but also in real life) to describe any strongly-held view, boundary enforcement or disagreement with anyone as "drama".
For example: (artificial but plausible)
Boss asks someone to do something they find morally or ethically objectionable Poster comes onto MN and says they have been asked to do something at work which is against their moral principles in some way. Poster comes onto MN and says: "I don't want to do this, should I tell boss why?"
MN en masse: "Just say no. No need for the drama".
There are dozens of responses a day like this. Any question that's asked about almost anything, will generate tens of "no need for the drama" responses. What is the point of these responses?
I think this is a mischaracterisation of what "drama" means. For me "drama" means needlessly amping up the emotion on a situation, stringing it along and dragging bystanders into it for attention. It doesn't mean that you have no right to voice an opinion about something you have strong views on. Or that you shouldn't stand up for yourself or disagree with people and tell them why you are standing up for yourself.
There's something a bit slippery slope (to me) about the idea that saying what you think and expressing views on things is bad form, boring or inappropriate. Of course no one likes a real drama queen or a whinger, but the idea that everyone just has to keep all their views to themselves and never say what they think is unhealthy in my view. How are you supposed to manage interpersonal relationships if you just shut people down without further discussion about why you are saying no to something?
Also this is a talk thread. By definition its a place where people will express opinions about things. Telling them to stop the "drama" completely undermines the point of a discussion forum.