Interesting. Considering men commit 90% of all violent crime (and 98% of all sexual crime), there 'could' be up to 10 women on that list. There's only 4. Being pedantic, you could say the very worst crimes are even more overwhelmingly committed by men.
Anyone who uses an anomaly statistic as 'proof' that the majority statistic (that men are overwhelming violent crime perpetrators) doesn't matter or isn't 'as bad' is thick as mince.
Whataboutery is an argument tactic used by those who have no argument. It's designed purely to distract your energy towards defending something irrelevant, rather than continue to support your original point.
You might also ask yourself why he feels so personally attacked by a simple statistic. A statistic so skewed towards one sex, he feels the need to defend it because he happens to be that sex.
Less seriously, 'women' are given blanket stereotypes that misogynists some people apply to 'all women'. Golddiggers, using men as sperm donors and child support by 'trapping them', getting called a 'Karen' for standing up for herself and being assertive... these are just off the top of my head... women in the workplace are called 'ballbreakers' and 'aggressive' where men doing the same thing are simply called 'assertive', or it's not mentioned at all as it's expected from men.
I don't take any of these personally, as a woman. Because they don't apply to me. I'm sure there are women about who trap men or manipulate a pregnancy, or get with/stay with a man for his money. But it doesn't hurt me so personally that I feel the need to start going on about 'men do it too!' (cocklodgers?).
I would only do that if the statements had touched a nerve. The other two examples, I am actually 'guilty' of standing up for myself in a calm and measured way in my personal life and the workplace. If people don't like a woman doing that, they need to go back to the 19th century. It's a them problem.
So why is he, instead of acknowledging the problem of male violence, putting distractions into the argument so that he can bury his head in the sand? If he got on board with not condoning the overwhelming violence of men, and society somehow eradicated it, the majority of violent crime would be eradicated too...
Just point out the statistics in my first paragraph, and then take the recent murders in the news, and the stats of male/female perpertrators will still be roughly in line with those stats. They always are. It's not a close 'race' in the slightest.