Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Drivers not following Highway code

160 replies

MikeRafone · 19/08/2023 09:13

https://x.com/citizenuddin/status/1687092237786820608?s=46&t=6ReKAbxD2gRFwL---KRV8w

why do drivers not follow the Highway Code?

if you’re not going to update yourself regularly on Highway ide you should lose your licence to drive

https://x.com/citizenuddin/status/1687092237786820608?s=46&t=6ReKAbxD2gRFwL---KRV8w

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
OneTC · 28/08/2023 14:15

IDriveMySupernova · 28/08/2023 13:42

What happens if you stop for a pedestrian but there’s a car coming the other way who doesn’t? I stopped for a pedestrian in this situation recently, as per new rule, and a car suddenly came round the corner and entered the junction from the other side of the road but didn’t bother. I like to be as considerate as possible to pedestrians but I worry they’ll think it’s completely safe to go because I’ve stopped and then get flattened.

I’m sure when I was learning to drive many years ago I was told never to wave someone across because you can’t be certain it’s safe, in a similar way to how you’re not supposed to flash your lights at people as a ‘you can go’ signal. I’m very surprised someone did that during their test and didn’t fail.

You do the right thing and just let everyone else get on with being stupid or inconsiderate. You don't roll through a pedestrian crossing because pedestrians might not look or another driver might not stop

Daftasabroom · 28/08/2023 14:18

Kat19899 · 20/08/2023 00:00

Recently did my theory test. Thought you only had to give way to pedestrians already in the road?

It changed in the spring this year if I recall and was very well advertised.

Daftasabroom · 28/08/2023 14:24

Justgonefishing · 19/08/2023 09:51

It’s a safety hazard this change and I as a pedestrian am never going to presume a car is going to stop for me……there are so many reasons why it doesn’t work if you live in a busy area or where cars are travelling more than 20….I always think I’m going to risk being rear ended when driving as the car behind me isn’t necessarily going to see any pedestrians waiting to cross. Also means runners have even more excuse to run out in the road in front of you mid turn!

I don't know about you, but if I see a vehicle in front of me indicating to turn into a junction I slow down, when their brake lights come on I slow more. If there is someone crossing, or waiting to cross the junction I know the vehicle in front will have to stop, I slow or stop accordingly. Its not hard.

enchantedsquirrelwood · 28/08/2023 14:58

You are not going to be rear ended because you slow down for a pedestrian. It's utter nonsense.

And anyway, the damage to your car if someone does go into the back of you is far less than you will do to the pedestrian!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Have I done enough !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

but really, the mind boggles.

The Highway Code applies across the UK, with possibly a couple of differences in NI - this is not one of them - you do not run down pedestrians who are crossing a side road you want to turn into or out of.

IDriveMySupernova · 28/08/2023 15:11

OneTC · 28/08/2023 14:15

You do the right thing and just let everyone else get on with being stupid or inconsiderate. You don't roll through a pedestrian crossing because pedestrians might not look or another driver might not stop

No, but a proper pedestrian crossing is obvious. Evidently this new rule isn’t obvious, the thread is about how drivers aren’t bothering to follow it. When a car stops to allow a pedestrian to cross outside of a crossing, rightly or wrongly many s pedestrian will assume it’s safe to go.

DuesToTheDirt · 28/08/2023 15:21

OneTC · 28/08/2023 13:56

That's exactly what it was, it's a codification of the type of polite driving that was pretty much the accepted norm

Not at all - it's a definite change. Previously, the pedestrian had right of way if they were already crossing. Now, they have right of way if they are standing on the corner waiting to cross.

Previously drivers didn't give way to the pedestrians in the second scenario, and in my experience, despite the change in rules they still don't.

OneTC · 28/08/2023 16:52

Now, they have right of way if they are standing on the corner waiting to cross.

Can you show me that bit exactly please.

OneTC · 28/08/2023 16:56

You should...

...give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which you are turning.

The very important part of that being should not must.

Tomikka · 28/08/2023 17:13

enchantedsquirrelwood · 19/08/2023 21:48

Although it would be useful if they were marked in some way but that would cost far too much, so drivers just need to use their brain cells.

The road is marked.

Note the two give way lines at junctions, a single and a double dotted line

Drivers not following Highway code
BlackberrySky · 28/08/2023 17:57

Bonfire23 · 20/08/2023 14:19

I get the rule but sometimes...
I drive a road through the town centre in a Saturday and then have to turn left onto a side road to get out of town
You can imagine on a Saturday it's just a constant flow of shoppers and I've sat there for (I timed it) 17 mins before with massive amounts of traffic/buses behind me. Can't turn as no traffic lights and no break in pedestrians

It did have traffic lights but they removed them to make it more pedestrian friendly... Confused

I am afraid I think you're exaggerating. You sat for SEVENTEEN MINUTES waiting to turn into a side road on a busy Saturday? I don't know where you live but round here that would cause chaos and people would just drive round you and make the turn. You're saying there was not one single gap in pedestrian flow for seventeen minutes? I don't believe you.

DuesToTheDirt · 28/08/2023 18:01

OneTC · 28/08/2023 16:56

You should...

...give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which you are turning.

The very important part of that being should not must.

Given that no distinction is made in that sentence between pedestrians who are waiting and ones who are already in the road, I wouldn't like to say that the 'should' here is supposed to be optoinal.

OneTC · 28/08/2023 18:05

The next sentence leads with must. That you must stop if they are in the road already. Which means there's no requirement to stop if they are just waiting.

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 18:09

I wouldn’t stop turning in to a side road for someone to cross, I’d run the risk of being rear ended. The onus should be on the pedestrian to not step in to the road without looking.

That said, I do think middle lane hogging should incur points. It’s some of the worst sort of driving imo.

OneTC · 28/08/2023 18:10

Actually I've misquoted on the second part it doesn't say must it says:

"If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way"

So the whole section is

You should: give way to pedestrians crossing or waiting to cross a road into which or from which you are turning. If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way

Was with all other shoulds and musts in the highway code one is advisory and the other is a rule that you must observe

OneTC · 28/08/2023 18:31

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 18:09

I wouldn’t stop turning in to a side road for someone to cross, I’d run the risk of being rear ended. The onus should be on the pedestrian to not step in to the road without looking.

That said, I do think middle lane hogging should incur points. It’s some of the worst sort of driving imo.

I've been stopping at junctions on side roads for 30+ years and never been rear ended, because I'm using my indicators and approaching at a reasonable speed for taking potentially blind corners at

Daftasabroom · 28/08/2023 18:31

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 18:09

I wouldn’t stop turning in to a side road for someone to cross, I’d run the risk of being rear ended. The onus should be on the pedestrian to not step in to the road without looking.

That said, I do think middle lane hogging should incur points. It’s some of the worst sort of driving imo.

Let me get this straight:

You will put the lives of other people at risk just in case some other negligent driver dings your precious motor vehicle?

Scunnered123 · 28/08/2023 19:02

Some of the driving I witness on a daily basis makes me wonder if we should rethink how should drive.

www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/aug/17/traffic-videos-chaos-removing-signals-shared-space

Ohforfox · 28/08/2023 19:08

I don't think many pedestrians are aware of it either- everytime I stop to let them cross they either look at me like I'm a wierdo or thank me profusely. To be fair I also tell my kids to wait until it's clear and not to assume the car will stop. It's difficult!

ShadyCat · 28/08/2023 19:58

@BlackberrySky nope, not joking. It's the main road through town which is one lane and one way. They've done everything possible to make it so nobody can drive in town now

No traffic lights. Before the traffic lights would let pedestrians across, and stop traffic and it was perfectly safe
It was an abnormally busy day around Christmas but I had to go to the opticians. I had edged forward a bit but the car in front of me was stuck too, all the buses get stuck in it..
they've labelled it a shared space which basically means pedestrians walk without looking and car drivers can't move

ShadyCat · 28/08/2023 20:01

Cropped but this is what they've done, it's the only road through the main part of the city
You can see the shared space/what was the pavement
So you've got people crossing across the main bit in front of you, as well as each of the side streets and you can't move as well, you can't run them over!

Drivers not following Highway code
sleepyscientist · 28/08/2023 20:06

@enchantedsquirrelwood stop and hey rear ended or turn avoid the pedestrian and don't get rear ended

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 20:10

Daftasabroom · 28/08/2023 18:31

Let me get this straight:

You will put the lives of other people at risk just in case some other negligent driver dings your precious motor vehicle?

To be fair I don’t live in a city and a lot of my driving is on 40/50/60 mph roads but yes. I wouldn’t give way to a pedestrian waiting to cross the road if I was driving off one of those - it wouldn’t be safe.

Pedestrians should look before they cross.

MikeRafone · 28/08/2023 20:29

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 20:10

To be fair I don’t live in a city and a lot of my driving is on 40/50/60 mph roads but yes. I wouldn’t give way to a pedestrian waiting to cross the road if I was driving off one of those - it wouldn’t be safe.

Pedestrians should look before they cross.

The hierarchy has changed, the onus is now on drivers to give priority to pedestrians. It’s to make roads safer. If you have some drivers that refuse to change, imo that makes them dangerous

OP posts:
Insommmmnia · 28/08/2023 20:33

BoobyDazzler · 28/08/2023 20:10

To be fair I don’t live in a city and a lot of my driving is on 40/50/60 mph roads but yes. I wouldn’t give way to a pedestrian waiting to cross the road if I was driving off one of those - it wouldn’t be safe.

Pedestrians should look before they cross.

If you can wait to turn in to a road off a 40/50/60 road if you are turning right why is suddenly dangerous to do it turning left?

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 28/08/2023 20:36

fiftiesmum · 19/08/2023 20:25

Would be useful if people had to redo the theory test (perhaps could be part of the insurance renewal) - the hazard perception test is difficult for experienced drivers - was told this by police as they notice much more and can categorize it but the test is just hazard or not

Not every year surely? Insurance is going up enough as it is without adding yet more costs!

Swipe left for the next trending thread