I've just come back from a holiday on which one of the dc damaged one of their gadgets in a careless accident - think knocking it off a table, so not something utterly ridiculous like throwing it. I've just checked our insurance in the hope it might be covered as I know I paid a bit extra for gadget cover. By the time you go through all the exclusions this really amounts to burglary cover as the only type of loss covered is if someone forcefully entered the locked property and took it! That's not really loss, is it?
Although it's called loss or accident, the definition of accident is nowhere near the standard. I mean I expected things like following the manufacture's instructions and not using it in water, for example. But it mentions they won't cover any damage caused by negligence, which I assume covers pretty much anything that would normally be considered an accident. As I said, loss just seems to mean if it's stolen from a locked property.
What a waste of money! It was a mid-price product, not the cheapest at all. Obviously I know you should read all this stuff beforehand. In future I'll just see travel insurance as to be used if someone is seriously ill, injured, or worse.
Basically it seems you need to pay s fortune to have insurance that actually covers stuff and the people who can afford this could probably easily afford the replace their items anyway. Or have I misunderstood?